The merge: accept.rs takes master's shadow pass in run_unit (the per-load sub-blocks keep their place inside the loop; the end-of-iteration pass is empty for that class) and its Acc fields beside site_bit_ones; generator.rs records the per-load and tile id bytes through master's recorder (r.lit "perload", r.lit "mm8/" and the tiles field), nothing for the class v4 shape; export-exclude keeps both sides.
The fix (the invention lane's finding, 8 October 2026, 10:48 UTC): BiasedIndexBit judged every index bit, and under an era a narrow-window site's top k bits are fixed by design, so every per-load form read 0 of 256 under any drawn era for the instrument's reason; it now judges only the bits inside each site's window mask (verify::window) and the (c'') pass, which runs the unit with no table, accumulates nothing. The research file's 20.2a-close reads REOPENED (the 16 x 27 form dead on the no-era census on both instruments; the sound form mx8+shl4096x1 accepts 234 of 256 seeds no-era; its drawn-era verdict the invention lane's 15:00 BST read); chip-model-v3 5.11 the same.
chip-model-v3 5.12 (main's order, 11:3x UK): the 2 GiB SRAM full store on one N2 reticle (17x at zero shadow, 2.7x to 4.8x with it, USD 400 to 600 of silicon, an N2 project of USD 100 M to 500 M) and the custom HBM4E base die (6.5x to 14x, untouched by the four layers), per-bank PIM's structural blindness, the M5 Max at 0.78 microjoules as the honest denominator; lane B's figures, labelled.
docs/design/class-v6-rotating-family.md: section 0's lead on the SRAM store, 0.1 the per-tier schedule table, layers 2 to 4 with lane A's priced schedule (5.5 / 8 / 11 GiB), lane D's three rings and the op-mix band (B = 4 on the injecting families, the lossy sum capped; 8 of 663 eras exhausting at the uncapped corner), the index fold as a layer-1 rule, the measured M5 Max size rows (-12 / -20 / -22 percent of rate at 2 / 4 / 8 GiB), the 5070 Ti stock pair, the x16 mixer rows with build-3's sibling-loaded method (11.4 ms, admissible false on the measurement), 7a lane B, 7b lane A, 7c lane C's layers 5 to 7, section 9 the served-line review for main's 20:00 word.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/analysis/class-v6/history.md: 21 chip rows by mechanism (what each chip specialised, what the design missed, the timeline, the v6 layer, closed or not, the per-joule number); in-depth sections for Ethash (the E3's DDR3, Linzhi's 4.4 GB beside 64 compute units, the Jasminer X4's DRAM hybrid-bonded onto a 40/45 nm die, the E9), ProgPoW (the Least Authority and Rao audits read from the PDFs, Kik, Linzhi's claim, the adopters), RandomX (the X5's RISC-V board at 1.46x, the X9 announced December 2025 and withdrawn May 2026 with zero units, RandomX v2 released 25 March 2026 with activation pending, the Qubic episode as the detector's lesson), Cuckoo (the GRN1's 512 MiB SRAM die, the G32, the iPollo G1, the 2025 bounty), Equihash (the Z9's single die, the Fudan parameter-following design), Scrypt and Argon2 (the BM1485's on-die scratchpads, Percival's lookup gap, MTP), the no-chip hashes, kHeavyHash, CryptoNight, X16R, Lyra2REv2, the compute rows. The four layers against the history layer by layer, with the E3's death dates, Autolykos's growth rule, the design-cycle and FPGA-compile clocks, and the honest verdict that the stored-dataset chip (class C) is not closed by any layer: 5.1x per joule at zero premium, 2.1x with the shadow at k = 1. Two corrections to the 5 October file (the X9, RandomX v2) and one claim marked unverified (the 5x fork-surviving chip). First cut for 15:00 UK; the full report by 09:00 UK on 9 October.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/analysis/class-v6/hardware-future.md: one table over PIM and PNM (HBM-PIM, AiM, LPDDR5X-PIM, UPMEM), HBM3E, HBM4 and the custom HBM4E base die, fine-grained DRAM on logic, LPDDR6, 3D DRAM, RLDRAM 3 and Folded Banks, FPGA with HBM2e, wafer-scale, CXL, optical I/O, chiplets and UCIe, and SRAM at N2: energy per dependent read, latency, cost per GB, availability to a non-hyperscaler, the k_read and shadow k bands, the edge per joule at zero shadow against the 5090 and the M5 Max, and the one layer of the four that blunts each with a number. The three findings: a 2 GiB SRAM full store on one N2 reticle is the strongest five-year chip (13x to 17x per joule, about USD 0.3 per MH/s) and no layer reaches it (layer 2 moves its capex, not its joules; the shadow at k = 0.5 holds 4.8x); per-bank PIM is blind (1.6 percent of reads in-bank at 2 GiB) and the custom HBM4E base die is the f = 1 chip with its controller in the stack (6.5x to 14x), untouched by layers 1 to 4; the denominator is the wrong card (the M5 Max at 0.78 microjoules halves to thirds every chip edge). Section 5 carries the k bands for the research lane's chip rows; section 7 the four decisions with defaults and deadlines; section 9 the sources with URLs and dates. tools/ci/export-exclude.txt: docs/analysis/class-v6 is research, not public export.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sections 15 to 19: every GPU block gaming and AI paid for, priced against the best public 4 to 5 nm chip figure with its k band, verifier cost and the edge at the measured premium (the one-sentence answer: nothing reads k above 1 with certainty; the int8 tensor tile is the only block near or above 1, so the tensor shadow with a SIMD byte-dot verifier is the new rank 3); the capex column added to the chip model (both sides capex-dominated at 7x to 10x their electricity; the per-unit capex wall unreachable by 3x to 7x; the project wall doubled from USD 100 M to about USD 200 M of break-even cap by the shadow-per-load design, the mission lane's method); the microbench of 20 probes documented as built (section 18); the owed list.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/analysis/counter-asic-4-research.md (excluded from the public export): edge = (E_card + F) / (E_mem + k F); at zero premium the stored-dataset chip keeps E_card / E_mem, 3.6x on a 5090 locked at 1,400 MHz (measured card, modelled chip), about 2x at that card's idle-plus-memory bound, 1.7x on the M5 Max; class v5 at zero shadow leaves it at 5.1x to 9.1x; the shadow buys 2.1x at k = 1 for the measured 88 W (81.8 W at the knee) and turns against us below 1.8 pJ per op; per-card classes, the refresh as a cost, proof of useful work, memory shaping and the tensor block priced out with their arithmetic; ten designs ranked with the chip edge, the 5090 and 4070 premiums, the verifier cost, agent hours and what breaks each; the recommendation in five sentences; consequences per tier.
proto-cuda/nvrtc/worker.cpp: opt-in SM-sparse variants sp<N> and sp<N>-w<W> (a persistent grid of N blocks of W warps over the dispatch's nonces; the bound kernel rewritten at compile time with exact anchors into a unit function plus a wrapper of the kernel's name; made on demand by name, never in the default race; refused on variant-5 packs and with minBlocks). Gate: mingw cross-compile on igneum-build-1 under lease pool (class measure, label "ca4 research"), exit 0 with -Wall -Wextra, 22:48 UTC; exe sha256 ee8d0e70dd101f125f42c0c7cf07481a794ee18a1317acf68561b37ea18d72be; unrun on a card (the hash lane's PC 1 job run-ca4-pc1-ca4sparse-5090-20261007 is its first run).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The sweep (main's item 1): 199 tracked text files, 783 lines. The founder's full name, first name and possessive become "the founder" (sentence starts capitalised); the lowercase operating-system user name in WSL paths and commands becomes <user>; the second owner login becomes "the second owner login"; the three earlier businesses and the two other brands become "the other business", "the earlier entity", "the earlier business" and "another brand"; the Chrome profile rule names the igneum.network profile, not the profile's label. The standing commit login igneum-labs is not a founder term here: the fresh-repository step renames it in the history (docs/plans/history-rewrite.md, tools/repo/fresh-repo.sh).
The patterns never appear in plain text in the tree (a plaintext list would be the hit): tools/ci/founder-strings.b64 (perl regex, tab, a sample per row) is read by tools/ci/founder-strings-check.sh (every tracked text file, perl, known-failed first: the self-test plants each row's sample in a fixture and the hit must name the file), by tools/community/discord-hooks.mjs (the guard's founder and business rows; the test takes its fixtures from the samples) and by tools/repo/fresh-repo.sh (the business names of the rewrite rules). site/forbidden-strings.txt carries the same patterns as b64: lines, decoded case-insensitive by site/scrub.mjs and tools/ci/launch-gates-check.mjs (whose fixture now plants an encoded made-up name). The check runs in the gate's tree checks on every merge.
Not in this commit, by main's word: the 105 commit messages and 40 personal-identity commits that need the history rewrite (listed, not run), and the secrets found by gitleaks over the history (reported with owners).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
