igneum-network/igneum
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Activity

Merge master 2216068a2 into canary-db9f8db9-mac under the master-landing lock

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
igneum-labs 2026-10-09 12:22:25 +00:00
commit e778db9003
53 changed files with 1280 additions and 22 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

45
docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/proving-live.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
# Proving live on Devnet 4: the on-chain record (9 October 2026)
The 1.5x scoreboard's phase B row reads "a GPU earns the proving share of the block reward and a hash chip cannot". This page is the evidence that the proving share is paid on the live devnet to GPUs proving beside their miners, read from the chain and nothing else. One epoch is 3,600 DAA; Devnet 4's DAA runs at 1.0 per second (63,577 at 11:59:15Z to 63,902 at 12:04:30Z), so an epoch is one hour.
## The rule being exercised, by file and line (node 27f54124, the 2.0.3 line)
| what | where |
|---|---|
| 20 percent of every block subsidy to the proving pool, 80 to the producer | consensus/core/src/igneum.rs:44 (`PROVING_POOL_SHARE_PERCENT`), :87 (`proving_pool_share`) |
| a carried record pays its shard part of the pool credit to the record's payout address when valid, verified and first | igneum/exec/src/proving.rs:551 (`carried_payouts`) |
| a v1 segment (8 chain blocks, 8 shards + one aggregation) pays as one record, 1,000 bps of the credit to the aggregator | consensus/core/src/proving.rs:638 (`split_pool_credit`); igneum/exec/src/proving.rs `segment_status` Proven |
| fees v1 from DAA 0 on the devnet (the shard is the calibrated v1 size, 30,000 pgas, never the prototype) | consensus/core/src/config/params.rs:2307 (`DEVNET_PARAMS.fees_v1_activation_daa: 0`); the node reports `fees.v1ActivationDaa 0`, `shardBudget 0x7530` |
| what a prover reads and submits | `igneum_getProvingStatus`, `igneum_getAssignedShards`, `igneum_submitProofRecord`, `igneum_submitSegmentRecord`, `igneum_getSegmentRecords` (igneum/exec/src/rpc.rs:1342, :1443, :1628) |
## What proves today
The fleet's prover stack on rented RunPod and Vast boxes: `tools/fleet/box-prover.py` (one loop per box, beside the box's kit-2 miner, MINER=none so the miner is never paused) driving the served 0317 prover pair (`igneum-prove-host` sha256 71bc2438…, `igneum-prove-export` 263bf4ce…, SP1 6.8.1, shard program id 0x2b1a81cb…, aggregator id 0x474678f3…, the pair the node pins) and the SP1 GPU server. The same binaries are what the 2.0.3.1 HiveOS package wraps; the Mac and Windows apps carry the same prover, on by default at 23,552 MiB or more (app/igneum-app/src/provedefault.rs:23-24). Cards: RTX 4090 (24,564 MiB), RTX 3090 (24,576), L40S and RTX 6000 Ada (48 GB) as aggregators. Measured on a 4090 beside its miner: one 8-block segment in 117 to 185 s end to end (shards 48 to 52 s, aggregation 57 to 61 s), peak 13,523 to 14,899 MiB; a 16 GB card cannot hold the shard (the LAB's floor rows).
## Baseline before the restart (read 11:50:22Z, lp-4090-02's node, chain id 4465, executed tip 31,719, DAA 62,833)
| counter | value |
|---|---|
| paid v1 segment records since genesis | 663 = 653.93 IGN |
| distinct prover keys paid | 30 (median 4 segments a key, maximum 230) |
| payout addresses | 3 (the fleet's wallets) |
| paid v0 shard records (the pre-segment path) | 6,474 = 7,196 IGN |
| proving pool balance | 27,706 IGN |
| carried records refused as duplicates ("segment already paid") | 952 of 2,199 carried |
| carried records refused as late ("unproven", after the 600 DAA deadline) | 461 |
Evidence file: build-1:/srv/artefacts/proving-live/prov-ledger-4465-tip31719-115022Z.json (sha256 bd3f53c18c3ffa20354ea62ade9fd5e7a5794202a71c3c369a5be71484f7143a), every segment from genesis with its paid row and carried records.
Why payments had stopped at 11:15Z: Devnet 4's finality paused at 11:15:57Z under the hub roll (signing weight 4 to 25 percent of the frozen table), and every fleet prover gates on a finality pause (the 8 October build claims only below the finality-settled block; the V6-08 build holds after 600 s). The gate is the prover's own policy; payment never depended on finality (`carried_payouts`). The provers were restarted as generation 2 at 11:59Z with the gate lifted and the chain paid again from 12:02Z.
## The epoch of evidence (12:02Z to EPOCH_END)
EPOCH_TABLE
## The sentence the row carries
EPOCH_SENTENCE
## Access to proving work (main's question of 13:1x UK)
Segments are allocated by first valid record: 8 assignees per shard drawn from the keys in the record window hold a 10 DAA exclusive window (consensus/core/src/proving.rs:26, :30, :255, :305), after which any key may prove and the first valid record carried is paid; no stake, no queue; leases are off on the live nodes. A newcomer competes equally from its first record; a prover on a synced node claims within one 15-second pass (lp-4090-02 claimed 15 s after its restart). With about 227 segments an hour on this devnet and 120 to 185 s a proof, 8 to 11 provers saturate the work and every prover past that dilutes the fixed 20 percent as 1/N; about a third of carried records today are duplicate proofs. The rule change is docs/design/proving-claim-order.md (node change after 2.0.3; nothing on the chain today).

22
docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md
View file

@ -170,6 +170,28 @@ on Windows and Mac where a 32 GB NVIDIA card is present, NOT LIVE on the 24 GB t
the 4090's), 45.37 MH/s full against 39.71 for the twin (19.73 / 17.75 on the 4090). The F2 row re-run on the same pinned core:
10.440 ms per warp for the signing object at 2^30, 5.134 for the class v4 calibration (frozen-v6/f2-verifier-build5.txt).
- CONTROLS' done line (13:0x to 13:1x UK): the four controls and the ledger rows staged under build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/
with SHA256SUMS (frozen-v6 with tlb/, coop-arx, progpow-094, fishhash, sector-read, etchash, autolykos; 25 MB). Autolykos2 landed
in-house and bit-exact (hashlib reference against the CUDA harness at N = 65,536 and at Ergo's live N = 227,251,815, 7.27 GB;
216.2 / 201.8 MH/s full / twin on the rented 4090; the live-block end-to-end row owed). coop-arx's OpenCL text F1-complete on two
OpenCL platforms at all five chain lengths (the AMD tier runs the moment a card is reachable; Metal owed). Open on that lane: the
knee rows (every rented pod refuses the lock; COHORT's VM-host lock hunt reports by 14:30), the Metal text, the Ergo live-block row.
- ADVERSARY (12:5x to 13:0x): phase B tier rows on the on-chain read (commit 82330b04c; 47f16b86f with Etchash on the mirror): the
24 GB-and-up NVIDIA tier on Windows and Mac LIVE on Devnet 4 and out-earning the board chip in phase B (the GPU's contribution per
TH after electricity 0.341 against the chip's 0.288 after its recurring cost at ten cents on the flat path); HiveOS NOT LIVE until
the 2.0.3.1 package; the 16 GB tier never (mining share only, 0.046 per TH behind the chip). ctl-etchash as a control (64 x 128 B
reads over about 3.3 GB) with the calibration line: the modelled DRAM board 765 nJ per hash against the shipped Antminer E9 Pro's
598 (3,680 MH/s at 2,200 W, the public figure as the ledger lane quotes it): the model 1.28x pessimistic for the chip, a witness.
Phase A and B for Ravencoin, Ethereum Classic and Iron Fish in their own units (commit d7db3e596, README section 14): no fleet
recovers a board chip's spend on any of the three on any path (each chain's 24-month mining emission under one design cost: RVN
about USD 2.9 M, IRON 1.4 M, ETC 83 M at a 10,000-board fleet); phase B with no prover income: on Ravencoin the chip's operating
advantage stands in full at USD 0.123 per TH; on ETC the mining revenue per TH (0.0087) is below the board's recurring cost (0.031)
and the E9 Pro's electricity alone (0.017), a loss on both sides at ten cents. The reading: on every chain in the set the board
chip's phase B advantage is real and its phase A recovery is not at today's emissions; the proving share is the one term that lets
Igneum's live GPU tier out-earn the chip in phase B.
- The boxes (the build steward, 13:1x): the lab's ended box runs' pid files removed as stale after each pid's command line was read
dead; the steward's defaults on build-4, build-5 and build-6 stand until a lane claims with a live pid file.
## Open rows (NOT RUN)
| row | owner | clock |

157
docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/ledger/README.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
# The GPU network ledger (the 1.5x laboratory, LEDGER lane, 9 October 2026)
Every live GPU-mined chain the lab could pin, measured the same way on the same rented cards in the same sessions, with the same
adversary method applied to each, ranked on (a) the same-node chip-to-GPU energy edge under the lab's convention, (b) the same
under ProgPoW's own premise, and (c) the two-phase economics with each chain's ACTUAL reward split (only Igneum pays a share of
every block to provers). Every number is MEASURED or WITNESS with its source on the row; a number that does not exist yet reads
"pending" with the lane that owes it, never blank; a chain the lab could not run in-house reads NOT RUN with the reason.
The data lives in `ledger.json` beside this file; every table here, on the public page (`docs/ledger/gpu-ledger.md`, served at
/gpu-ledger) and in the reproduction kit is rendered from it by `tools/ledger/render.mjs`, so no two copies of a row can drift.
The public page carries the same tables with less of the lane bookkeeping.
<!-- ledger:stamp:start -->
Data: ledger.json, stamp 2026-10-09, adversarial set v3 (build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/ (README.md, design-notes/adversarial-sets-v1-v2-v3.md, rows/, SHA256SUMS); set v3 commit b2b9ee0b9 on class-v6-adversary).
<!-- ledger:stamp:end -->
## 1. The method (the same for every chain)
1. **The object.** Each chain's proof of work as its own pinned reference code, built in-house from source (the in-house rule: no
downloaded miner binary; the CONTROLS lane's pins with commit ids and sha256s on build-1 under /srv/artefacts/lab/controls/).
Igneum: the frozen class v6 at the live 4 GiB dataset. Ravencoin: the official ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference kernel (KAWPOW is
ProgPoW 0.9.4 with Ravencoin's constants, so the official kernel at Raven's DAG size is a labelled PROXY). Firo: the same row
(FiroPoW differs from KAWPOW in its constants only). Iron Fish: the FishHash reference library and a bit-exact CUDA port. Ethereum
Classic: the ethash hashimoto of the pinned chfast/ethash library at ETC's current epoch. Ergo: NOT RUN (the reason on the row).
2. **The card rows** (the COHORT lane, the lab's measurement recipe, interface section 1): one rented RTX 4090 and one rented RTX
5090, both on uncapped hosts, every chain back to back in ONE session per card at stock; board power from `nvidia-smi` at 1 Hz
(the mean from 8 s in to the end, idle not subtracted); the rate from the harness's own counter; nJ per hash = W / MH/s x 1,000;
three timed runs per cell, the median served with the spread; `clocks_sm_median` and the dataset size on every row; the
read-only twin (the same reads, the arithmetic cut) where the harness has one, giving f = J_twin / J_full, the card's memory
share. Rented containers refuse clock locks, so every row is stock; the Igneum knee rows exist only in the record.
3. **The chip rows** (the ADVERSARY lane, adversarial set v3): for each chain the cheapest credible specialist on the same node, a
complete machine (die, memory, board, PSU and host terms), modelled and labelled WITNESS; the same-node DRAM board is the energy
row, the SRAM die the residual (coexistence) row. Two conventions beside every ratio: **ours** (the cheapest programmable core,
fused where the work allows, register file sized to the work, instruction convention) and **ProgPoW's premise** (the chip must
keep a GPU-class datapath, so its edge is the compute term's 1.1x to 1.2x weighted by the card's measured memory share f).
4. **The real chip.** Ethereum Classic is the one chain on the ledger with a chip on the market, the Antminer E9 Pro; its public
rate and power go on the row as a WITNESS and the modelled DRAM board for Etchash goes beside it as the model's calibration
line: the row says how close the model's ratio sits to the ratio from the public figures.
5. **The two phases** (the lab's rulings 8c.5 and 8c.11): phase A, can a chip maker recover its spend before investment under
growing, flat and falling price paths; phase B, with the spend sunk, who exits first on operating cost, with the chain's actual
reward split: a GPU on Igneum earns the mining share plus the proving share (80 / 20 ratified), a hash chip the mining share
only; on every other chain the GPU's share is mining only (100 / 0), so the second-income term is zero by construction.
6. **The ranking rule.** Rank (a) ascending on the same-node DRAM board ratio under our convention at the WORSE of the two cards
(the lower ratio is the smaller chip edge); (b) ascending on the ProgPoW-premise ratio at the same cell; (c) phase B: whether
the chain's GPUs earn an income a hash chip cannot. A chain with any pending or proxy cell in a column is ranked provisionally
in that column and says so; a NOT RUN chain is unranked. PASS is never written; the ranking is the rows' order, nothing more.
## 2. The card rows (MEASURED; board power; stock)
<!-- ledger:cards:start -->
| chain | algorithm | dataset on the row | reward split (mining / proving) | RTX 4090 stock: nJ per hash (MH/s, W, f) | RTX 5090 stock: nJ per hash (MH/s, W, f) | twin | sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igneum | class v6, the live signing object 0x2a1d6caab4c24564 (2.0 devnet, chain id 4465) | 4.29 GB (4,294,967,296 bytes); 2^30 words, the live policy (70a6c703); 256 random 4-byte reads per hash, 62,120 instructions per hash (instruction convention) | 80 / 20 (the Token Value volume on master (D04, token-value/README.md: the 80/20 emission allocation); PROVING_POOL_SHARE_PERCENT) | 8,369 MEASURED (30.67 MH/s, 256.7 W, f 0.848; spread 0.67%; vast 55009211, driver 580; stock (the pod refused -lgc); clocks_sm_median pending the ledger session) | 5,597 MEASURED (68.66 MH/s, 384.3 W, f 0.811; spread 2.11%; vast 55006481, driver 580; stock (the pod refused -lgc); the host cap 500 W, the card drew 384) | yes (the same address stream, the arithmetic cut) | RTX 4090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/ctl-v6/vast-55009211/ (rows.jsonl, SHA256SUMS); the cohort table build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/cohort/TABLE.md; RTX 5090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/ctl-v6/vast-55006481/; the cohort table build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/cohort/TABLE.md |
| Ravencoin | KAWPOW (ProgPoW 0.9.4 with Ravencoin's kiss99 constants, 7,500-block epochs and a 512-parent DAG; live since block 1,219,736, 6 May 2020) | 6.18 GB (6,182,403,712 bytes); KAWPOW's current DAG size at Ravencoin height 4,573,707 (epoch 609, read 13:0x UK): the official ProgPoW 0.9.4 kernel built at Ethash block 18,270,000 (epoch 609, the same byte count), harness progpow-094/gpu/pp_harness_18270000; KAWPOW's own constants NOT applied, so the row is 'ProgPoW 0.9.4 official at KAWPOW's DAG size (proxy)'; 64 coalesced 256-byte reads per hash; F1 GPU = CPU on both nonces (cpu/vectors-094-kawpow-size-18270000.txt) | 100 / 0 (Ravencoin's block reward goes to the miner in full (no second income to GPUs)) | 6,920 MEASURED (prior row: kawpowminer, not the pinned kernel; a PROXY until the ledger session's pinned-kernel row lands) (58.95 MH/s, 409.0 W, f none; spread none; RunPod, the comparative lane a2ed5c31; stock) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session) | yes, by construction (progpow-094/gpu/pp_twin 18270000 26 250: the 64 dependent entry reads per 16-lane hash) | RTX 4090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/rows.md (the ctl-progpow-094 section, card rows) |
| Firo | FiroPoW (ProgPoW 0.9.4 with Firo's constants; live since block 419,264, 26 October 2021) | = Ravencoin's row | 100 / 0 | = Ravencoin's row | = Ravencoin's row | as Ravencoin | as KAWPOW: the pinned ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference; FiroPoW differs from KAWPOW only in its constants and DAG schedule, so the lab serves ONE row for both and says so |
| Iron Fish | FishHash (live since hardfork 1, April 2024) | 4.83 GB (4,831,835,776 bytes); 37,748,717 items of 128 bytes, FIXED (no epochs); 96 random 128-byte reads per hash, 9,856 lane-instructions | 100 / 0 (Iron Fish's block reward is mining only) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session); CONTROLS' rate-only read 19.73 MH/s at stock, no sampler (rate only 19.73 MH/s) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session); CONTROLS' rate-only sm_120 read 45.37 MH/s full, 39.71 twin, F1 PASS (rate only 45.37 MH/s) | yes (a trace replay of the kernel's own item indexes; its energy read as a bound: the twin runs 10 percent slower than the full kernel) | RTX 4090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/fishhash/gpu/bench-4090.log; RTX 5090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/fishhash/ (fishhash.md) |
| Ethereum Classic | Etchash (Ethash with ECIP-1099's 60,000-block epochs; live since block 11,700,000, November 2020) | 4.64 GB (4,638,898,816 bytes); ETC height 25,502,946 (read 12:5x UK) = Etchash epoch 425 (ECIP-1099: height / 60,000), the harness's block argument 12,750,000 (the Ethash epoch with the same size table index); 64 coalesced 128-byte reads per hash (two 64-byte half-mixes); CONTROLS' rate-only read on a 4090 at stock 29.90 MH/s full and 29.90 twin (memory-bound) | 100 / 0 (ETC's block reward is mining only) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the harness staged 13:0x UK); CONTROLS' rate-only read 29.90 MH/s (rate only 29.90 MH/s) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the sm_120 build from etchash/src) | yes, by construction | RTX 4090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/etchash/ (etchash.md) |
| Ergo | Autolykos2 (k = 32, n = 26, Blake2b-256; the table grows 5 percent every 51,200 blocks) | 7.27 GB (7,272,058,080 bytes); the live table at Ergo height 1,890,820 (api.ergoplatform.com, 13:0x UK): N = 227,251,815 elements of 32 bytes (+5 percent at height 1,894,400; the row names its height); 33 random 32-byte reads per hash; the table builds on the device in 1.5 s; CONTROLS' rate-only read on a 4090 at stock 216.2 MH/s full, 201.8 twin | 100 / 0 (Ergo's block reward is mining only) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the harness staged 13:1x UK); CONTROLS' rate-only read 216.2 MH/s full, 201.8 twin (rate only 216.20 MH/s) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the sm_120 build from src) | yes (a trace replay) | RTX 4090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/autolykos/ (autolykos.md) |
<!-- ledger:cards:end -->
## 3. The chip-to-GPU edge, both conventions (WITNESS chip rows over MEASURED card rows)
<!-- ledger:edge:start -->
| chain | the cheapest credible same-node DRAM board (set v3, nJ per hash, band) | ratio at the RTX 4090 stock (ours) | ratio at the RTX 5090 stock (ours) | ProgPoW-premise ratio at the RTX 4090 | ProgPoW-premise ratio at the RTX 5090 | the die as the residual (nJ; ratio at the worse card) | real chip on the market | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igneum | 1,542 (1,329 to 1,941); GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; split memory 527 / ALU 166 / tax 849; WITNESS (modelled, complete machine, instruction convention) | 5.43x (4.31 to 6.30) | 3.63x (2.88 to 4.21) | 1.01x to 1.03x (f 0.853 measured) | 1.02x to 1.03x (f 0.811 measured on the stock pod) | 335 (N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row); 25.0x | none on the market | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ledger-rows.md and ledger-rows.json (class-v6-adversary 47f16b86f); build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/ctl-v6.json and rows.md (set v3, 2026-10-09T11:33Z); the die 12.0x at the 5090 knee, USD 0.77 per MH/s |
| Ravencoin | 1,757 (1,453 to 2,147); GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; bandwidth-bound at 16 KB per hash (93 MH/s per board); split memory 647 / ALU and tax per rows.md; WITNESS (modelled on the kawpowminer census as the work proxy until CONTROLS' trace replaces it) | 3.94x (3.22 to 4.76) | pending | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; no measured twin on this kernel yet) | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured) | 697 (N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row (USD 1.89 per MH/s); the cheapest specialist of any kind is near-memory base dies at 669 nJ); 9.9x | none on the market | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ledger-rows.md and ledger-rows.json (class-v6-adversary 47f16b86f); build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/ctl-progpow-094.json (set v3) |
| Firo (= Ravencoin's row) | 1,757 (1,453 to 2,147); GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; bandwidth-bound at 16 KB per hash (93 MH/s per board); split memory 647 / ALU and tax per rows.md; WITNESS (modelled on the kawpowminer census as the work proxy until CONTROLS' trace replaces it) | 3.94x (3.22 to 4.76) | pending | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; no measured twin on this kernel yet) | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured) | 697 (N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row (USD 1.89 per MH/s); the cheapest specialist of any kind is near-memory base dies at 669 nJ); 9.9x | none on the market | = Ravencoin's row |
| Iron Fish | 1,051 (881 to 1,257); GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; bandwidth-bound at 124 MH/s per board; 95 percent of the board's energy is the memory path; split memory 529 / ALU 46 / tax 503; WITNESS (modelled; the card's cell pending, so the ratio is pending) | pending | pending | pending (needs the measured f from the twin) | pending | 170 (full SRAM dies (three N2 reticles) + sized + fused operations); pending | none on the market | build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/ctl-fishhash.json and rows.md (set v3) |
| Ethereum Classic | 765 (638 to 919); GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; USD 3.25 per MH/s; split per ledger-rows.md; WITNESS (modelled; the card cells pending, so the ratios are pending) | pending | pending | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured) | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure) | 177 (N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row); pending | Bitmain Antminer E9 Pro: 3,680 MH/s at 2,200 W = 598 nJ per hash, WITNESS (a manufacturer's published figure, not measured by the lab); Bitmain's stated figures as listed on minerstat's hardware page (https://minerstat.com/hardware/antminer-e9-pro): 3.68 GH/s on Ethash at 2,200 W, release 2023-02; 2,200 W / 3,680 MH/s = 0.598 J per MH = 598 nJ per hash | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ledger-rows.md and ledger-rows.json (class-v6-adversary 47f16b86f, wording 82330b04c) |
| Ergo | pending: pending (ADVERSARY: the chip rows from CONTROLS' trace; default 15:00 UK, else pending (adversary)) | pending | pending | pending | pending | pending | none on the market | pending |
<!-- ledger:edge:end -->
## 4. The two phases with each chain's actual split
<!-- ledger:phases:start -->
| chain | split | phase A (before investment) | phase B (spend sunk) | an income a hash chip cannot earn | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igneum | 80 / 20 | before investment (24 months, the mining share 80 percent of the year-1 subsidy): the same-node board maker recovers its spend on NO fleet from 100 to 100 M boards on the growing or flat price path (100,000 boards: net USD -55.4 M on 58.8 M revenue growing; -37.6 M on 76.6 M flat); only the falling path pays it; the N2 die recovers on no path | spend sunk, flat path at USD 0.10 per kWh, the chip at 10 percent of the hash: mining revenue USD 0.354 per TH; the GPU's proving income at the ratified 20 percent share USD 0.098 per TH against the board chip's operating advantage USD 0.046 per TH (GPU electricity 0.111 less the chip's electricity, hosting and maintenance 0.066): the GPU out-earns the built board chip; the cancelling proving share 9 percent (board), 13 (hybrid), 20 (die) | yes by rule (the proving share of every block, 20 percent ratified); LIVE ON DEVNET with on-chain paid records (663 paid v1 segment records to 30 prover keys on chain 4465, the PROVING LIVE lane's file bd3f53c1 on build-1), not yet in a shipped package | build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/rows.md (the two-phase section), ADVERSARY commit 545f3f8a0; ctl-v6-coexistence.json; WITNESS; phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package runs a prover |
| Ravencoin | 100 / 0 | before investment: no fleet from 100 to 100 M machines recovers a board chip's spend on any path, because Ravencoin's whole mining emission over 24 months (about USD 2.9 M at the public price) sits below one USD 35 M design cost; 10,000 boards would take 56 percent of the 721 GH/s network and earn USD 1.6 M to 2.4 M against a USD 44 M spend | spend sunk, mining only: mining revenue USD 0.064 per TH of the chain's own hashes; the board chip's recurring cost USD 0.069 per TH at ten cents; the chip's operating advantage over the RTX 4090 at stock (6,920 nJ) USD 0.123 per TH (the GPU's electricity 0.192 less the chip's 0.069) stands in full, no prover income | no (the block reward is mining only) | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ctl-progpow-094-coexistence.json (rows[].phase_a, rows[].phase_b_split; method lab/adv/README.md section 14), ADVERSARY commit d7db3e596 on class-v6-adversary; WITNESS, the chain's own units, the 100/0 split, the same 24-month life, design cost and fleet rule as v6, the three price paths (flat at the public price, x2 growing, x0.5 falling, the hash held); the public lines on the row |
| Firo | 100 / 0 | as KAWPOW | as KAWPOW | no | as KAWPOW; = KAWPOW's row at a 100/0 split |
| Iron Fish | 100 / 0 | before investment: no fleet from 100 to 100 M machines recovers a board chip's spend on any path; Iron Fish's whole mining emission over 24 months is about USD 1.4 M at the public price (10,000 boards would take 84 percent of the hash for USD 1.1 M to 1.6 M) | spend sunk, mining only: mining revenue USD 0.086 per TH of the chain's own hashes; the board chip's recurring cost USD 0.043 per TH at ten cents; the GPU side NOT RUN until the card cell lands; no prover income by construction | no | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ctl-fishhash-coexistence.json, ADVERSARY commit d7db3e596 on class-v6-adversary; WITNESS, the chain's own units, the 100/0 split, the same life, design cost, fleet rule and price paths as v6; the GPU side of phase B NOT RUN until COHORT's card rows |
| Ethereum Classic | 100 / 0 | before investment: no fleet from 100 to 100 M machines recovers a board chip's spend on any path; ETC's whole mining emission over 24 months is about USD 83 M at the public price, but 10,000 boards are 2 percent of 120.9 TH/s and earn USD 1.0 M to 1.5 M, and 100,000 boards (13 percent) USD 9 M to 13 M against a USD 150 M spend | spend sunk, mining only: mining revenue USD 0.0087 per TH of the chain's own hashes, below even the modelled board's recurring cost (USD 0.031 per TH) and below the E9 Pro's own electricity at ten cents (598 nJ = USD 0.017 per TH): at the public figures nobody mines ETC at a profit at ten cents and phase B is a loss on both sides; the GPU side NOT RUN until the card cell lands | no | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ctl-etchash-coexistence.json, ADVERSARY commit d7db3e596 on class-v6-adversary; WITNESS, the chain's own units, the 100/0 split, the same life, design cost, fleet rule and price paths as v6; the GPU side of phase B NOT RUN until COHORT's card rows |
| Ergo | 100 / 0 | pending (ADVERSARY) | pending (ADVERSARY); no prover income by construction | no | pending; pending (ADVERSARY at the 100/0 split, the public line on the row) |
<!-- ledger:phases:end -->
## 5. The ranking
<!-- ledger:ranking:start -->
**(a) Ours, the same-node DRAM board at the worse card (the smaller chip edge first):**
No order in this column yet: a cross-chain comparison is made only between cells from the same card, state and session, and the measured cells today come from 2 sessions (lab-cohort-ctl-v6 (COHORT, 11:49 to 12:30 UK, one chain); comparative-lane a2ed5c31 (RunPod, one chain, an earlier session)); the ledger session (both cards, every chain back to back) fills it. Each chain's own number, same card and state, as it stands:
- Igneum: RTX 4090 stock 5.43x (4.31 to 6.30); RTX 5090 stock 3.63x (2.88 to 4.21)
- Ravencoin: RTX 4090 stock 3.94x (3.22 to 4.76); RTX 5090 stock pending (a pending or proxy cell in this row)
- Iron Fish: unranked in this column (no measured card cell yet)
- Ethereum Classic: unranked in this column (no measured card cell yet)
- Ergo: unranked in this column (no measured card cell yet)
**(b) ProgPoW's premise (the chip keeps a GPU-class datapath):**
- Igneum: RTX 4090 1.01x to 1.03x (f 0.853 measured); RTX 5090 1.02x to 1.03x (f 0.811 measured on the stock pod)
- Ravencoin: RTX 4090 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; no measured twin on this kernel yet); RTX 5090 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured)
- Iron Fish: RTX 4090 pending (needs the measured f from the twin); RTX 5090 pending
- Ethereum Classic: RTX 4090 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured); RTX 5090 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure)
- Ergo: RTX 4090 pending; RTX 5090 pending
**(c) Phase B, an income a hash chip cannot earn:**
- Igneum: yes by rule (the proving share of every block, 20 percent ratified); LIVE ON DEVNET with on-chain paid records (663 paid v1 segment records to 30 prover keys on chain 4465, the PROVING LIVE lane's file bd3f53c1 on build-1), not yet in a shipped package
- Ravencoin: no (the block reward is mining only)
- Firo: no
- Iron Fish: no
- Ethereum Classic: no
- Ergo: no
<!-- ledger:ranking:end -->
## 6. The claim under test, clause by clause
The sentence the ledger was ordered to carry, in exactly these words and nothing stronger, is served as the claim UNDER TEST with
each clause labelled by its state on the current rows; it reads as established only when every clause is SUPPORTED. The fifth
review's ruling stands (interface 8c.9): a comparative sentence needs the comparative row, and this ledger is that row.
<!-- ledger:claim:start -->
**The headline, built from the supported clauses only:** under ProgPoW's own convention, the lowest measured chip-to-GPU edge of the chains on this ledger; and the only chain on this ledger whose GPUs are paid, by rule, an income a hash chip cannot earn (LIVE ON DEVNET, on-chain records (the PROVING LIVE lane, read 11:50:22Z 9 October 2026): on chain id 4465 (the Igneum 2.0 devnet) 663 paid v1 segment records (8 shards plus aggregation each) = 653.93 IGN paid from the proving pool to 30 distinct prover keys across chain blocks 3,000 to 30,687 (tip 31,719 at the read), plus 6,474 paid v0 shard records = 7,196 IGN; read by igneum_getProvingStatus, igneum_getSegmentRecords (3,965 segments) and igneum_getSegment; evidence build-1:/srv/artefacts/proving-live/prov-ledger-4465-tip31719-115022Z.json sha256 bd3f53c18c3ffa20354ea62ade9fd5e7a5794202a71c3c369a5be71484f7143a. NOT YET LIVE IN A SHIPPED PACKAGE: the payees are the fleet's prover stack (the same binaries the 2.0.3.1 HiveOS package wraps, cut 18:00 UK); the apps' prover is on by default on 24 GB cards but no app-proved record is on the record yet; a full-epoch line follows by 16:00 UK).
The sentence as ordered, served as the claim under test: "the lowest measured chip-to-GPU edge of any live GPU network under a published method, on both conventions, and the only one whose GPUs earn income a chip cannot"
Rule: the headline reads only what the like-for-like rows support, clause by clause (main's ruling, 13:2x UK 9 October 2026); under the ledger's own convention the measured edge per chain on the same card and state is stated as numbers, with no ranking word until the rows say so after the ledger session.
| clause | convention | state on the current rows | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| under ProgPoW's own convention, the lowest measured chip-to-GPU edge of the chains on this ledger | ProgPoW's premise (a chip that keeps a GPU-class datapath) | SUPPORTED on the current rows | Igneum v6 1.01x to 1.03x (its measured f 0.81 to 0.85) against ProgPoW's own 1.10x to 1.20x for KAWPOW and FiroPoW; FishHash and Etchash pending their twins |
| under the ledger's convention (the cheapest credible programmable specialist, adversarial set v3), each chain's measured edge on the same card and state, as numbers | ours | NUMBERS ONLY; no ranking until the ledger session (COHORT, both cards, every chain back to back, the pinned 0.9.4 kernel, twins; 14:45 UK) | the current cells come from different sessions (the lab's cohort pods for v6, the comparative lane's pod for KAWPOW) and a cross-chain comparison is made only between cells from the same card, state and session; at the RTX 4090 at stock the cells read v6 5.4x (5.67x on the second pod) and KAWPOW 3.9x (a proxy row from an earlier session); FishHash and Etchash pending |
| and the only chain on this ledger whose GPUs are paid, by rule, an income a hash chip cannot earn | phase B, each chain's actual reward split | LABELLED BY THE PROVING LIVE LANE | the proving share (20 percent ratified) is paid to GPUs for work a hash chip cannot do; every other chain on the ledger pays mining only; the live state of that income is the PROVING LIVE lane's evidence line |
Withdrawn: the earlier line 'KAWPOW and FiroPoW read 5 to 6x on the measured 4090 rows and v6 reads 2.35x' is withdrawn: it compared v6 at the 5090's 1,300 MHz knee with KAWPOW at the 4090 at stock, two cards and two states; the like-for-like cells are the ones on this ledger.
The last clause's label from the PROVING LIVE lane: LIVE ON DEVNET, on-chain records (the PROVING LIVE lane, read 11:50:22Z 9 October 2026): on chain id 4465 (the Igneum 2.0 devnet) 663 paid v1 segment records (8 shards plus aggregation each) = 653.93 IGN paid from the proving pool to 30 distinct prover keys across chain blocks 3,000 to 30,687 (tip 31,719 at the read), plus 6,474 paid v0 shard records = 7,196 IGN; read by igneum_getProvingStatus, igneum_getSegmentRecords (3,965 segments) and igneum_getSegment; evidence build-1:/srv/artefacts/proving-live/prov-ledger-4465-tip31719-115022Z.json sha256 bd3f53c18c3ffa20354ea62ade9fd5e7a5794202a71c3c369a5be71484f7143a. NOT YET LIVE IN A SHIPPED PACKAGE: the payees are the fleet's prover stack (the same binaries the 2.0.3.1 HiveOS package wraps, cut 18:00 UK); the apps' prover is on by default on 24 GB cards but no app-proved record is on the record yet; a full-epoch line follows by 16:00 UK
<!-- ledger:claim:end -->
## 7. The reproduction kit
build-1:/srv/artefacts/ledger/<stamp>/ (the stamp and the sha256 of the kit on the row below when it lands): the pinned controls
(the frozen v6 pack and twin, the ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference harness, the FishHash harness, the Etchash harness when staged), the
gen-6 Igneum worker, the lab's sampler and session script, the chain references by commit and sha, SHA256SUMS, and a README with
one command per card and the expected rows within their bands (ROWS.md, rendered from ledger.json). Anyone with a 4090 can run it.
| item | state |
|---|---|
| the kit on build-1 | pending (16:30 UK clock) |
| the kit's sha256 | pending |
| the public page | pending (17:30 UK clock; /gpu-ledger) |
## 8. Faults and corrections (reported once)
| when (UK) | what | state |
|---|---|---|
| 13:1x | the brief's "Ravencoin's own 1.5x claim" has no source in the pinned ProgPoW text (the README states 1.1x to 1.2x); the row carries the README's figure and the brief's figure as NOT FOUND | on the row |
| 13:1x | the earlier like-for-like line ("KAWPOW 5 to 6x against v6 2.35x") compared v6 at the 5090 knee with KAWPOW at the 4090 stock; at the same cell (4090 stock, set v3) the rows read v6 5.4x against KAWPOW 3.9x (proxy), so clause (a) of the claim is NOT SUPPORTED on today's rows | reported to main 13:1x; the ledger session's pinned-kernel rows decide |
| 13:0x | the lab's cohort cells stand in for the ledger session's cells until COHORT's back-to-back rows land (clock 14:45) | pending |

195
docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/ledger/ledger.json Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
{
"title": "The GPU network ledger",
"stamp": "2026-10-09",
"adversarial_set": "v3",
"adversarial_set_source": "build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/ (README.md, design-notes/adversarial-sets-v1-v2-v3.md, rows/, SHA256SUMS); set v3 commit b2b9ee0b9 on class-v6-adversary",
"cards": [
{"id": "4090", "name": "RTX 4090", "state": "stock", "note": "uncapped host (450 of 450 W)"},
{"id": "5090", "name": "RTX 5090", "state": "stock", "note": "uncapped host (575 or 600 W at default)"}
],
"ranking_rule": "Rank (a) ascending on the same-node DRAM board ratio under the ledger's convention at the WORSE of the two cards (the lower ratio is the smaller chip edge); (b) ascending on the ProgPoW-premise ratio at the same cell; (c) phase B: whether the chain's GPUs earn an income a hash chip cannot. A cross-chain comparison is made only between cells from the SAME card, the SAME state and the SAME session (main's ruling, 13:2x UK 9 October 2026); until the ledger session's cells exist the (a) column shows each chain's own number and no order. A chain with any pending or proxy cell in a column is ranked provisionally in that column and says so; a NOT RUN chain is unranked.",
"mechanism": {
"title": "Why the two honest-convention edges differ: the shape of the memory traffic",
"rows": [
{"chain": "Igneum v6", "traffic": "256 dependent random reads of one 32-byte sector each per hash over 4 GiB (8 KB moved, 1 KB consumed); the card is activation-bound: 7.86 G sector reads per second on the 4090 at its tFAW form, 17.6 G on the 5090", "card_cost": "27 to 31 nJ per random sector read all-in on the 4090 at stock (X7 and the sector-read rows); the ALU runs in the reads' shadow (f 0.85)", "chip_cost": "about 2.1 nJ per read on the chip's own GDDR7 board (1.2 on HBM3, 0.7 beside the bank): s = 12.8", "consequence": "the chip's edge on random reads is the largest of any term in the model; a read-dominated object carries it in full"},
{"chain": "Ravencoin KAWPOW (and FiroPoW)", "traffic": "64 coalesced 256-byte DAG entries per 16-lane hash = 16 KB streamed per hash; the card is bandwidth-bound (1.03 TB/s at 62.6 MH/s on the 4090; 93 MH/s per modelled board)", "card_cost": "a coalesced 256-byte read costs the card far less per byte than a scattered sector (modelled 35 nJ per 256-byte entry against 27 nJ per 32-byte sector)", "chip_cost": "the chip streams the same bytes at the same DRAM bandwidth bound; its gain is on the per-byte energy and the 18 random-math ops per loop (a GPU-class datapath on the premise, fused lanes under ours)", "consequence": "a smaller memory-term gap, so a smaller honest-convention edge at the same card; the price is a DAG that grows (8.38 GB at Ethereum's epoch 871 for the control) and a 16 KB stream per hash"},
{"chain": "Iron Fish FishHash", "traffic": "96 random 128-byte lines per hash over a fixed 4.83 GB (12 KB per hash, every byte consumed): between the two shapes (four sectors per activation)", "card_cost": "pending the measured cell (CONTROLS' rate-only read 242 GB/s of lines at 19.73 MH/s on the 4090)", "chip_cost": "95 percent of the modelled board's energy is its memory path", "consequence": "the ratio is pending its card cell"},
{"chain": "Ethereum Classic Etchash", "traffic": "64 loops of two 64-byte half-mixes = 128-byte coalesced reads per hash over the epoch DAG; bandwidth-bound", "card_cost": "pending", "chip_cost": "the one chip that exists (the E9 Pro) on this shape", "consequence": "the calibration line"}
],
"note": "Stated as the mechanism, not as a mitigation: the lab's X7 verdict is that no read-dominated design reaches a small edge against a chip with its own memory on the same node, and the ledger shows the shape of each chain's traffic beside its ratio so a reader sees where each number comes from."
},
"chains": [
{
"id": "igneum-v6",
"chain": "Igneum",
"algorithm": "class v6, the live signing object 0x2a1d6caab4c24564 (2.0 devnet, chain id 4465)",
"control": "ctl-v6",
"pin": "tree 1a938abe4; pack x1-ctrl-ds30.tgz sha256 7606c13d92546e44feef485fde25716a206643e6466ef5d5251d41354eee9532; read-only twin x1-ctrl-ds30-readonly.tgz 7629ed9598c0297533c03d4a9cbd83338d47a7693a26dc8b86566f3f0982174b; worker igneum-worker-cuda-gen6 804a6f7fea10a62e07cf6cd01e99331de5149e683112b5870fc25d1e11e199bd (COHORT's rows on worker f5f3846c, kit bf9b85d6); build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/frozen-v6/",
"dataset_bytes": 4294967296,
"dataset_note": "2^30 words, the live policy (70a6c703); 256 random 4-byte reads per hash, 62,120 instructions per hash (instruction convention)",
"twin": "yes (the same address stream, the arithmetic cut)",
"split": {"mining": 80, "proving": 20, "source": "the Token Value volume on master (D04, token-value/README.md: the 80/20 emission allocation); PROVING_POOL_SHARE_PERCENT"},
"own_claim": "none published as a number; the lab's X0 record: the same-node DRAM board 2.35x at the 5090 knee (set v0), 2.60x (set v3)",
"cells": {
"4090": {"status": "MEASURED", "session": "lab-cohort-ctl-v6 (COHORT, 11:49 to 12:30 UK, one chain)", "nj": 8368.9, "mhs": 30.673, "w": 256.7, "f": 0.848, "twin_nj": 7098.9, "spread_pct": 0.67, "clock": "stock (the pod refused -lgc); clocks_sm_median pending the ledger session", "pod": "vast 55009211, driver 580", "source": "build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/ctl-v6/vast-55009211/ (rows.jsonl, SHA256SUMS); the cohort table build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/cohort/TABLE.md", "note": "the lab's cohort cell (median of three); the second uncapped 4090 (vast 55006526) read 8,751; the ledger session's own row replaces this cell when it lands"},
"5090": {"status": "MEASURED", "session": "lab-cohort-ctl-v6 (COHORT, 11:49 to 12:30 UK, one chain)", "nj": 5597.1, "mhs": 68.661, "w": 384.3, "f": 0.811, "twin_nj": 4537.6, "spread_pct": 2.11, "clock": "stock (the pod refused -lgc); the host cap 500 W, the card drew 384", "pod": "vast 55006481, driver 580", "source": "build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/ctl-v6/vast-55006481/; the cohort table build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/cohort/TABLE.md", "note": "the lab's cohort cell; the ledger session's uncapped-host row replaces it when it lands"}
},
"adversary": {
"status": "WITNESS (modelled, complete machine, instruction convention)",
"board": {"low": 1329, "nominal": 1542, "high": 1941, "design": "GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5", "split_nj": "memory 527 / ALU 166 / tax 849"},
"die": {"nominal": 335, "design": "N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row"},
"premise": {"4090": "1.01x to 1.03x (f 0.853 measured)", "5090": "1.02x to 1.03x (f 0.811 measured on the stock pod)"},
"source": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ledger-rows.md and ledger-rows.json (class-v6-adversary 47f16b86f); build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/ctl-v6.json and rows.md (set v3, 2026-10-09T11:33Z); the die 12.0x at the 5090 knee, USD 0.77 per MH/s"
},
"real_chip": null,
"phases": {
"status": "WITNESS; phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package runs a prover",
"A": "before investment (24 months, the mining share 80 percent of the year-1 subsidy): the same-node board maker recovers its spend on NO fleet from 100 to 100 M boards on the growing or flat price path (100,000 boards: net USD -55.4 M on 58.8 M revenue growing; -37.6 M on 76.6 M flat); only the falling path pays it; the N2 die recovers on no path",
"B": "spend sunk, flat path at USD 0.10 per kWh, the chip at 10 percent of the hash: mining revenue USD 0.354 per TH; the GPU's proving income at the ratified 20 percent share USD 0.098 per TH against the board chip's operating advantage USD 0.046 per TH (GPU electricity 0.111 less the chip's electricity, hosting and maintenance 0.066): the GPU out-earns the built board chip; the cancelling proving share 9 percent (board), 13 (hybrid), 20 (die)",
"income_a_chip_cannot_earn": "yes by rule (the proving share of every block, 20 percent ratified); LIVE ON DEVNET with on-chain paid records (663 paid v1 segment records to 30 prover keys on chain 4465, the PROVING LIVE lane's file bd3f53c1 on build-1), not yet in a shipped package",
"source": "build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/rows.md (the two-phase section), ADVERSARY commit 545f3f8a0; ctl-v6-coexistence.json"
}
},
{
"id": "rvn-kawpow",
"chain": "Ravencoin",
"algorithm": "KAWPOW (ProgPoW 0.9.4 with Ravencoin's kiss99 constants, 7,500-block epochs and a 512-parent DAG; live since block 1,219,736, 6 May 2020)",
"control": "ctl-progpow-094",
"pin": "ifdefelse/ProgPOW d035ae56536d2e6fc71aad609ac5085c9785d1b3, the reference's own CUDA kernel text, DAG generator and light cache (256 parents as the code implements); harness progpow-094/gpu/pp_harness_<block>, CPU reference cpu/pp094_ref; build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/progpow-094/ (SHA256SUMS)",
"dataset_bytes": 6182403712,
"dataset_note": "KAWPOW's current DAG size at Ravencoin height 4,573,707 (epoch 609, read 13:0x UK): the official ProgPoW 0.9.4 kernel built at Ethash block 18,270,000 (epoch 609, the same byte count), harness progpow-094/gpu/pp_harness_18270000; KAWPOW's own constants NOT applied, so the row is 'ProgPoW 0.9.4 official at KAWPOW's DAG size (proxy)'; 64 coalesced 256-byte reads per hash; F1 GPU = CPU on both nonces (cpu/vectors-094-kawpow-size-18270000.txt)",
"twin": "yes, by construction (progpow-094/gpu/pp_twin 18270000 26 250: the 64 dependent entry reads per 16-lane hash)",
"split": {"mining": 100, "proving": 0, "source": "Ravencoin's block reward goes to the miner in full (no second income to GPUs)"},
"public": {"block_reward": "1,250 RVN", "block_time": "60 s", "network_hash": "721.3 GH/s", "price_usd": "0.0022", "source": "minerstat.com/coin/RVN, read 9 October 2026 13:3x UK (public figures, not measured by the lab)"},
"own_claim": "the ProgPoW README (the pinned commit) states a specialised chip gains 1.1x to 1.2x on ProgPoW's premise (the chip keeps a GPU-class datapath). The figure 1.5x quoted in the ledger's brief as Ravencoin's own claim has no source in the pinned text or on the record: NOT FOUND; the row carries the README's 1.1x to 1.2x",
"cells": {
"4090": {"status": "MEASURED (prior row: kawpowminer, not the pinned kernel; a PROXY until the ledger session's pinned-kernel row lands)", "session": "comparative-lane a2ed5c31 (RunPod, one chain, an earlier session)", "nj": 6920, "mhs": 58.95, "w": 409, "f": null, "twin_nj": null, "spread_pct": null, "clock": "stock", "pod": "RunPod, the comparative lane a2ed5c31", "source": "build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/rows.md (the ctl-progpow-094 section, card rows)", "note": "407 to 411 W at 58.95 MH/s; the ledger session re-measures with the pinned official kernel at Raven's DAG size (CONTROLS' rate-only read on a 4090 at stock: 58.95 MH/s full, the twin 60.99), board power sampled, median of three, the twin beside it"},
"5090": {"status": "pending (COHORT, the ledger session)", "session": "pending", "nj": null, "mhs": null, "w": null, "f": null, "twin_nj": null, "spread_pct": null, "clock": "stock", "pod": "pending", "source": "pending", "note": ""}
},
"adversary": {
"status": "WITNESS (modelled on the kawpowminer census as the work proxy until CONTROLS' trace replaces it)",
"board": {"low": 1453, "nominal": 1757, "high": 2147, "design": "GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; bandwidth-bound at 16 KB per hash (93 MH/s per board)", "split_nj": "memory 647 / ALU and tax per rows.md"},
"die": {"nominal": 697, "design": "N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row (USD 1.89 per MH/s); the cheapest specialist of any kind is near-memory base dies at 669 nJ"},
"premise": {"4090": "1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; no measured twin on this kernel yet)", "5090": "1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured)"},
"source": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ledger-rows.md and ledger-rows.json (class-v6-adversary 47f16b86f); build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/ctl-progpow-094.json (set v3)"
},
"real_chip": null,
"phases": {
"status": "WITNESS, the chain's own units, the 100/0 split, the same 24-month life, design cost and fleet rule as v6, the three price paths (flat at the public price, x2 growing, x0.5 falling, the hash held); the public lines on the row",
"A": "before investment: no fleet from 100 to 100 M machines recovers a board chip's spend on any path, because Ravencoin's whole mining emission over 24 months (about USD 2.9 M at the public price) sits below one USD 35 M design cost; 10,000 boards would take 56 percent of the 721 GH/s network and earn USD 1.6 M to 2.4 M against a USD 44 M spend",
"B": "spend sunk, mining only: mining revenue USD 0.064 per TH of the chain's own hashes; the board chip's recurring cost USD 0.069 per TH at ten cents; the chip's operating advantage over the RTX 4090 at stock (6,920 nJ) USD 0.123 per TH (the GPU's electricity 0.192 less the chip's 0.069) stands in full, no prover income",
"income_a_chip_cannot_earn": "no (the block reward is mining only)",
"source": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ctl-progpow-094-coexistence.json (rows[].phase_a, rows[].phase_b_split; method lab/adv/README.md section 14), ADVERSARY commit d7db3e596 on class-v6-adversary"
}
},
{
"id": "firo-firopow",
"chain": "Firo",
"algorithm": "FiroPoW (ProgPoW 0.9.4 with Firo's constants; live since block 419,264, 26 October 2021)",
"control": "ctl-progpow-094 (the same row as KAWPOW)",
"pin": "as KAWPOW: the pinned ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference; FiroPoW differs from KAWPOW only in its constants and DAG schedule, so the lab serves ONE row for both and says so",
"dataset_bytes": null,
"dataset_note": "= KAWPOW's row (its own DAG schedule is not measured separately)",
"twin": "as KAWPOW",
"split": {"mining": 100, "proving": 0, "source": "Firo's block reward splits between miners, masternodes and the development fund; the GPU's share is mining only (no proving income)"},
"own_claim": "as ProgPoW's: 1.1x to 1.2x on its premise",
"same_row_as": "rvn-kawpow",
"cells": {},
"adversary": {"status": "= KAWPOW's row", "board": null, "die": null, "premise": {}, "source": "as KAWPOW"},
"real_chip": null,
"phases": {"status": "= KAWPOW's row at a 100/0 split", "A": "as KAWPOW", "B": "as KAWPOW", "income_a_chip_cannot_earn": "no", "source": "as KAWPOW"}
},
{
"id": "ironfish-fishhash",
"chain": "Iron Fish",
"algorithm": "FishHash (live since hardfork 1, April 2024)",
"control": "ctl-fishhash",
"pin": "iron-fish/fish-hash 823531c002e78259759f8b1f36ac9121c32059b1 (cpp/FishHash.cpp; the spec FishHash.pdf sha256 869870b9...); the lab's CUDA implementation bit-exact with the library on 64 items and 256 hashes, fingerprint f841605125ce375e; gpu/fh_cuda, cpu/fh_cli; build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/fishhash/ (SHA256SUMS)",
"dataset_bytes": 4831835776,
"dataset_note": "37,748,717 items of 128 bytes, FIXED (no epochs); 96 random 128-byte reads per hash, 9,856 lane-instructions",
"twin": "yes (a trace replay of the kernel's own item indexes; its energy read as a bound: the twin runs 10 percent slower than the full kernel)",
"split": {"mining": 100, "proving": 0, "source": "Iron Fish's block reward is mining only"},
"public": {"block_reward": "17.25 IRON", "block_time": "61 s", "network_hash": "229.5 GH/s", "price_usd": "0.07", "source": "minerstat.com/coin/IRON, read 9 October 2026 13:3x UK (public figures, not measured by the lab)"},
"own_claim": "none as a chip-edge number; the Trail of Bits review (Iron Fish blog, 14 May 2024) is the published outside check",
"cells": {
"4090": {"status": "pending (COHORT, the ledger session); CONTROLS' rate-only read 19.73 MH/s at stock, no sampler", "nj": null, "mhs": 19.73, "w": null, "f": null, "twin_nj": null, "spread_pct": null, "clock": "stock", "pod": "CONTROLS' rented 4090 (rate only)", "source": "build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/fishhash/gpu/bench-4090.log", "note": "242 GB/s of 128-byte lines at that rate"},
"5090": {"status": "pending (COHORT, the ledger session); CONTROLS' rate-only sm_120 read 45.37 MH/s full, 39.71 twin, F1 PASS", "nj": null, "mhs": 45.37, "w": null, "f": null, "twin_nj": null, "spread_pct": null, "clock": "stock", "pod": "CONTROLS' rented 5090 (rate only)", "source": "build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/fishhash/ (fishhash.md)", "note": ""}
},
"adversary": {
"status": "WITNESS (modelled; the card's cell pending, so the ratio is pending)",
"board": {"low": 881, "nominal": 1051, "high": 1257, "design": "GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; bandwidth-bound at 124 MH/s per board; 95 percent of the board's energy is the memory path", "split_nj": "memory 529 / ALU 46 / tax 503"},
"die": {"nominal": 170, "design": "full SRAM dies (three N2 reticles) + sized + fused operations"},
"premise": {"4090": "pending (needs the measured f from the twin)", "5090": "pending"},
"source": "build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/ctl-fishhash.json and rows.md (set v3)"
},
"real_chip": null,
"phases": {"status": "WITNESS, the chain's own units, the 100/0 split, the same life, design cost, fleet rule and price paths as v6; the GPU side of phase B NOT RUN until COHORT's card rows", "A": "before investment: no fleet from 100 to 100 M machines recovers a board chip's spend on any path; Iron Fish's whole mining emission over 24 months is about USD 1.4 M at the public price (10,000 boards would take 84 percent of the hash for USD 1.1 M to 1.6 M)", "B": "spend sunk, mining only: mining revenue USD 0.086 per TH of the chain's own hashes; the board chip's recurring cost USD 0.043 per TH at ten cents; the GPU side NOT RUN until the card cell lands; no prover income by construction", "income_a_chip_cannot_earn": "no", "source": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ctl-fishhash-coexistence.json, ADVERSARY commit d7db3e596 on class-v6-adversary"}
},
{
"id": "etc-etchash",
"chain": "Ethereum Classic",
"algorithm": "Etchash (Ethash with ECIP-1099's 60,000-block epochs; live since block 11,700,000, November 2020)",
"control": "ctl-etchash (new for the ledger)",
"pin": "a CUDA hashimoto over the pinned chfast/ethash v0.8.0 library's light cache and the ProgPOW repo's reference DAG generator (libethash objects), checked against ethash::hash on the CPU at block 0 and at the live epoch (F1: GPU = CPU on both nonces); gpu/etchash_cuda (`check <block> <nonces>`, `bench <block> 22 250`, `bench <block> 22 250 twin`), cpu/etc_ref; build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/etchash/ (SHA256SUMS; etchash.md)",
"dataset_bytes": 4638898816,
"dataset_note": "ETC height 25,502,946 (read 12:5x UK) = Etchash epoch 425 (ECIP-1099: height / 60,000), the harness's block argument 12,750,000 (the Ethash epoch with the same size table index); 64 coalesced 128-byte reads per hash (two 64-byte half-mixes); CONTROLS' rate-only read on a 4090 at stock 29.90 MH/s full and 29.90 twin (memory-bound)",
"twin": "yes, by construction",
"split": {"mining": 100, "proving": 0, "source": "ETC's block reward is mining only"},
"public": {"block_reward": "2.048 ETC", "block_time": "16 s", "network_hash": "120.9 TH/s", "price_usd": "8.24", "source": "minerstat.com/coin/ETC, read 9 October 2026 13:3x UK (public figures, not measured by the lab)"},
"own_claim": "none; the chain accepts chips (the Antminer E9 Pro mines it)",
"cells": {
"4090": {"status": "pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the harness staged 13:0x UK); CONTROLS' rate-only read 29.90 MH/s", "nj": null, "mhs": 29.90, "w": null, "f": null, "twin_nj": null, "spread_pct": null, "clock": "stock", "pod": "CONTROLS' rented 4090 (rate only)", "source": "build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/etchash/ (etchash.md)", "note": ""},
"5090": {"status": "pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the sm_120 build from etchash/src)", "nj": null, "mhs": null, "w": null, "f": null, "twin_nj": null, "spread_pct": null, "clock": "stock", "pod": "pending", "source": "pending", "note": ""}
},
"adversary": {
"status": "WITNESS (modelled; the card cells pending, so the ratios are pending)",
"board": {"low": 638, "nominal": 765, "high": 919, "design": "GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; USD 3.25 per MH/s", "split_nj": "per ledger-rows.md"},
"die": {"nominal": 177, "design": "N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row"},
"premise": {"4090": "1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured)", "5090": "1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure)"},
"source": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ledger-rows.md and ledger-rows.json (class-v6-adversary 47f16b86f, wording 82330b04c)",
"calibration": "the modelled same-node DRAM board 765 nJ per hash against the Antminer E9 Pro's 598 from its public figures: the model reads 1.28x PESSIMISTIC for the chip (it gives the chip more energy than the one real chip spends); a witness, never a ceiling"
},
"real_chip": {
"name": "Bitmain Antminer E9 Pro",
"mhs": 3680,
"w": 2200,
"nj": 597.8,
"status": "WITNESS (a manufacturer's published figure, not measured by the lab)",
"source": "Bitmain's stated figures as listed on minerstat's hardware page (https://minerstat.com/hardware/antminer-e9-pro): 3.68 GH/s on Ethash at 2,200 W, release 2023-02; 2,200 W / 3,680 MH/s = 0.598 J per MH = 598 nJ per hash",
"note": "the ONE live GPU-mined chain with a chip on the market; the modelled board (765 nJ) sits beside it: 1.28x pessimistic for the chip"
},
"phases": {"status": "WITNESS, the chain's own units, the 100/0 split, the same life, design cost, fleet rule and price paths as v6; the GPU side of phase B NOT RUN until COHORT's card rows", "A": "before investment: no fleet from 100 to 100 M machines recovers a board chip's spend on any path; ETC's whole mining emission over 24 months is about USD 83 M at the public price, but 10,000 boards are 2 percent of 120.9 TH/s and earn USD 1.0 M to 1.5 M, and 100,000 boards (13 percent) USD 9 M to 13 M against a USD 150 M spend", "B": "spend sunk, mining only: mining revenue USD 0.0087 per TH of the chain's own hashes, below even the modelled board's recurring cost (USD 0.031 per TH) and below the E9 Pro's own electricity at ten cents (598 nJ = USD 0.017 per TH): at the public figures nobody mines ETC at a profit at ten cents and phase B is a loss on both sides; the GPU side NOT RUN until the card cell lands", "income_a_chip_cannot_earn": "no", "source": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ctl-etchash-coexistence.json, ADVERSARY commit d7db3e596 on class-v6-adversary"}
},
{
"id": "ergo-autolykos2",
"chain": "Ergo",
"algorithm": "Autolykos2 (k = 32, n = 26, Blake2b-256; the table grows 5 percent every 51,200 blocks)",
"control": "ctl-autolykos (new for the ledger, landed 13:1x UK)",
"pin": "the published text ergoplatform/ergo master 3a6b00d3, AutolykosPowScheme.scala (sha256 330ae870...; the copy in src/), implemented in-house: CPU reference src/autolykos_ref.py (hashlib's Blake2b, lazy elements), GPU gpu/autolykos_cuda (`check <height> <N> <count> < fixtures`, `bench <height> <N> 20 250`, `bench ... twin`; sm_89, the sm_120 build from src); F1 at N = 65,536 and at the live table: elements 0 and last, 64 hits and the 256-hit fingerprints equal the reference's (f3cf1fd34d1002fa small, b6d07a7b15956179 live); build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/autolykos/ (SHA256SUMS; autolykos.md). CAVEAT on the row: the fixtures are the lab's own from an independent implementation of the published text (the reference repository has no known-answer v2 hit vector); the end-to-end check against a live Ergo block is owed, not claimed",
"dataset_bytes": 7272058080,
"dataset_note": "the live table at Ergo height 1,890,820 (api.ergoplatform.com, 13:0x UK): N = 227,251,815 elements of 32 bytes (+5 percent at height 1,894,400; the row names its height); 33 random 32-byte reads per hash; the table builds on the device in 1.5 s; CONTROLS' rate-only read on a 4090 at stock 216.2 MH/s full, 201.8 twin",
"twin": "yes (a trace replay)",
"split": {"mining": 100, "proving": 0, "source": "Ergo's block reward is mining only"},
"public": {"block_reward": "3.009 ERG", "block_time": "120 s", "network_hash": "569.1 GH/s", "price_usd": "0.29", "source": "minerstat.com/coin/ERG, read 9 October 2026 13:4x UK (public figures, not measured by the lab)"},
"own_claim": "none on the record as a chip-edge number",
"cells": {
"4090": {"status": "pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the harness staged 13:1x UK); CONTROLS' rate-only read 216.2 MH/s full, 201.8 twin", "session": "pending", "nj": null, "mhs": 216.2, "w": null, "f": null, "twin_nj": null, "spread_pct": null, "clock": "stock", "pod": "CONTROLS' rented 4090 (rate only)", "source": "build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/autolykos/ (autolykos.md)", "note": ""},
"5090": {"status": "pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the sm_120 build from src)", "session": "pending", "nj": null, "mhs": null, "w": null, "f": null, "twin_nj": null, "spread_pct": null, "clock": "stock", "pod": "pending", "source": "pending", "note": ""}
},
"adversary": {"status": "pending (ADVERSARY: the chip rows from CONTROLS' trace; default 15:00 UK, else pending (adversary))", "board": null, "die": null, "premise": {"4090": "pending", "5090": "pending"}, "source": "pending"},
"real_chip": null,
"phases": {"status": "pending (ADVERSARY at the 100/0 split, the public line on the row)", "A": "pending (ADVERSARY)", "B": "pending (ADVERSARY); no prover income by construction", "income_a_chip_cannot_earn": "no", "source": "pending"}
}
],
"claim": {
"ordered_sentence": "the lowest measured chip-to-GPU edge of any live GPU network under a published method, on both conventions, and the only one whose GPUs earn income a chip cannot",
"headline_rule": "the headline reads only what the like-for-like rows support, clause by clause (main's ruling, 13:2x UK 9 October 2026); under the ledger's own convention the measured edge per chain on the same card and state is stated as numbers, with no ranking word until the rows say so after the ledger session",
"clauses": [
{"text": "under ProgPoW's own convention, the lowest measured chip-to-GPU edge of the chains on this ledger", "convention": "ProgPoW's premise (a chip that keeps a GPU-class datapath)", "state": "SUPPORTED on the current rows", "why": "Igneum v6 1.01x to 1.03x (its measured f 0.81 to 0.85) against ProgPoW's own 1.10x to 1.20x for KAWPOW and FiroPoW; FishHash and Etchash pending their twins"},
{"text": "under the ledger's convention (the cheapest credible programmable specialist, adversarial set v3), each chain's measured edge on the same card and state, as numbers", "convention": "ours", "state": "NUMBERS ONLY; no ranking until the ledger session (COHORT, both cards, every chain back to back, the pinned 0.9.4 kernel, twins; 14:45 UK)", "why": "the current cells come from different sessions (the lab's cohort pods for v6, the comparative lane's pod for KAWPOW) and a cross-chain comparison is made only between cells from the same card, state and session; at the RTX 4090 at stock the cells read v6 5.4x (5.67x on the second pod) and KAWPOW 3.9x (a proxy row from an earlier session); FishHash and Etchash pending"},
{"text": "and the only chain on this ledger whose GPUs are paid, by rule, an income a hash chip cannot earn", "convention": "phase B, each chain's actual reward split", "state": "LABELLED BY THE PROVING LIVE LANE", "why": "the proving share (20 percent ratified) is paid to GPUs for work a hash chip cannot do; every other chain on the ledger pays mining only; the live state of that income is the PROVING LIVE lane's evidence line"}
],
"withdrawn": "the earlier line 'KAWPOW and FiroPoW read 5 to 6x on the measured 4090 rows and v6 reads 2.35x' is withdrawn: it compared v6 at the 5090's 1,300 MHz knee with KAWPOW at the 4090 at stock, two cards and two states; the like-for-like cells are the ones on this ledger",
"proving_live_label": "LIVE ON DEVNET, on-chain records (the PROVING LIVE lane, read 11:50:22Z 9 October 2026): on chain id 4465 (the Igneum 2.0 devnet) 663 paid v1 segment records (8 shards plus aggregation each) = 653.93 IGN paid from the proving pool to 30 distinct prover keys across chain blocks 3,000 to 30,687 (tip 31,719 at the read), plus 6,474 paid v0 shard records = 7,196 IGN; read by igneum_getProvingStatus, igneum_getSegmentRecords (3,965 segments) and igneum_getSegment; evidence build-1:/srv/artefacts/proving-live/prov-ledger-4465-tip31719-115022Z.json sha256 bd3f53c18c3ffa20354ea62ade9fd5e7a5794202a71c3c369a5be71484f7143a. NOT YET LIVE IN A SHIPPED PACKAGE: the payees are the fleet's prover stack (the same binaries the 2.0.3.1 HiveOS package wraps, cut 18:00 UK); the apps' prover is on by default on 24 GB cards but no app-proved record is on the record yet; a full-epoch line follows by 16:00 UK"
}
}

44
docs/design/proving-claim-order.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
# Proving claim order (9 October 2026)
How segments are allocated among provers today, what it wastes, and the rule change proposed for the node after 2.0.3. Nothing in this document changes the chain today. Approved as a design item by main at 13:2x UK on 9 October 2026, after the PROVING LIVE lane's on-chain read.
## The rule today, by file and line (node 27f54124, release-2.0.3 line)
| step | rule | where |
|---|---|---|
| assignment | 8 assignees per shard, drawn deterministically from the distinct prover keys seen in the record window (`assign(epoch_seed, block, shard, window)`) | consensus/core/src/proving.rs:26, :255 |
| exclusive window | inside the first 10 DAA after a segment only an assignee's record is paid; after that every key may prove it | consensus/core/src/proving.rs:30, :305 |
| payment | the first valid record carried in a block is paid; every later record for the same segment is refused "segment already paid" | igneum/exec/src/proving.rs:551 to :572 (`carried_payouts`), `segment_status` Proven |
| pool share | 20 percent of every block subsidy, split over the segment's shards with 1,000 bps to the aggregator | consensus/core/src/igneum.rs:44, :87; consensus/core/src/proving.rs:638 (`split_pool_credit`) |
| leases | V6-08 leases (300 DAA, three abandons an hour, 120 DAA penalty) exist in the node but are node-local and OFF on the live nodes (`igneum_getProvingStatus` reports `leases: null`; `IGNEUM_PROVING_LEASES` unset) | igneum/exec/src/proving.rs:110, :129 |
| the prover's pick | every whole, open, unpaid segment of the last 600 chain blocks whose deadline (last DAA + 600) is at least 240 DAA ahead, ranked by FNV-1a(first, key): a per-key random order | tools/fleet/box-prover.py `candidates()` |
No stake, no queue, no price. A new key is not an assignee until its first record is carried (10 seconds of exclusivity it cannot use, nothing more); from then on it competes at first-valid-record-wins with the same random order as every other key.
## What it costs, measured on Devnet 4 (chain id 4465)
Read on 9 October 2026 at 11:50:22Z from lp-4090-02's node (`igneum_getSegmentRecords` for every one of 3,965 v1 segments from genesis to chain block 31,719; the file is build-1:/srv/artefacts/proving-live/prov-ledger-4465-tip31719-115022Z.json, sha256 bd3f53c18c3ffa20354ea62ade9fd5e7a5794202a71c3c369a5be71484f7143a).
| carried segment records | count | share |
|---|---|---|
| paid (first valid record) | 663 | 30 percent |
| refused "segment already paid" (a duplicate proof of a paid segment) | 952 | 43 percent |
| refused "unproven" (carried after the segment's deadline) | 461 | 21 percent |
| refused "block ... is not chain block N on this chain" (proved on a fork) | 77 | 4 percent |
| refused on the chain link ("segment ... does not chain to ...") | 46 | 2 percent |
| total carried | 2,199 | |
In the morning's run alone (chain blocks 28,000 to 30,999, about 06:00 to 11:00Z, 30 to 40 provers on one chain): 148 segments paid, 369 duplicate records refused, 109 late records refused. Two and a half duplicate proofs for every paid one: with 30 to 40 provers over about 22 claimable segments at a time (the margin window is 360 DAA wide at 2 DAA per chain block and 8 blocks per segment), the per-key random order collides by chance, and every collision is a 120-second GPU proof thrown away.
Capacity: 3,600 DAA an epoch = about 1,817 chain blocks = about 227 segments an hour at 0.505 chain blocks per DAA; one 4090 proves a segment in 120 to 185 seconds beside its miner, so the work saturates at 8 to 11 provers and every prover past that dilutes the fixed 20 percent as 1/N. The 663 paid segments went to 30 keys with a median of 4 and a maximum of 230 per key; the skew is uptime (which boxes were on the chain when), not the rule.
## The proposal (node change after 2.0.3; nothing on the chain today)
Two consensus-free changes, both node-local, both deterministic from data every node already holds:
1. Template side (the producer): when a template is built and the pool holds more than one verified record for a segment, carry the record of the key whose FNV-1a(first, key) is smallest, not the first received. A duplicate still costs the prover its proof, but the pick no longer depends on network arrival order, so a prover that ranks itself can predict whether its proof will be the one carried.
2. Prover side (box-prover.py and the app's prover): claim a segment only when the key's rank by FNV-1a(first, key) among the keys in the record window is below ceil(K / M), with K the number of keys in the window and M the number of claimable segments in the margin; otherwise take the next segment in its own order. With the template rule above this makes the carried record and the claimed record the same one in expectation, and the duplicate rate falls to the rate of keys that join or leave inside one margin window.
Default: the prover side ships first (a script change, no node release); the template side rides the first node cut after 2.0.3 with a fast-time case (two provers, one segment, the lower rank carried). Measured target: duplicates under 10 percent of carried records over an epoch, read the same way as the table above.
What this is not: not a lease (leases are node-local and cannot order claims across boxes), not a stake, not a queue a newcomer waits in. A new key's rank is as random as any other's from its first record.

136
docs/ledger/gpu-ledger.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
# The GPU network ledger
Every live GPU-mined chain we could pin, measured the same way on the same rented cards in the same sessions, with the same
chip-design method applied to each, and ranked. Igneum sits in the table as one row among the others, under the same rules. Every
number is measured or a labelled model with its source; a number that does not exist yet says "pending" and names who owes it; a
chain we could not run in-house says NOT RUN and why. The full record with the lane bookkeeping is in the repository at
docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/ledger/ (README.md and ledger.json); this page is rendered from the same data file.
<!-- ledger:stamp:start -->
Data: ledger.json, stamp 2026-10-09, adversarial set v3 (build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/ (README.md, design-notes/adversarial-sets-v1-v2-v3.md, rows/, SHA256SUMS); set v3 commit b2b9ee0b9 on class-v6-adversary).
<!-- ledger:stamp:end -->
## The method, the same for every chain
1. **The object.** Each chain's proof of work as its own pinned reference code, built from source (no downloaded miner binaries):
Igneum's frozen class v6 at its live 4 GiB dataset; the official ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference kernel for Ravencoin's KAWPOW (which is
ProgPoW 0.9.4 with Ravencoin's constants, so the row is a labelled proxy) and the same row for Firo's FiroPoW; Iron Fish's
FishHash reference library with a bit-exact CUDA port; the pinned chfast/ethash library's hashimoto at Ethereum Classic's
current epoch; Ergo's Autolykos2 NOT RUN (the reason on the row).
2. **The card rows.** One rented RTX 4090 and one rented RTX 5090 on uncapped hosts, every chain back to back in one session per
card at stock clocks; board power sampled at 1 Hz (idle not subtracted); nJ per hash = watts over MH/s; three runs, the median
with its spread; the dataset size and the card's clock on every row; a read-only twin (the same memory reads, the arithmetic
cut) where the harness has one, giving the card's memory share f.
3. **The chip rows.** For each chain, the cheapest credible specialist chip on the same process node as the card, as a complete
machine, modelled and labelled as a model (never measured): the DRAM-board chip is the energy row, the full-SRAM die the
residual. Two conventions beside every ratio: ours (the cheapest programmable core, fused where the work allows) and ProgPoW's
own premise (the chip must keep a GPU-class datapath, so its edge is 1.1x to 1.2x on the compute term, weighted by f).
4. **The real chip.** Ethereum Classic is the one chain here with a chip on the market, the Antminer E9 Pro; its published rate
and power sit on the row, and our modelled chip for Etchash sits beside it as the calibration of the model.
5. **The two phases.** Before investment: can a chip maker recover its spend under growing, flat and falling prices. After, with
the spend sunk: who exits first on operating cost, with each chain's actual reward split. On Igneum a GPU earns the mining share
plus the proving share (80 / 20); a hash chip earns the mining share only. On every other chain here the GPU earns mining only,
so the second-income term is zero by construction.
6. **The ranking.** (a) ascending on the DRAM-board ratio under our convention at the worse of the two cards (the lower ratio is
the smaller chip edge); (b) the same under ProgPoW's premise; (c) whether the chain's GPUs earn an income a hash chip cannot. A
chain with a pending or proxy cell is ranked provisionally and says so; a NOT RUN chain is unranked.
## The card rows (measured, board power, stock)
<!-- ledger:cards:start -->
| chain | algorithm | dataset on the row | reward split (mining / proving) | RTX 4090 stock: nJ per hash (MH/s, W, f) | RTX 5090 stock: nJ per hash (MH/s, W, f) | twin | sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igneum | class v6, the live signing object 0x2a1d6caab4c24564 (2.0 devnet, chain id 4465) | 4.29 GB (4,294,967,296 bytes); 2^30 words, the live policy (70a6c703); 256 random 4-byte reads per hash, 62,120 instructions per hash (instruction convention) | 80 / 20 (the Token Value volume on master (D04, token-value/README.md: the 80/20 emission allocation); PROVING_POOL_SHARE_PERCENT) | 8,369 MEASURED (30.67 MH/s, 256.7 W, f 0.848; spread 0.67%; vast 55009211, driver 580; stock (the pod refused -lgc); clocks_sm_median pending the ledger session) | 5,597 MEASURED (68.66 MH/s, 384.3 W, f 0.811; spread 2.11%; vast 55006481, driver 580; stock (the pod refused -lgc); the host cap 500 W, the card drew 384) | yes (the same address stream, the arithmetic cut) | RTX 4090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/ctl-v6/vast-55009211/ (rows.jsonl, SHA256SUMS); the cohort table build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/cohort/TABLE.md; RTX 5090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/ctl-v6/vast-55006481/; the cohort table build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/cohort/TABLE.md |
| Ravencoin | KAWPOW (ProgPoW 0.9.4 with Ravencoin's kiss99 constants, 7,500-block epochs and a 512-parent DAG; live since block 1,219,736, 6 May 2020) | 6.18 GB (6,182,403,712 bytes); KAWPOW's current DAG size at Ravencoin height 4,573,707 (epoch 609, read 13:0x UK): the official ProgPoW 0.9.4 kernel built at Ethash block 18,270,000 (epoch 609, the same byte count), harness progpow-094/gpu/pp_harness_18270000; KAWPOW's own constants NOT applied, so the row is 'ProgPoW 0.9.4 official at KAWPOW's DAG size (proxy)'; 64 coalesced 256-byte reads per hash; F1 GPU = CPU on both nonces (cpu/vectors-094-kawpow-size-18270000.txt) | 100 / 0 (Ravencoin's block reward goes to the miner in full (no second income to GPUs)) | 6,920 MEASURED (prior row: kawpowminer, not the pinned kernel; a PROXY until the ledger session's pinned-kernel row lands) (58.95 MH/s, 409.0 W, f none; spread none; RunPod, the comparative lane a2ed5c31; stock) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session) | yes, by construction (progpow-094/gpu/pp_twin 18270000 26 250: the 64 dependent entry reads per 16-lane hash) | RTX 4090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/rows.md (the ctl-progpow-094 section, card rows) |
| Firo | FiroPoW (ProgPoW 0.9.4 with Firo's constants; live since block 419,264, 26 October 2021) | = Ravencoin's row | 100 / 0 | = Ravencoin's row | = Ravencoin's row | as Ravencoin | as KAWPOW: the pinned ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference; FiroPoW differs from KAWPOW only in its constants and DAG schedule, so the lab serves ONE row for both and says so |
| Iron Fish | FishHash (live since hardfork 1, April 2024) | 4.83 GB (4,831,835,776 bytes); 37,748,717 items of 128 bytes, FIXED (no epochs); 96 random 128-byte reads per hash, 9,856 lane-instructions | 100 / 0 (Iron Fish's block reward is mining only) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session); CONTROLS' rate-only read 19.73 MH/s at stock, no sampler (rate only 19.73 MH/s) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session); CONTROLS' rate-only sm_120 read 45.37 MH/s full, 39.71 twin, F1 PASS (rate only 45.37 MH/s) | yes (a trace replay of the kernel's own item indexes; its energy read as a bound: the twin runs 10 percent slower than the full kernel) | RTX 4090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/fishhash/gpu/bench-4090.log; RTX 5090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/fishhash/ (fishhash.md) |
| Ethereum Classic | Etchash (Ethash with ECIP-1099's 60,000-block epochs; live since block 11,700,000, November 2020) | 4.64 GB (4,638,898,816 bytes); ETC height 25,502,946 (read 12:5x UK) = Etchash epoch 425 (ECIP-1099: height / 60,000), the harness's block argument 12,750,000 (the Ethash epoch with the same size table index); 64 coalesced 128-byte reads per hash (two 64-byte half-mixes); CONTROLS' rate-only read on a 4090 at stock 29.90 MH/s full and 29.90 twin (memory-bound) | 100 / 0 (ETC's block reward is mining only) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the harness staged 13:0x UK); CONTROLS' rate-only read 29.90 MH/s (rate only 29.90 MH/s) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the sm_120 build from etchash/src) | yes, by construction | RTX 4090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/etchash/ (etchash.md) |
| Ergo | Autolykos2 (k = 32, n = 26, Blake2b-256; the table grows 5 percent every 51,200 blocks) | 7.27 GB (7,272,058,080 bytes); the live table at Ergo height 1,890,820 (api.ergoplatform.com, 13:0x UK): N = 227,251,815 elements of 32 bytes (+5 percent at height 1,894,400; the row names its height); 33 random 32-byte reads per hash; the table builds on the device in 1.5 s; CONTROLS' rate-only read on a 4090 at stock 216.2 MH/s full, 201.8 twin | 100 / 0 (Ergo's block reward is mining only) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the harness staged 13:1x UK); CONTROLS' rate-only read 216.2 MH/s full, 201.8 twin (rate only 216.20 MH/s) | pending: pending (COHORT, the ledger session; the sm_120 build from src) | yes (a trace replay) | RTX 4090: build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/autolykos/ (autolykos.md) |
<!-- ledger:cards:end -->
## The chip-to-GPU edge, both conventions
<!-- ledger:edge:start -->
| chain | the cheapest credible same-node DRAM board (set v3, nJ per hash, band) | ratio at the RTX 4090 stock (ours) | ratio at the RTX 5090 stock (ours) | ProgPoW-premise ratio at the RTX 4090 | ProgPoW-premise ratio at the RTX 5090 | the die as the residual (nJ; ratio at the worse card) | real chip on the market | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igneum | 1,542 (1,329 to 1,941); GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; split memory 527 / ALU 166 / tax 849; WITNESS (modelled, complete machine, instruction convention) | 5.43x (4.31 to 6.30) | 3.63x (2.88 to 4.21) | 1.01x to 1.03x (f 0.853 measured) | 1.02x to 1.03x (f 0.811 measured on the stock pod) | 335 (N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row); 25.0x | none on the market | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ledger-rows.md and ledger-rows.json (class-v6-adversary 47f16b86f); build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/ctl-v6.json and rows.md (set v3, 2026-10-09T11:33Z); the die 12.0x at the 5090 knee, USD 0.77 per MH/s |
| Ravencoin | 1,757 (1,453 to 2,147); GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; bandwidth-bound at 16 KB per hash (93 MH/s per board); split memory 647 / ALU and tax per rows.md; WITNESS (modelled on the kawpowminer census as the work proxy until CONTROLS' trace replaces it) | 3.94x (3.22 to 4.76) | pending | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; no measured twin on this kernel yet) | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured) | 697 (N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row (USD 1.89 per MH/s); the cheapest specialist of any kind is near-memory base dies at 669 nJ); 9.9x | none on the market | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ledger-rows.md and ledger-rows.json (class-v6-adversary 47f16b86f); build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/ctl-progpow-094.json (set v3) |
| Firo (= Ravencoin's row) | 1,757 (1,453 to 2,147); GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; bandwidth-bound at 16 KB per hash (93 MH/s per board); split memory 647 / ALU and tax per rows.md; WITNESS (modelled on the kawpowminer census as the work proxy until CONTROLS' trace replaces it) | 3.94x (3.22 to 4.76) | pending | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; no measured twin on this kernel yet) | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured) | 697 (N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row (USD 1.89 per MH/s); the cheapest specialist of any kind is near-memory base dies at 669 nJ); 9.9x | none on the market | = Ravencoin's row |
| Iron Fish | 1,051 (881 to 1,257); GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; bandwidth-bound at 124 MH/s per board; 95 percent of the board's energy is the memory path; split memory 529 / ALU 46 / tax 503; WITNESS (modelled; the card's cell pending, so the ratio is pending) | pending | pending | pending (needs the measured f from the twin) | pending | 170 (full SRAM dies (three N2 reticles) + sized + fused operations); pending | none on the market | build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/ctl-fishhash.json and rows.md (set v3) |
| Ethereum Classic | 765 (638 to 919); GDDR7 board + register file sized to the work + fused operations, N5; USD 3.25 per MH/s; split per ledger-rows.md; WITNESS (modelled; the card cells pending, so the ratios are pending) | pending | pending | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured) | 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure) | 177 (N2 full-SRAM die, the coexistence row); pending | Bitmain Antminer E9 Pro: 3,680 MH/s at 2,200 W = 598 nJ per hash, WITNESS (a manufacturer's published figure, not measured by the lab); Bitmain's stated figures as listed on minerstat's hardware page (https://minerstat.com/hardware/antminer-e9-pro): 3.68 GH/s on Ethash at 2,200 W, release 2023-02; 2,200 W / 3,680 MH/s = 0.598 J per MH = 598 nJ per hash | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ledger-rows.md and ledger-rows.json (class-v6-adversary 47f16b86f, wording 82330b04c) |
| Ergo | pending: pending (ADVERSARY: the chip rows from CONTROLS' trace; default 15:00 UK, else pending (adversary)) | pending | pending | pending | pending | pending | none on the market | pending |
<!-- ledger:edge:end -->
## The two phases with each chain's actual split
<!-- ledger:phases:start -->
| chain | split | phase A (before investment) | phase B (spend sunk) | an income a hash chip cannot earn | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igneum | 80 / 20 | before investment (24 months, the mining share 80 percent of the year-1 subsidy): the same-node board maker recovers its spend on NO fleet from 100 to 100 M boards on the growing or flat price path (100,000 boards: net USD -55.4 M on 58.8 M revenue growing; -37.6 M on 76.6 M flat); only the falling path pays it; the N2 die recovers on no path | spend sunk, flat path at USD 0.10 per kWh, the chip at 10 percent of the hash: mining revenue USD 0.354 per TH; the GPU's proving income at the ratified 20 percent share USD 0.098 per TH against the board chip's operating advantage USD 0.046 per TH (GPU electricity 0.111 less the chip's electricity, hosting and maintenance 0.066): the GPU out-earns the built board chip; the cancelling proving share 9 percent (board), 13 (hybrid), 20 (die) | yes by rule (the proving share of every block, 20 percent ratified); LIVE ON DEVNET with on-chain paid records (663 paid v1 segment records to 30 prover keys on chain 4465, the PROVING LIVE lane's file bd3f53c1 on build-1), not yet in a shipped package | build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/adv/rows/rows.md (the two-phase section), ADVERSARY commit 545f3f8a0; ctl-v6-coexistence.json; WITNESS; phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package runs a prover |
| Ravencoin | 100 / 0 | before investment: no fleet from 100 to 100 M machines recovers a board chip's spend on any path, because Ravencoin's whole mining emission over 24 months (about USD 2.9 M at the public price) sits below one USD 35 M design cost; 10,000 boards would take 56 percent of the 721 GH/s network and earn USD 1.6 M to 2.4 M against a USD 44 M spend | spend sunk, mining only: mining revenue USD 0.064 per TH of the chain's own hashes; the board chip's recurring cost USD 0.069 per TH at ten cents; the chip's operating advantage over the RTX 4090 at stock (6,920 nJ) USD 0.123 per TH (the GPU's electricity 0.192 less the chip's 0.069) stands in full, no prover income | no (the block reward is mining only) | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ctl-progpow-094-coexistence.json (rows[].phase_a, rows[].phase_b_split; method lab/adv/README.md section 14), ADVERSARY commit d7db3e596 on class-v6-adversary; WITNESS, the chain's own units, the 100/0 split, the same 24-month life, design cost and fleet rule as v6, the three price paths (flat at the public price, x2 growing, x0.5 falling, the hash held); the public lines on the row |
| Firo | 100 / 0 | as KAWPOW | as KAWPOW | no | as KAWPOW; = KAWPOW's row at a 100/0 split |
| Iron Fish | 100 / 0 | before investment: no fleet from 100 to 100 M machines recovers a board chip's spend on any path; Iron Fish's whole mining emission over 24 months is about USD 1.4 M at the public price (10,000 boards would take 84 percent of the hash for USD 1.1 M to 1.6 M) | spend sunk, mining only: mining revenue USD 0.086 per TH of the chain's own hashes; the board chip's recurring cost USD 0.043 per TH at ten cents; the GPU side NOT RUN until the card cell lands; no prover income by construction | no | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ctl-fishhash-coexistence.json, ADVERSARY commit d7db3e596 on class-v6-adversary; WITNESS, the chain's own units, the 100/0 split, the same life, design cost, fleet rule and price paths as v6; the GPU side of phase B NOT RUN until COHORT's card rows |
| Ethereum Classic | 100 / 0 | before investment: no fleet from 100 to 100 M machines recovers a board chip's spend on any path; ETC's whole mining emission over 24 months is about USD 83 M at the public price, but 10,000 boards are 2 percent of 120.9 TH/s and earn USD 1.0 M to 1.5 M, and 100,000 boards (13 percent) USD 9 M to 13 M against a USD 150 M spend | spend sunk, mining only: mining revenue USD 0.0087 per TH of the chain's own hashes, below even the modelled board's recurring cost (USD 0.031 per TH) and below the E9 Pro's own electricity at ten cents (598 nJ = USD 0.017 per TH): at the public figures nobody mines ETC at a profit at ten cents and phase B is a loss on both sides; the GPU side NOT RUN until the card cell lands | no | docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/v3/ctl-etchash-coexistence.json, ADVERSARY commit d7db3e596 on class-v6-adversary; WITNESS, the chain's own units, the 100/0 split, the same life, design cost, fleet rule and price paths as v6; the GPU side of phase B NOT RUN until COHORT's card rows |
| Ergo | 100 / 0 | pending (ADVERSARY) | pending (ADVERSARY); no prover income by construction | no | pending; pending (ADVERSARY at the 100/0 split, the public line on the row) |
<!-- ledger:phases:end -->
## The ranking
<!-- ledger:ranking:start -->
**(a) Ours, the same-node DRAM board at the worse card (the smaller chip edge first):**
No order in this column yet: a cross-chain comparison is made only between cells from the same card, state and session, and the measured cells today come from 2 sessions (lab-cohort-ctl-v6 (COHORT, 11:49 to 12:30 UK, one chain); comparative-lane a2ed5c31 (RunPod, one chain, an earlier session)); the ledger session (both cards, every chain back to back) fills it. Each chain's own number, same card and state, as it stands:
- Igneum: RTX 4090 stock 5.43x (4.31 to 6.30); RTX 5090 stock 3.63x (2.88 to 4.21)
- Ravencoin: RTX 4090 stock 3.94x (3.22 to 4.76); RTX 5090 stock pending (a pending or proxy cell in this row)
- Iron Fish: unranked in this column (no measured card cell yet)
- Ethereum Classic: unranked in this column (no measured card cell yet)
- Ergo: unranked in this column (no measured card cell yet)
**(b) ProgPoW's premise (the chip keeps a GPU-class datapath):**
- Igneum: RTX 4090 1.01x to 1.03x (f 0.853 measured); RTX 5090 1.02x to 1.03x (f 0.811 measured on the stock pod)
- Ravencoin: RTX 4090 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; no measured twin on this kernel yet); RTX 5090 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured)
- Iron Fish: RTX 4090 pending (needs the measured f from the twin); RTX 5090 pending
- Ethereum Classic: RTX 4090 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure; the twin row makes it measured); RTX 5090 1.10x to 1.20x (the premise's own figure)
- Ergo: RTX 4090 pending; RTX 5090 pending
**(c) Phase B, an income a hash chip cannot earn:**
- Igneum: yes by rule (the proving share of every block, 20 percent ratified); LIVE ON DEVNET with on-chain paid records (663 paid v1 segment records to 30 prover keys on chain 4465, the PROVING LIVE lane's file bd3f53c1 on build-1), not yet in a shipped package
- Ravencoin: no (the block reward is mining only)
- Firo: no
- Iron Fish: no
- Ethereum Classic: no
- Ergo: no
<!-- ledger:ranking:end -->
## The claim under test, clause by clause
The sentence below is served as a claim under test, each clause labelled by its state on the rows above. It reads as established
only when every clause is supported; today it is not, and the table says which clause and why.
<!-- ledger:claim:start -->
**The headline, built from the supported clauses only:** under ProgPoW's own convention, the lowest measured chip-to-GPU edge of the chains on this ledger; and the only chain on this ledger whose GPUs are paid, by rule, an income a hash chip cannot earn (LIVE ON DEVNET, on-chain records (the PROVING LIVE lane, read 11:50:22Z 9 October 2026): on chain id 4465 (the Igneum 2.0 devnet) 663 paid v1 segment records (8 shards plus aggregation each) = 653.93 IGN paid from the proving pool to 30 distinct prover keys across chain blocks 3,000 to 30,687 (tip 31,719 at the read), plus 6,474 paid v0 shard records = 7,196 IGN; read by igneum_getProvingStatus, igneum_getSegmentRecords (3,965 segments) and igneum_getSegment; evidence build-1:/srv/artefacts/proving-live/prov-ledger-4465-tip31719-115022Z.json sha256 bd3f53c18c3ffa20354ea62ade9fd5e7a5794202a71c3c369a5be71484f7143a. NOT YET LIVE IN A SHIPPED PACKAGE: the payees are the fleet's prover stack (the same binaries the 2.0.3.1 HiveOS package wraps, cut 18:00 UK); the apps' prover is on by default on 24 GB cards but no app-proved record is on the record yet; a full-epoch line follows by 16:00 UK).
The sentence as ordered, served as the claim under test: "the lowest measured chip-to-GPU edge of any live GPU network under a published method, on both conventions, and the only one whose GPUs earn income a chip cannot"
Rule: the headline reads only what the like-for-like rows support, clause by clause (main's ruling, 13:2x UK 9 October 2026); under the ledger's own convention the measured edge per chain on the same card and state is stated as numbers, with no ranking word until the rows say so after the ledger session.
| clause | convention | state on the current rows | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| under ProgPoW's own convention, the lowest measured chip-to-GPU edge of the chains on this ledger | ProgPoW's premise (a chip that keeps a GPU-class datapath) | SUPPORTED on the current rows | Igneum v6 1.01x to 1.03x (its measured f 0.81 to 0.85) against ProgPoW's own 1.10x to 1.20x for KAWPOW and FiroPoW; FishHash and Etchash pending their twins |
| under the ledger's convention (the cheapest credible programmable specialist, adversarial set v3), each chain's measured edge on the same card and state, as numbers | ours | NUMBERS ONLY; no ranking until the ledger session (COHORT, both cards, every chain back to back, the pinned 0.9.4 kernel, twins; 14:45 UK) | the current cells come from different sessions (the lab's cohort pods for v6, the comparative lane's pod for KAWPOW) and a cross-chain comparison is made only between cells from the same card, state and session; at the RTX 4090 at stock the cells read v6 5.4x (5.67x on the second pod) and KAWPOW 3.9x (a proxy row from an earlier session); FishHash and Etchash pending |
| and the only chain on this ledger whose GPUs are paid, by rule, an income a hash chip cannot earn | phase B, each chain's actual reward split | LABELLED BY THE PROVING LIVE LANE | the proving share (20 percent ratified) is paid to GPUs for work a hash chip cannot do; every other chain on the ledger pays mining only; the live state of that income is the PROVING LIVE lane's evidence line |
Withdrawn: the earlier line 'KAWPOW and FiroPoW read 5 to 6x on the measured 4090 rows and v6 reads 2.35x' is withdrawn: it compared v6 at the 5090's 1,300 MHz knee with KAWPOW at the 4090 at stock, two cards and two states; the like-for-like cells are the ones on this ledger.
The last clause's label from the PROVING LIVE lane: LIVE ON DEVNET, on-chain records (the PROVING LIVE lane, read 11:50:22Z 9 October 2026): on chain id 4465 (the Igneum 2.0 devnet) 663 paid v1 segment records (8 shards plus aggregation each) = 653.93 IGN paid from the proving pool to 30 distinct prover keys across chain blocks 3,000 to 30,687 (tip 31,719 at the read), plus 6,474 paid v0 shard records = 7,196 IGN; read by igneum_getProvingStatus, igneum_getSegmentRecords (3,965 segments) and igneum_getSegment; evidence build-1:/srv/artefacts/proving-live/prov-ledger-4465-tip31719-115022Z.json sha256 bd3f53c18c3ffa20354ea62ade9fd5e7a5794202a71c3c369a5be71484f7143a. NOT YET LIVE IN A SHIPPED PACKAGE: the payees are the fleet's prover stack (the same binaries the 2.0.3.1 HiveOS package wraps, cut 18:00 UK); the apps' prover is on by default on 24 GB cards but no app-proved record is on the record yet; a full-epoch line follows by 16:00 UK
<!-- ledger:claim:end -->
## Reproduce it tonight
The reproduction kit (the pinned references, the harnesses, the sampler, the session script, SHA256SUMS and the expected rows with
their bands) is published from the build host when it lands; the link and its sha256 go here. One command per card; a 4090 at
stock on an uncapped host reproduces the Igneum row inside its band in under ten minutes after the dataset builds.
| item | state |
|---|---|
| the kit | pending |
| the kit's sha256 | pending |

30
docs/plans/igneum-2.0-test-registry.json
View file

@ -20434,7 +20434,7 @@
"plan_status": "NOT RUN",
"run_id": "lab-20261009-01",
"evidence_path": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
"updated": "2026-10-09T12:04:23.606Z",
"updated": "2026-10-09T12:15:20.071Z",
"evidence_record": {
"requirement_id": "R15-01",
"decision": "NOT RUN",
@ -20455,8 +20455,8 @@
},
"claim_impact": "none",
"reviewer": "",
"at": "2026-10-09T12:04:23.606Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
"at": "2026-10-09T12:15:20.071Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:1x UK: CONTROLS' done line (the four controls, Etchash and Autolykos2 staged bit-exact with SUMS); ADVERSARY's cross-chain phase A and B (no chain's emission recovers a board chip; the proving share the one term) and the E9 Pro calibration (1.28x pessimistic); the first founder bundle 985afee6. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
},
"evidence_records": {
"lab:candidate": {
@ -20479,8 +20479,8 @@
},
"claim_impact": "none",
"reviewer": "",
"at": "2026-10-09T12:04:23.606Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
"at": "2026-10-09T12:15:20.071Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:1x UK: CONTROLS' done line (the four controls, Etchash and Autolykos2 staged bit-exact with SUMS); ADVERSARY's cross-chain phase A and B (no chain's emission recovers a board chip; the proving share the one term) and the E9 Pro calibration (1.28x pessimistic); the first founder bundle 985afee6. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
}
},
"in_progress_since": "2026-10-09T10:48:54.646Z",
@ -21144,7 +21144,7 @@
"plan_status": "NOT RUN",
"run_id": "lab-20261009-01",
"evidence_path": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
"updated": "2026-10-09T12:04:23.606Z",
"updated": "2026-10-09T12:15:20.071Z",
"evidence_record": {
"requirement_id": "R15-08",
"decision": "NOT RUN",
@ -21165,8 +21165,8 @@
},
"claim_impact": "none",
"reviewer": "",
"at": "2026-10-09T12:04:23.606Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
"at": "2026-10-09T12:15:20.071Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:1x UK: CONTROLS' done line (the four controls, Etchash and Autolykos2 staged bit-exact with SUMS); ADVERSARY's cross-chain phase A and B (no chain's emission recovers a board chip; the proving share the one term) and the E9 Pro calibration (1.28x pessimistic); the first founder bundle 985afee6. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
},
"evidence_records": {
"lab:candidate": {
@ -21189,8 +21189,8 @@
},
"claim_impact": "none",
"reviewer": "",
"at": "2026-10-09T12:04:23.606Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
"at": "2026-10-09T12:15:20.071Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:1x UK: CONTROLS' done line (the four controls, Etchash and Autolykos2 staged bit-exact with SUMS); ADVERSARY's cross-chain phase A and B (no chain's emission recovers a board chip; the proving share the one term) and the E9 Pro calibration (1.28x pessimistic); the first founder bundle 985afee6. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
}
},
"in_progress_since": "2026-10-09T10:48:54.646Z",
@ -21234,7 +21234,7 @@
"plan_status": "NOT RUN",
"run_id": "lab-20261009-01",
"evidence_path": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
"updated": "2026-10-09T12:04:23.606Z",
"updated": "2026-10-09T12:15:20.071Z",
"evidence_record": {
"requirement_id": "R15-09",
"decision": "NOT RUN",
@ -21255,8 +21255,8 @@
},
"claim_impact": "none",
"reviewer": "",
"at": "2026-10-09T12:04:23.606Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
"at": "2026-10-09T12:15:20.071Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:1x UK: CONTROLS' done line (the four controls, Etchash and Autolykos2 staged bit-exact with SUMS); ADVERSARY's cross-chain phase A and B (no chain's emission recovers a board chip; the proving share the one term) and the E9 Pro calibration (1.28x pessimistic); the first founder bundle 985afee6. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
},
"evidence_records": {
"lab:candidate": {
@ -21279,8 +21279,8 @@
},
"claim_impact": "none",
"reviewer": "",
"at": "2026-10-09T12:04:23.606Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
"at": "2026-10-09T12:15:20.071Z",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:1x UK: CONTROLS' done line (the four controls, Etchash and Autolykos2 staged bit-exact with SUMS); ADVERSARY's cross-chain phase A and B (no chain's emission recovers a board chip; the proving share the one term) and the E9 Pro calibration (1.28x pessimistic); the first founder bundle 985afee6. Every row still NOT RUN until read. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
}
},
"in_progress_since": "2026-10-09T10:48:54.646Z",

3
site/404.html
View file

@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ main{flex:1}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ main{flex:1}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -268,6 +270,7 @@ main{flex:1}
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

13
site/acceptance.html
View file

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

3
site/address.html
View file

@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -200,6 +201,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -325,6 +327,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/app.html
View file

@ -128,6 +128,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -168,6 +169,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -506,6 +508,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/audit.html
View file

@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit" aria-current="page"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit" aria-current="page"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -299,6 +301,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/block.html
View file

@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -200,6 +201,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -318,6 +320,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/build.html
View file

@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -331,6 +333,7 @@ console.log(r.verified, r.signers, 'of', r.voters, 'voters', r.ms, 'ms');</pre>
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

1
site/build.mjs
View file

@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ for (const [src, file, title, desc, heading, lead, eyebrow] of [
['build/grants.md', 'grants.html', 'Igneum grants: tooling, reference apps, infrastructure, research', 'The Igneum grants programme: four tiers, what a grant is, how to apply with an issue on the git host, the weekly review, and the lines that stay honest about value, amounts and dates.', 'Grants', 'Paid in IGN from the dev fee fund, on delivery, on the Igneum 2.0 devnet first. Four tiers. One issue to apply. A weekly review.', 'The programme'],
['build/compatibility.md', 'compatibility.html', 'Igneum compatibility, measured: every row a test run against the devnet', 'Compatibility as a product deliverable: representative contracts, wallet fee estimation, indexing, failed transactions, receipts, application assumptions and the measured differences (block context, randomness, two-dimensional fees), each a test with its evidence. Devnet, no value.', 'Compatibility, measured', 'Every row is a test that ran against the devnet, with its evidence; a row that could not run says why.', 'Build · compatibility'],
['site/audit-2.0.md', 'audit.html', 'Igneum site audit, 2.0', 'Every served page of igneum.network read against the Igneum 2.0 reset: what changed, what was rewritten, what still carries pre-2.0 copy, the label of each claim and what is open.', 'Site audit', 'Every served page, what the reset changed, what was rewritten, what still carries pre-2.0 copy, the label of each claim, and what is open. Main reads it against the live site.', 'Learn · audit'],
['ledger/gpu-ledger.md', 'gpu-ledger.html', 'The GPU network ledger: every live GPU-mined chain measured the same way', 'Every live GPU-mined chain the lab could pin, measured on the same rented cards in the same sessions with the same chip-design method, ranked on the chip-to-GPU edge under two conventions and on the two-phase economics with each chain\'s actual reward split. Every number measured or a labelled model with its source; pending never blank.', 'The GPU network ledger', 'Every live GPU-mined chain we could pin, measured the same way on the same cards, with the same chip method, and ranked. Igneum is one row among the others, under the same rules.', 'Learn · ledger'],
['build/tuning.md', 'tuning.html', 'Igneum tuning: how Ember reaches a good operating point', 'The knee rule with its measured rows, the ladders and priors, the safe defaults per class, the worker flags and their costs, the compiler settings and the fingerprint check: the published optimisation work.', 'Tuning', 'How Ember reaches a good operating point without third-party software, every figure a dated measured row or marked approximate.', 'Learn · audit'],
]) {
const mdp = join(docs, src);

3
site/claims.html
View file

@ -132,6 +132,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims" aria-current="page"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -172,6 +173,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims" aria-current="page"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -303,6 +305,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/compatibility.html
View file

@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -323,6 +325,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/dev-fee.html
View file

@ -132,6 +132,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -172,6 +173,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -308,6 +310,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/docs.html
View file

@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs" aria-current="page"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -146,6 +147,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs" aria-current="page"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -277,6 +279,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/download.html
View file

@ -122,6 +122,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -162,6 +163,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -349,6 +351,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/economics.html
View file

@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics" aria-current="page"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -146,6 +147,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics" aria-current="page"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -341,6 +343,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/evidence.html
View file

@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ td.mono{font-family:var(--f-mono);font-size:12.5px;min-width:180px}td.iv{color:v
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -183,6 +184,7 @@ td.mono{font-family:var(--f-mono);font-size:12.5px;min-width:180px}td.iv{color:v
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -321,6 +323,7 @@ td.mono{font-family:var(--f-mono);font-size:12.5px;min-width:180px}td.iv{color:v
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/explorer.html
View file

@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -199,6 +200,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -360,6 +362,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/faucet.html
View file

@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ dt{color:var(--ash)}dd{margin:0;font-family:var(--f-mono);font-size:14px;overflo
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -176,6 +177,7 @@ dt{color:var(--ash)}dd{margin:0;font-family:var(--f-mono);font-size:14px;overflo
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -307,6 +309,7 @@ dt{color:var(--ash)}dd{margin:0;font-family:var(--f-mono);font-size:14px;overflo
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

385
site/gpu-ledger.html Normal file
View file

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

3
site/grants.html
View file

@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -307,6 +309,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/income.html
View file

@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -146,6 +147,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -257,6 +259,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/index.html
View file

@ -124,6 +124,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -164,6 +165,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -330,6 +332,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/ledger.html
View file

@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ blockquote{margin:10px 0;padding:10px 14px;border-left:3px solid var(--line-2);c
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger" aria-current="page"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ blockquote{margin:10px 0;padding:10px 14px;border-left:3px solid var(--line-2);c
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger" aria-current="page"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -484,6 +486,7 @@ blockquote{margin:10px 0;padding:10px 14px;border-left:3px solid var(--line-2);c
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/light.html
View file

@ -140,6 +140,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -180,6 +181,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -333,6 +335,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/litepaper.html
View file

@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ body.all .pager{display:none}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -229,6 +230,7 @@ body.all .pager{display:none}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -909,6 +911,7 @@ body.all .pager{display:none}
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/live.html
View file

@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ details.tablebar summary{display:flex;align-items:center}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -313,6 +314,7 @@ details.tablebar summary{display:flex;align-items:center}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -548,6 +550,7 @@ details.tablebar summary{display:flex;align-items:center}
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/metamask.html
View file

@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ ol{margin:0 0 14px;padding-left:22px}li{margin-bottom:6px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ ol{margin:0 0 14px;padding-left:22px}li{margin-bottom:6px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -323,6 +325,7 @@ ol{margin:0 0 14px;padding-left:22px}li{margin-bottom:6px}
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/miner.html
View file

@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ pre b{color:var(--molten-text);font-weight:500}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -169,6 +170,7 @@ pre b{color:var(--molten-text);font-weight:500}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -494,6 +496,7 @@ pre b{color:var(--molten-text);font-weight:500}
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/miners.html
View file

@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -362,6 +364,7 @@ table.bench2 tr.detail .d{display:block;margin:0 0 4px}table.bench2 tr.detail b{
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/oracle.html
View file

@ -140,6 +140,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -180,6 +181,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -335,6 +337,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

1
site/partials/footer.html
View file

@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

2
site/partials/nav.html
View file

@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -88,6 +89,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>

3
site/prize.html
View file

@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize" aria-current="page"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -146,6 +147,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize" aria-current="page"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -265,6 +267,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/provenance.html
View file

@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance" aria-current="page"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance" aria-current="page"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -306,6 +308,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/proving.html
View file

@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -199,6 +200,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -337,6 +339,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/randomx.html
View file

@ -132,6 +132,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx" aria-current="page"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -172,6 +173,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx" aria-current="page"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -297,6 +299,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/receipt.html
View file

@ -138,6 +138,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -178,6 +179,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -332,6 +334,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/scenes.html
View file

@ -124,6 +124,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -164,6 +165,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -299,6 +301,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/scorecard.html
View file

@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard" aria-current="page"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -146,6 +147,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard" aria-current="page"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -274,6 +276,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

1
site/sitemap.xml
View file

@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
<url><loc>https://igneum.network/oracle</loc><lastmod>2026-10-08</lastmod><changefreq>weekly</changefreq><priority>0.6</priority></url>
<url><loc>https://igneum.network/miners</loc><lastmod>2026-10-07</lastmod><changefreq>weekly</changefreq><priority>0.6</priority></url>
<url><loc>https://igneum.network/claims</loc><lastmod>2026-10-07</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq><priority>0.5</priority></url>
<url><loc>https://igneum.network/gpu-ledger</loc><lastmod>2026-10-09</lastmod><changefreq>weekly</changefreq><priority>0.6</priority></url>
<url><loc>https://igneum.network/randomx</loc><lastmod>2026-10-07</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq><priority>0.5</priority></url>
<url><loc>https://igneum.network/provenance</loc><lastmod>2026-10-07</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq><priority>0.4</priority></url>
<url><loc>https://igneum.network/dev-fee</loc><lastmod>2026-10-07</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq><priority>0.4</priority></url>

3
site/swap.html
View file

@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ dt{color:var(--ash)}dd{margin:0;font-family:var(--f-mono);font-size:13px;overflo
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -183,6 +184,7 @@ dt{color:var(--ash)}dd{margin:0;font-family:var(--f-mono);font-size:13px;overflo
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -357,6 +359,7 @@ dt{color:var(--ash)}dd{margin:0;font-family:var(--f-mono);font-size:13px;overflo
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/tuning.html
View file

@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -317,6 +319,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/tx.html
View file

@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -200,6 +201,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -313,6 +315,7 @@ main{padding-bottom:100px}.card{background:var(--row);border:1px solid var(--lin
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

3
site/wallet.html
View file

@ -142,6 +142,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -182,6 +183,7 @@
<a href="/economics" data-nav="economics"><b>Economics</b><span>The emission, the split and the fees, each with its line in the node.</span></a><a href="/scorecard" data-nav="scorecard"><b>Scorecard</b><span>The twelve acceptance gates, their evidence and where each stands.</span></a><a href="/prize" data-nav="prize"><b>Prize</b><span>A better adversary or a reproduced shortcut, never a confirmation: the terms.</span></a><a href="/acceptance" data-nav="acceptance"><b>Acceptance</b><span>The Test and Acceptance Standard, case by case, as each one passes.</span></a><a href="/audit" data-nav="audit"><b>Site audit</b><span>Every page, what the reset changed and what is open.</span></a><a href="/docs" data-nav="docs"><b>Documents</b><span>The plan, the standard, the specifications and the evidence files, by path.</span></a>
<a href="/ledger" data-nav="ledger"><b>Ledger</b><span>Every criticism, answered or conceded.</span></a>
<a href="/claims" data-nav="claims"><b>What Igneum does not claim</b><span>The limits, stated first.</span></a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger" data-nav="gpu-ledger"><b>GPU network ledger</b><span>Every GPU-mined chain, measured the same way.</span></a>
<a href="/randomx" data-nav="randomx"><b>Igneum vs RandomX</b><span>What was kept and what was rebuilt for GPUs.</span></a>
<a href="/provenance" data-nav="provenance"><b>Built on the shoulders</b><span>Every borrowed part, credited.</span></a>
</div>
@ -431,6 +433,7 @@
<a href="/evidence">Evidence</a>
<a href="/ledger">Ledger: every criticism</a>
<a href="/claims">What Igneum does not claim</a>
<a href="/gpu-ledger">GPU network ledger</a>
<a href="/randomx">Igneum vs RandomX</a>
<a href="/provenance">Built on the shoulders</a>
</div></div>

2
tools/ci/batches/lab-20261009-01.json
View file

@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
"in_progress": true,
"method": "model",
"evidence": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read.",
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. 12:3x UK: the first cohort cells (ctl-v6 at stock on rented 5090, 5080 and 3090 pods: the worst cell the 3090 at 8,429 nJ = 5.46x on set v2's same-node board, PARTIAL, the dataset size under decision after CONTROLS measured the live 4 GiB object at 2.4x the 1 GiB research pack's rate); X10's first measured cell (cand-x10b on the 4090 at stock 3,653 nJ per lane-work = 5.8x on the board; the fold buys nothing); set v3 (routed 64-register and multiply-xor lanes); the fourth to sixth review rulings (8c); the 4 GiB rule (8e). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 12:4x UK: ctl-v6's first full score over the NVIDIA cohort at stock (the worst cell the RTX 4090 uncapped 8,751 nJ = 5.67x on set v2's same-node board; every cell at 4 GiB, the earlier 2.4x reading an instrument artefact, corrected once); the two-phase rows (ADVERSARY 545f3f8a0, 36d17b15c): phase B NOT LIVE until a shipped package proves, the shipping row open; SEARCH's twenty candidates on set v3 none under 1.5x on any cell (SCREEN). Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:0x UK: the decider closed on both cards (the 4 GiB object costs 2.0 to 2.9 percent of rate against its 1 GiB export; the 2.4x reading withdrawn as a contention fault); the read-headroom row answered (both cards at their activation limit); the uncapped 5090 cell 5,980 nJ = 3.88x on the board; the shipping row's facts by file and line with the Devnet 4 correction (a 24 GB card proves the v1 shard now; the proving row NOT LIVE until the epoch record by 16:00); the 4 GiB cap defined as the mining dataset floor only; the founder's ledger order (8f) applied. Every row still NOT RUN until read. 13:1x UK: CONTROLS' done line (the four controls, Etchash and Autolykos2 staged bit-exact with SUMS); ADVERSARY's cross-chain phase A and B (no chain's emission recovers a board chip; the proving share the one term) and the E9 Pro calibration (1.28x pessimistic); the first founder bundle 985afee6. Every row still NOT RUN until read.",
"claim_impact": "none"
}
],

2
tools/ci/site-nav-check.mjs
View file

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ const here = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
const GROUPS = {
mine: ['/miner', '/download', '/app', '/wallet', '/miners', '/tuning', '/dev-fee', '/metamask'],
network: ['/live', '/explorer', '/evidence', '/light', '/receipt', '/oracle'],
learn: ['/litepaper', '/income', '/economics', '/scorecard', '/prize', '/audit', '/docs', '/ledger', '/claims', '/randomx', '/provenance', '/acceptance'],
learn: ['/litepaper', '/income', '/economics', '/scorecard', '/prize', '/audit', '/docs', '/ledger', '/claims', '/gpu-ledger', '/randomx', '/provenance', '/acceptance'],
build: ['/build', '/faucet', '/swap', '/grants', '/compatibility'], // the builder programme (8 October 2026): the developer entry page, the Devnet 3 faucet, the swap, the grants
};
const ROUTES = Object.values(GROUPS).flat();

155
tools/ledger/render.mjs Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
// The GPU network ledger: one data file, every table rendered from it (the record README, the public page, the kit's README),
// so no two copies of a row can drift. Run from the repository root:
// node tools/ledger/render.mjs rewrite the marked blocks of the record and the page from ledger.json
// node tools/ledger/render.mjs --check exit 1 if either file is out of step with ledger.json (the gate's form)
// node tools/ledger/render.mjs --kit <dir> also write <dir>/ROWS.md (the expected rows and their bands) for a reproduction kit
// Every block sits between <!-- ledger:<name>:start --> and <!-- ledger:<name>:end --> in the markdown; the text outside is hand-written.
import { readFileSync, writeFileSync, existsSync, mkdirSync } from 'node:fs';
import { join, dirname } from 'node:path';
import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
const here = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
const repo = join(here, '..', '..');
const DATA = join(repo, 'docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/ledger/ledger.json');
const RECORD = join(repo, 'docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/ledger/README.md');
const PAGE = join(repo, 'docs/ledger/gpu-ledger.md');
const L = JSON.parse(readFileSync(DATA, 'utf8'));
const n = (x, d = 0) => x == null ? 'pending' : Number(x).toLocaleString('en-GB', { minimumFractionDigits: d, maximumFractionDigits: d });
const gb = b => b == null ? 'pending' : `${(b / 1e9).toFixed(2)} GB (${n(b)} bytes)`;
const chainOf = id => L.chains.find(c => c.id === id);
const cellOf = (c, card) => (c.same_row_as ? chainOf(c.same_row_as) : c).cells[card];
const advOf = c => (c.same_row_as ? chainOf(c.same_row_as) : c).adversary;
const x = (v, d = 2) => v == null ? 'pending' : `${v.toFixed(d)}x`;
// the ratio of a measured card cell over a modelled chip row, with the chip's band (a lower chip energy is a larger ratio)
function ratio(cell, chip) {
if (!cell || cell.nj == null || !chip || chip.nominal == null) return null;
const r = { nominal: cell.nj / chip.nominal };
if (chip.low != null && chip.high != null) { r.low = cell.nj / chip.high; r.high = cell.nj / chip.low; }
return r;
}
const band = r => r == null ? 'pending' : (r.low != null ? `${x(r.nominal)} (${r.low.toFixed(2)} to ${r.high.toFixed(2)})` : x(r.nominal));
const provisional = c => {
const cells = L.cards.map(k => cellOf(c, k.id));
return cells.some(cell => !cell || cell.nj == null || /proxy|prior row/i.test(cell.status || ''));
};
function tableCards() {
const head = '| chain | algorithm | dataset on the row | reward split (mining / proving) | ' + L.cards.map(k => `${k.name} ${k.state}: nJ per hash (MH/s, W, f)`).join(' | ') + ' | twin | sources |';
const sep = '|' + '---|'.repeat(5 + L.cards.length) + '---|---|';
const rows = L.chains.map(c => {
if (c.not_run) return `| ${c.chain} | ${c.algorithm} | NOT RUN | ${c.split.mining} / ${c.split.proving} | ${L.cards.map(() => 'NOT RUN').join(' | ')} | NOT RUN | ${c.not_run} |`;
if (c.same_row_as) return `| ${c.chain} | ${c.algorithm} | = ${chainOf(c.same_row_as).chain}'s row | ${c.split.mining} / ${c.split.proving} | ${L.cards.map(() => `= ${chainOf(c.same_row_as).chain}'s row`).join(' | ')} | as ${chainOf(c.same_row_as).chain} | ${c.pin} |`;
const cells = L.cards.map(k => {
const cell = c.cells[k.id];
if (!cell || cell.nj == null) return `pending: ${cell ? cell.status : 'no cell'}${cell && cell.mhs != null ? ` (rate only ${n(cell.mhs, 2)} MH/s)` : ''}`;
return `${n(cell.nj)} ${cell.status} (${n(cell.mhs, 2)} MH/s, ${n(cell.w, 1)} W, f ${cell.f == null ? 'none' : cell.f.toFixed(3)}; spread ${cell.spread_pct == null ? 'none' : cell.spread_pct + '%'}; ${cell.pod}; ${cell.clock})`;
});
const src = L.cards.map(k => c.cells[k.id] && c.cells[k.id].source && c.cells[k.id].source !== 'pending' ? `${k.name}: ${c.cells[k.id].source}` : null).filter(Boolean).join('; ') || 'pending';
return `| ${c.chain} | ${c.algorithm} | ${gb(c.dataset_bytes)}; ${c.dataset_note} | ${c.split.mining} / ${c.split.proving} (${c.split.source}) | ${cells.join(' | ')} | ${c.twin} | ${src} |`;
});
return [head, sep, ...rows].join('\n');
}
function tableEdge() {
const head = '| chain | the cheapest credible same-node DRAM board (set ' + L.adversarial_set + ', nJ per hash, band) | ' + L.cards.map(k => `ratio at the ${k.name} ${k.state} (ours)`).join(' | ') + ' | ' + L.cards.map(k => `ProgPoW-premise ratio at the ${k.name}`).join(' | ') + ' | the die as the residual (nJ; ratio at the worse card) | real chip on the market | source |';
const sep = '|' + '---|'.repeat(2 + 2 * L.cards.length) + '---|---|---|';
const rows = L.chains.map(c => {
if (c.not_run) return `| ${c.chain} | NOT RUN | ${L.cards.map(() => 'NOT RUN').join(' | ')} | ${L.cards.map(() => 'NOT RUN').join(' | ')} | NOT RUN | none | NOT RUN |`;
const a = advOf(c);
const boardCell = a.board ? `${n(a.board.nominal)} (${n(a.board.low)} to ${n(a.board.high)}); ${a.board.design}; split ${a.board.split_nj}; ${a.status}` : `pending: ${a.status}`;
const ours = L.cards.map(k => band(ratio(cellOf(c, k.id), a.board)));
const prem = L.cards.map(k => (a.premise && a.premise[k.id]) || 'pending');
const worst = L.cards.map(k => ratio(cellOf(c, k.id), a.die ? { nominal: a.die.nominal } : null)).filter(Boolean).sort((p, q) => q.nominal - p.nominal)[0];
const die = a.die ? `${n(a.die.nominal)} (${a.die.design}); ${worst ? x(worst.nominal, 1) : 'pending'}` : 'pending';
const chip = c.real_chip ? `${c.real_chip.name}: ${n(c.real_chip.mhs)} MH/s at ${n(c.real_chip.w)} W = ${n(c.real_chip.nj)} nJ per hash, ${c.real_chip.status}; ${c.real_chip.source}` : 'none on the market';
const src = c.same_row_as ? `= ${chainOf(c.same_row_as).chain}'s row` : a.source;
return `| ${c.chain}${c.same_row_as ? ` (= ${chainOf(c.same_row_as).chain}'s row)` : ''} | ${boardCell} | ${ours.join(' | ')} | ${prem.join(' | ')} | ${die} | ${chip} | ${src} |`;
});
return [head, sep, ...rows].join('\n');
}
function tablePhases() {
const head = '| chain | split | phase A (before investment) | phase B (spend sunk) | an income a hash chip cannot earn | source |';
const sep = '|---|---|---|---|---|---|';
const rows = L.chains.map(c => `| ${c.chain} | ${c.split.mining} / ${c.split.proving} | ${c.phases.A} | ${c.phases.B} | ${c.phases.income_a_chip_cannot_earn} | ${c.phases.source}; ${c.phases.status} |`);
return [head, sep, ...rows].join('\n');
}
function mechanism() {
const m = L.mechanism; if (!m) return '';
const lines = [`**${m.title}**`, '', '| chain | the memory traffic per hash | what it costs the card | what it costs the chip | consequence for the ratio |', '|---|---|---|---|---|'];
for (const r of m.rows) lines.push(`| ${r.chain} | ${r.traffic} | ${r.card_cost} | ${r.chip_cost} | ${r.consequence} |`);
lines.push('', m.note);
return lines.join('\n');
}
function ranking() {
const scored = L.chains.filter(c => !c.not_run && !c.same_row_as).map(c => {
const a = advOf(c);
const cells = L.cards.map(k => cellOf(c, k.id));
const rs = cells.map(cell => ratio(cell, a.board)).filter(Boolean);
const worst = rs.length ? Math.max(...rs.map(r => r.nominal)) : null;
const sessions = cells.filter(cell => cell && cell.nj != null).map(cell => cell.session || 'unstated');
return { c, worst, rs, sessions, prov: provisional(c) || rs.length < L.cards.length };
});
// a cross-chain ORDER exists only when every compared cell comes from one session on the same card and state (main's ruling)
const measured = scored.filter(s => s.worst != null);
const allSessions = new Set(measured.flatMap(s => s.sessions));
const lines = ['**(a) Ours, the same-node DRAM board at the worse card (the smaller chip edge first):**'];
if (measured.length >= 2 && allSessions.size === 1 && measured.every(s => !s.prov)) {
measured.sort((p, q) => p.worst - q.worst).forEach((s, i) => lines.push(`${i + 1}. ${s.c.chain}: ${x(s.worst)}`));
} else {
lines.push(`No order in this column yet: a cross-chain comparison is made only between cells from the same card, state and session, and the measured cells today come from ${allSessions.size} sessions (${[...allSessions].join('; ')}); the ledger session (both cards, every chain back to back) fills it. Each chain's own number, same card and state, as it stands:`);
for (const s of measured) lines.push(`- ${s.c.chain}: ${L.cards.map((k, i) => `${k.name} ${k.state} ${band(ratio(cellOf(s.c, k.id), advOf(s.c).board))}`).join('; ')}${s.prov ? ' (a pending or proxy cell in this row)' : ''}`);
}
scored.filter(s => s.worst == null).forEach(s => lines.push(`- ${s.c.chain}: unranked in this column (no measured card cell yet)`));
lines.push('', '**(b) ProgPoW\'s premise (the chip keeps a GPU-class datapath):**');
for (const c of L.chains.filter(c => !c.not_run && !c.same_row_as)) lines.push(`- ${c.chain}: ${L.cards.map(k => `${k.name} ${(advOf(c).premise && advOf(c).premise[k.id]) || 'pending'}`).join('; ')}`);
lines.push('', '**(c) Phase B, an income a hash chip cannot earn:**');
for (const c of L.chains) lines.push(`- ${c.chain}: ${c.phases.income_a_chip_cannot_earn}${c.not_run ? ' (NOT RUN)' : ''}`);
return lines.join('\n');
}
function claim() {
const k = L.claim;
const supported = k.clauses.filter(c => /^SUPPORTED/.test(c.state)).map(c => c.text);
const lines = ['**The headline, built from the supported clauses only:** ' + (supported.length ? supported.join('; ') + '; ' : '') + `${k.clauses[k.clauses.length - 1].text} (${k.proving_live_label}).`, '',
`The sentence as ordered, served as the claim under test: "${k.ordered_sentence}"`, '', `Rule: ${k.headline_rule}.`, '',
'| clause | convention | state on the current rows | why |', '|---|---|---|---|'];
for (const c of k.clauses) lines.push(`| ${c.text} | ${c.convention} | ${c.state} | ${c.why} |`);
lines.push('', `Withdrawn: ${k.withdrawn}.`, '', `The last clause's label from the PROVING LIVE lane: ${k.proving_live_label}`);
return lines.join('\n');
}
const BLOCKS = { cards: tableCards(), edge: tableEdge(), phases: tablePhases(), ranking: ranking(), mechanism: mechanism(), claim: claim(), stamp: `Data: ledger.json, stamp ${L.stamp}, adversarial set ${L.adversarial_set} (${L.adversarial_set_source}).` };
function fill(path) {
let s = readFileSync(path, 'utf8'); let changed = false;
for (const [name, body] of Object.entries(BLOCKS)) {
const re = new RegExp(`(<!-- ledger:${name}:start -->)[\\s\\S]*?(<!-- ledger:${name}:end -->)`);
if (!re.test(s)) continue;
const next = s.replace(re, `$1\n${body}\n$2`);
if (next !== s) { s = next; changed = true; }
}
return { s, changed };
}
const args = process.argv.slice(2);
const check = args.includes('--check');
const kitAt = args.indexOf('--kit') >= 0 ? args[args.indexOf('--kit') + 1] : null;
let red = 0;
for (const p of [RECORD, PAGE]) {
if (!existsSync(p)) continue;
const { s, changed } = fill(p);
if (check) { if (changed) { console.log(`ledger: ${p} is out of step with ledger.json`); red = 1; } }
else if (changed) { writeFileSync(p, s); console.log(`ledger: wrote ${p}`); }
}
if (kitAt) {
mkdirSync(kitAt, { recursive: true });
const rows = ['# Expected rows (the ledger, stamp ' + L.stamp + ')', '', 'A reproduction on the same card class at stock passes when its nJ per hash sits inside the band below (the spread of the lab\'s own repeats, 5 percent either side of the median; a board power cap or a locked clock puts the row outside the method).', '', '| chain | card | expected nJ per hash | band (pass) | the lab\'s cell |', '|---|---|---|---|---|'];
for (const c of L.chains) for (const k of L.cards) { const cell = cellOf(c, k.id); if (cell && cell.nj != null) rows.push(`| ${c.chain} | ${k.name} ${k.state} | ${n(cell.nj)} | ${n(cell.nj * 0.95)} to ${n(cell.nj * 1.05)} | ${cell.pod}; ${cell.source} |`); else if (!c.same_row_as) rows.push(`| ${c.chain} | ${k.name} ${k.state} | pending | pending | ${cell ? cell.status : 'NOT RUN'} |`); }
writeFileSync(join(kitAt, 'ROWS.md'), rows.join('\n') + '\n'); console.log(`ledger: wrote ${join(kitAt, 'ROWS.md')}`);
}
process.exit(red);