Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
igneum-labs
b0100a6b69 Merge branch 'ca3-detector' into ca3-coord
# Conflicts:
#	docs/plans/funding.md
2026-10-06 07:48:42 +00:00
igneum-labs
9db5ba1914 Counter ASIC 3.0 items 4 and 5: the issuance trigger, the signal trigger, the FPGA lane and the layer 9 against layer 7 ranking
docs/plans/funding.md rule 5: the bounty is escrowed and the benchmark live before daily
issuance crosses USD 20,000 a day, with the price-per-IGN table per halving period.
docs/plans/epoch-length.md section 11: the detector alert held 6 net windows recommends
the next shorter ladder step, per-tier costs at 2,400 and 600, the adversary's share per
compile class. Section 12: HBM FPGA parts with sources, reads in flight per watt against
the RTX 5090 (0.3x to 0.4x at Shuhai's measured rate, up to 1.9x at the unmeasured bank
ceiling), the two FPGA lanes in one table, and the ranking: layer 9 above layer 7.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 07:47:21 +00:00
igneum-labs
bb9dff0f07 Counter ASIC 3.0 item 3: the mixer cryptanalysis line item and brief in funding.md
One row in the funding table (USD 80,000 to 160,000 for two independent reviews, basis the four RandomX reviews of 2019 at their published per-firm prices and person-days) and a section "The mixer cryptanalysis brief (Counter ASIC 3.0 item 3)": the target shape from memhard.rs and accept.rs, the ranked break list with the chip-model number each moves, deliverables and timebox, the soundness suite to re-run, acceptance criteria in the RandomX audit style, candidate reviewers with citations, the risk column against the two-publish rollout, the timing against the testnet go checklist, and the consequences per user tier. Nothing else in the file is touched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 07:29:45 +00:00
igneum-labs
03b795041d Funding plan marked as a placeholder
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-04 07:23:52 +00:00
igneum-labs
ab6e049762 Evidence page, end-to-end proving standard, funding plan, security-budget stress, payment routes
docs/evidence.md and site/evidence.html: 28 public claims with one of five status labels (7 designed, 3 implemented, 18 tested by the team, 0 reproduced externally, 0 reviewed independently), version or commit, the reproducible test, the result with date and machine, and independent verification (none yet for every row). Evidence link in the homepage nav and the generated pages' nav.
docs/benchmarks/proving-e2e.md: replaces the 20-second shard gate with three fixed workloads, job-received-to-accepted-proof latency, cost per proof, the eligible card list with mining and proving reported separately, the verbatim acceptance standard and the three-unrelated-operator protocol.
docs/plans/funding.md: cost, what is funded (founder's means, the client's 1% fee once there is mining), what waits on revenue, what pauses.
docs/analysis/security-budget.md: emission through six halvings at three price inputs, miners and provers separate from burns, the USD 1M floor and the year it is crossed.
docs/design/payment-routes.md: Mermaid flowchart and table of every flow, with operator, app, team and protocol revenue labelled.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-03 22:35:03 +00:00