From docs/analysis/horizon/economy-and-utility.md (sections 3.1, 4.1 to 4.4, proposals 2, 3, 4, 7) and
docs/analysis/horizon/consensus-security.md (finding 3, proposal 1), both on master.
(a) The litepaper's "proofs at the cost of power" and the customer brief's "priced in dollars per proof" are
conditioned: electricity is close to power, the price a prover must charge is the subsidy it forgoes, published as a
formula with network hash as the input (per shard, card hash over network hash x 0.8 x 31.688 IGN x shard seconds,
plus electricity), never a number; 100 to 300x the published market rate at the devnet's 1.16 GH/s, competitive near
100 GH/s beside the miner, approximate beyond the one card measured. Six litepaper passages and two brief rows. The
text check's P6 sentence moves to the conditioned form. Ledger E20.
(b) One threshold sentence in Governance and Mining: 60 percent of blue blocks over two weeks for a parameter genesis
leaves open, 90 percent for an upgrade (new code), 95 percent with a floor height for a class change (the Mining
section had said a 90 percent signal turns a spare defence on, which is a class change). Ledger G15.
(c) The 20% proving-pool row carries the caveat that consensus does not yet verify the carried proof, so a block
producer could claim shard pay with a false proof today (P21; the 0.3.16 fix). Ledger P24.
(d) The dev fee reads "default-on, switchable, 1 percent of the producer share" in the payment-routes row and the
Ember section; docs/plans/funding.md section 4's ceiling is 1 percent of the producer share, USD 38,520 / 154,080 /
770,400 at the three prices, corrected from 48,000 / 193,000 / 963,000. Ledger E21.
(e) The pool row's note: unclaimed pool credit is today stranded in the escrow, no rule returns it; the fix rolls it
into the next proven segment (0.3.16). Ledger P25.
site/ledger.html regenerated (176 entries); tools/ci/ledger-text-check.mjs carries the five new sentences (53, 0 missing).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verified by grep and moved to "stated": M2, M4, M7, M9, M10, M13, F5, F10, P1, P4, P6, P7, P10, E5, G1, G2, G3, G4, G6, C2, C3, C5, C6, C8, C10, C11, M18, X1, X2, X7, X8, X9, X10, D2.
Written tonight, then moved: P3 (overclaim 25 plus the certificate-half numbers), M29 (the app paragraph rewritten to Ember 0.3.9), E16 text half (the 20% is burned under igneum-proving-pool-v0, provers paid from the execution-state escrow), L9 (devnet no-value line beside every download control, the tiles), L2 text half (no "so" clause), E17 text half (100,000-gas calls, fleet-size dependence), E13 (the six-row payment-route table in the litepaper Economics and the customer brief, from docs/design/payment-routes.md), E6 (the schedule as a bet), C13 (Monero's record does not price the die), L8 (Circle's decision), X3 (August 2027 under the proofs feed), M10 (overclaim 14 applied).
docs/fud-fixes.md gains section 2.7 with one row per group. Site rebuilt with node build.mjs (the live downloads index moved the HiveOS package to 0.3.9; journey.json regenerated from the log).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/provenance.md: table of every component Igneum uses (origin, licence, what changed, why, how measured), what is new, what to adopt from upstream, own-code licence pending the project lead's decision. Licences verified on disk: rusty-kaspa ISC, chiavdf Apache-2.0, igneum-pow MIT, blake2b_simd MIT, blake3 CC0 or Apache-2.0, sha2 MIT or Apache-2.0, secp256k1 CC0, keccak Apache-2.0 or MIT. RandomX, SP1, revm, blst, ProgPoW, LWMA, Monero, GMP, sha3: approximate, not cloned.
site: litepaper gains the Built on the shoulders section and nav entry; index gains the two-line mention and footer link near the RandomX comparison; the block rate reads one block a second at launch, rising, where it read as permanent (litepaper diagram, index live section).
tools/upstream: README with the exact merge commands, expected conflict files from fork-divergence, the test list and the consensus-review rule; sync-upstream.sh fetches and opens the merge on a branch without committing. Not run against the fork.
docs/commercial/prover-customer-brief.md: one-page brief for a first proving customer at testnet, timeline from journey.json, risks, 10 candidates labelled approximate.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
