igneum-network/igneum
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Activity

Class v6 floor lane 4: the 3060 and 4070 class v5 stock rows measured (the 4070's lock takes 34 percent of its class v5 draw)

Browse source 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Documents-only replay of 82f1580ef (2a8572e489) for the box mirror master
This commit is contained in:
igneum-labs 2026-10-08 12:55:44 +00:00
parent 7c87d54d61
commit fe1935896c
1 changed files with 28 additions and 28 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

56
app/igneum-app/tiers/class-v5-tiers.json
View file

@ -521,10 +521,10 @@
"memory_gb": 12,
"label": "measured",
"stock": {
"mhs": 28.7,
"w": 102.7,
"uj": 3.58,
"class": "v3"
"mhs": 28.43,
"w": 165.5,
"uj": 5.82,
"class": "v5"
},
"tiers": [
{
@ -538,7 +538,7 @@
"mhw": 0.2851,
"source": "measured",
"label": "measured",
"uj": 3.51,
"uj": 3.58,
"note": "Ember run 6's tune point (1,863 MHz at 50 percent) under class v4 (sh256x27): 31.08 MH/s at 109.0 W, +30 W over class v3 at the same point for no rate; class v5 about 3.58; the ladder below 1,860 under class v4 is owed (band 3.2 to 3.6)"
},
{
@ -561,13 +561,13 @@
"power_pct": 100,
"mem_mhz": 0,
"limit_w": 200,
"mhs": 28.72,
"w": 106.0,
"mhw": 0.2709,
"mhs": 28.43,
"w": 165.5,
"mhw": 0.1718,
"source": "stock",
"label": "measured",
"uj": 3.69,
"note": "Ember run 6 stock on class v3 (28.72 MH/s at 106.0 W); the bench-log 5 October row 28.7 at 102.7 W (3.58); the denominator sweep's Vast 4070 (13:21 UK) read class v3 30.83 MH/s at 107.1 W (3.47) stock, class v5 30.88 MATCH"
"uj": 5.82,
"note": "class v5 measured on a Vast 4070 (13:54 UK): 28.43 MH/s at 165.5 W (5.82, 108 samples, SM 2,820, memory 9,801, a 210 W host limit not binding); class v3 28.40 at 116.3 W on the same host (the shadow +49 W = 17 pJ per op at the stock clock); Ember run 6's PC 1 stock on class v3 read 28.72 at 106.0 W; the tune point (1,860 MHz, 50 percent) under class v4 measured 31.08 at 109.0 W (3.51), so the lock takes 34 percent of this card's class v5 draw for no rate"
}
],
"src": "docs/plans/counter-asic-3-status.md item 8 (the 4070 rows, 6 October); docs/bench-log.md Ember run 6"
@ -950,10 +950,10 @@
"memory_gb": 12,
"label": "estimated",
"stock": {
"mhs": 26.89,
"w": 166.1,
"uj": 6.18,
"class": "v4"
"mhs": 26.53,
"w": 169.8,
"uj": 6.4,
"class": "v5"
},
"tiers": [
{
@ -962,12 +962,12 @@
"power_pct": 80,
"mem_mhz": 0,
"limit_w": 170,
"mhs": 26.89,
"w": 150.0,
"mhw": 0.1793,
"mhs": 26.5,
"w": 153.0,
"mhw": 0.1732,
"source": "measured",
"label": "estimated",
"uj": 5.58,
"uj": 5.77,
"note": "the Ampere cap lever (10 percent) on the measured class v4 stock row; the 3060 Ti at a 130 W host cap held 33.06 MH/s at 128.7 W under class v4 (3.89): a cap row measured on a sibling"
},
{
@ -976,12 +976,12 @@
"power_pct": 90,
"mem_mhz": 0,
"limit_w": 170,
"mhs": 26.89,
"w": 158.0,
"mhw": 0.1702,
"mhs": 26.53,
"w": 161.0,
"mhw": 0.1648,
"source": "measured",
"label": "estimated",
"uj": 5.88,
"uj": 6.07,
"note": "one power rung under stock"
},
{
@ -990,16 +990,16 @@
"power_pct": 100,
"mem_mhz": 0,
"limit_w": 170,
"mhs": 26.89,
"w": 166.1,
"mhw": 0.1619,
"mhs": 26.53,
"w": 169.8,
"mhw": 0.1562,
"source": "stock",
"label": "measured",
"uj": 6.18,
"note": "the denominator sweep's Vast 3060 (13:19 UK): class v4 26.89 MH/s at 166.1 W (6.18), v4 over v3 +44.6 percent on that host (the 7 October pod read class v3 26.89 at 111.6 W); stock measured, lock owed"
"uj": 6.4,
"note": "class v5 measured on a Vast 3060 (13:53 UK): 26.53 MH/s at 169.8 W (6.40) at the host's 170 W limit (the limit binding: the class v4 pod read 26.89 at 166.1 W, 6.18); class v3 26.53 at 120.4 W on the same host; stock, lock owed"
}
],
"src": "~/igneum-fleet/cardbench/rows.jsonl, 7 October (class v3); the sweep pending"
"src": "~/igneum-fleet/cardbench/rows.jsonl, the denominator sweep (2026-10-08-denominator-v5); stock, lock owed"
},
{
"card": "AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT",