igneum/docs/plans/funding.md
igneum-labs 0511d038be Evidence page, end-to-end proving standard, funding plan, security-budget stress, payment routes
docs/evidence.md and site/evidence.html: 28 public claims with one of five status labels (7 designed, 3 implemented, 18 tested by the team, 0 reproduced externally, 0 reviewed independently), version or commit, the reproducible test, the result with date and machine, and independent verification (none yet for every row). Evidence link in the homepage nav and the generated pages' nav.
docs/benchmarks/proving-e2e.md: replaces the 20-second shard gate with three fixed workloads, job-received-to-accepted-proof latency, cost per proof, the eligible card list with mining and proving reported separately, the verbatim acceptance standard and the three-unrelated-operator protocol.
docs/plans/funding.md: cost, what is funded (founder's means, the client's 1% fee once there is mining), what waits on revenue, what pauses.
docs/analysis/security-budget.md: emission through six halvings at three price inputs, miners and provers separate from burns, the USD 1M floor and the year it is crossed.
docs/design/payment-routes.md: Mermaid flowchart and table of every flow, with operator, app, team and protocol revenue labelled.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-03 22:35:03 +00:00

9.4 KiB

Funding plan

3 October 2026. What the project costs to build, review, run and defend, what pays for it today, what waits on revenue, and what pauses if revenue is late. Every dollar figure is approximate unless it cites a price list, and the basis is stated in the row. Nothing here is a sale of anything and no figure is a price of the coin.

1. What funds the project

Source What it is Status
The founder's own means Private money and the founder's own time. The amount committed is not published and this plan does not pretend to know the ceiling The only source today
The official client's 1% fee The official miner client charges 1% of a miner's rewards to the operating company (litepaper, "What a miner's hour looks like"). It is a client setting, not a protocol rule; any miner can run another client and pay nothing Zero until there is mining with value, which is mainnet (November 2027 on the roadmap); then unknown, because it is hashrate times coin price times 1% times the share of miners on the official client
The team's own mining, proving and apps The team mines from genesis like anyone, runs provers in the job market and collects the 20% app share on contracts it deploys (spec 5.5) Zero until mainnet; competitive, not guaranteed
Protocol treasury, protocol fee, emission share None exists and none will (spec 5.5, 5.6) Zero, by rule
Token sale, pre-sale, allocation, grant from a foundation None Zero, by rule

So until mainnet every cost below is the founder's. After mainnet the 1% fee and the team's open-market earnings join, and both depend on a chain that has not launched and a coin that has no value today.

2. The table

Columns: estimated cost with its basis; what is funded today; what depends on future revenue; what happens if revenue arrives late. "Revenue" means the 1% fee and the team's open-market earnings after mainnet, and nothing else.

Item Estimated cost (approximate) and basis Funded today Depends on future revenue If revenue is late
Development: founder and agents through mainnet (13 months) No dollar figure: the founder's time and the agent tooling the founder already pays for. Basis: CLAUDE.md team section; docs/fud-fixes.md row 29 (method disclosed) Founder's own means No Continues
Development: a contracted cryptographer for phases 1 and 2 (lottery hash soundness, VDF code against chiavdf, seed derivation; docs/fud-fixes.md row 71, O-1.4, O-4.1) USD 80,000 to 150,000 for about six months part time. Basis: from memory of contract rates for applied cryptography, approximate Founder's own means No Scope shrinks to the gate 1 review of the fair-lottery properties only; the VDF review moves to the audit row
Development: the second independent node client Not in the 13-month plan (docs/fud-fixes.md rows 31, 47). Basis: decision pending Not funded Yes, entirely Does not start
Independent review: finality rule v2 (gate 3, phase 4, the rule external review is paid to break) USD 50,000 to 100,000. Basis: a focused review of one consensus rule plus its simulation by two reviewers over a few weeks, from memory, approximate Founder's own means No Not pausable: the roadmap says the phase 4 gate is "finality design passes external review". If it cannot be paid, phase 4 does not close and the dates move
Independent audit: the node fork (consensus delta, p2p, difficulty, header validation, the pow engine) before public testnet USD 60,000 to 120,000. Basis: the delta is listed row by row in docs/fork-divergence.md; the base is rusty-kaspa, already audited upstream, approximate Founder's own means, second in order after the finality review Partly: a second pass after the attack harness closes its stubs The single pass is kept; the second pass waits. Public testnet does not open without the first pass
Independent audit: execution layer and proving integration (revm driver, two-dimensional gas, proof records, the veto, the ProofSystem version 1 integration) before mainnet USD 80,000 to 150,000. Basis: an EVM-integration audit of a new client's execution path, from memory, approximate Not funded Yes Mainnet moves until it is paid. Mainnet does not ship with an unaudited execution layer
Independent audit: the official client and release process (spec 08: reproducible builds, release key, update path) USD 20,000 to 40,000. Basis: a short application security review, from memory, approximate Not funded Yes The one-click app ships at testnet unaudited and says so on the download page; the audit lands before mainnet or the app does not carry the mainnet release key
Infrastructure: the 20-node cloud devnet USD 476 per month for 20 nodes (Hetzner API prices of 3 October 2026, net, docs/plans/cloud-devnet.md); about USD 6,000 for the 13 months, plus rented GPU hours for the hourly-compile and shard measurements at USD 0.22 to 0.74 per card hour (RunPod, 3 October 2026): under USD 1,000 over phase 2 Founder's own means No Node count drops to 8 (two per location); the rented GPU hours are replaced by the project's own cards
Infrastructure: seed nodes, site, observer database, domains Seed nodes USD 50 to 80 per month for three to five (docs/plans/seed-nodes.md); the site and the observer's database are on free or near-free tiers today, approximate; 15 domains at the registrar's renewal price, approximate USD 500 per year Founder's own means No Three seeds not five; nothing else changes
Incident response: an on-call second engineer from public testnet, an emergency-release drill, the soundness-bug path of spec 5.7 and design 5.5 rehearsed USD 3,000 to 6,000 per month retainer from August 2027; about USD 40,000 through the first mainnet quarter. Basis: a part-time retainer at contract rates, from memory, approximate Not funded Yes The founder is the on-call engineer alone; the drill still runs, because it costs time and not money; the retainer starts when the fee pays it
Challenge reward: the chip bounty (O-1.17), paid to anyone who shows a chip design that beats a GPU by more than 2x USD 50,000 standing. Basis: sized to pay for a credible design study with a measured operation count, not a tapeout; the amount is a decision, not a market rate Not funded; the terms and the payer are the entity's (docs/fud-fixes.md row 50) Yes: the bounty is announced with the January 2027 benchmark and escrowed when the entity has the money Announced at a lower standing amount (USD 10,000) and raised when revenue allows; a bounty that cannot be paid is not announced
Challenge reward: the finality break bounty (litepaper "Questions miners ask") USD 25,000 standing. Basis: as above Not funded Yes As above
Challenge reward: the reproduction reward of docs/benchmarks/proving-e2e.md 8.1 (a fixed, equal, disclosed amount per unrelated operator) USD 1,000 per operator per workload set, three operators, about USD 3,000 per campaign. Basis: covers electricity and a day of attention, approximate Not funded Yes Reproduction is asked for without a reward; the standard allows that
Legal: counsel on the entity, the promotions question, the testnet payment terms, the no-custody structure of the job market (docs/fud-fixes.md rows 46, 58, 59) USD 20,000 to 50,000. Basis: from memory, approximate Founder's own means No Continues; it gates public text, not code

3. Totals

Bucket Approximate total Funded today
Development (cryptographer; founder time unpriced) USD 80,000 to 150,000 Yes
Independent review and audits USD 210,000 to 410,000 The finality review and the first node pass: USD 110,000 to 220,000. The execution and client audits, USD 100,000 to 190,000: no
Infrastructure USD 8,000 to 10,000 through mainnet Yes
Incident response USD 40,000 through the first mainnet quarter No
Challenge rewards USD 78,000 standing plus USD 3,000 per campaign No
Legal USD 20,000 to 50,000 Yes
Total USD 440,000 to 740,000 through the first mainnet quarter, plus standing bounties About USD 220,000 to 430,000 funded; about USD 220,000 to 310,000 unfunded, all of it after public testnet

The unfunded half is the half that comes after the chain exists and before and just after it launches: the execution audit, the client audit, incident response and the bounties. Each row says what pauses. Two things never pause and instead move the date: the finality review (phase 4 gate) and the execution audit (mainnet). The plan is to delay rather than to launch unreviewed.

4. What the 1% fee could be, and why it is not counted

The fee is 1% of rewards on the official client. Rewards in year one are 963 million IGN (ramp included, docs/analysis/security-budget.md). At the low, base and high price inputs of that analysis the fee's ceiling, with every miner on the official client, is USD 48,000, 193,000 and 963,000 a year. Those are inputs, not expectations, and the share of miners on the official client is unknown. Nothing in section 2 is funded against them.

5. Rules

  1. No item is paid from emission or from a protocol fee, because neither exists.
  2. A review or audit that is paid for is published whole, pass or fail, and linked from docs/evidence.md.
  3. A bounty is announced only when it is escrowed.
  4. This plan is revised when a number changes; the git history of this file is the record.