Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
igneum-labs
7eed16a29a Pre-public scrub, the text pass (7 October 2026, 19:5x UK): no founder name, personal login, earlier business or personal address in any tracked text file, and a gate check that keeps it so
The sweep (main's item 1): 199 tracked text files, 783 lines. The founder's full name, first name and possessive become "the founder" (sentence starts capitalised); the lowercase operating-system user name in WSL paths and commands becomes <user>; the second owner login becomes "the second owner login"; the three earlier businesses and the two other brands become "the other business", "the earlier entity", "the earlier business" and "another brand"; the Chrome profile rule names the igneum.network profile, not the profile's label. The standing commit login igneum-labs is not a founder term here: the fresh-repository step renames it in the history (docs/plans/history-rewrite.md, tools/repo/fresh-repo.sh).

The patterns never appear in plain text in the tree (a plaintext list would be the hit): tools/ci/founder-strings.b64 (perl regex, tab, a sample per row) is read by tools/ci/founder-strings-check.sh (every tracked text file, perl, known-failed first: the self-test plants each row's sample in a fixture and the hit must name the file), by tools/community/discord-hooks.mjs (the guard's founder and business rows; the test takes its fixtures from the samples) and by tools/repo/fresh-repo.sh (the business names of the rewrite rules). site/forbidden-strings.txt carries the same patterns as b64: lines, decoded case-insensitive by site/scrub.mjs and tools/ci/launch-gates-check.mjs (whose fixture now plants an encoded made-up name). The check runs in the gate's tree checks on every merge.

Not in this commit, by main's word: the 105 commit messages and 40 personal-identity commits that need the history rewrite (listed, not run), and the secrets found by gitleaks over the history (reported with owners).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 18:39:50 +00:00
igneum-labs
b584e41e31 CI on the merged 0.3.11 tree: MacBook reworded in the analysis prose (the identity check's hostname pattern), a presence check before the kit's first use in the three proving-v1 PC 2 scripts (C32), pc1-cpu-prove.ps1 on the socket check's allow list (the CPU path starts no GPU server)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 22:44:09 +00:00
igneum-labs
40a94996f1 Analysis: proving methods, the memory anatomy of the SP1 prover, the survey of every proving route, and the ranked path to 12 GB cards
the project lead, 5 October 2026 22:05 UTC: if the GPU-server patch does not enable 12 GB cards, research proving and see if there are different methods. docs/analysis/proving-methods.md: (1) the memory anatomy of SP1 6.8.1 from its code (the 20 GB panic in sp1-gpu builder.rs, the maximum-sized trace buffers, the mempool that never releases, the fixed recursion shape), the theoretical floor for the adopted shard (about 10 to 11 GB, approximate); (2) the survey: SP1, RISC Zero, Airbender, ZisK, OpenVM, Pico, Ziren, Stwo, Jolt, Ceno, Nexus, Valida, Powdr, Binius, the 2026 entrants, the sumcheck and GKR family, folding, continuations, distributed proving, AMD and Apple backends, every claim cited; (3) per route the change to the guest, aggregator and node verifier, the cost in agent days, the risk, and whether 12 GB under 60 s is reached; (4) the ranking: re-size SP1's server with S_p as the dial and one server per card (no consensus change), RISC Zero as version 2 for the fallback and Apple, the sumcheck family in five years; (5) the tier consequences and the public line.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 22:19:04 +00:00