1.5x lab: the coexistence table as the scoreboard's headline (section 8b), adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6 board 2.57x, the fused tail CLAIMED), SEARCH's first screen
Documents only; nothing on the devnet touched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
igneum-labs
parent
cebdc64fac
commit
db2eb5d147
4 changed files with 72 additions and 35 deletions
|
|
@ -225,6 +225,33 @@ rest of the ALU mix is dropped), so the twin's address stream equals the full ke
|
|||
<kernel sha>` without a trace instrument; the same ruling covers ctl-v6 (the X7 twin, kernel 93a6a5ce): `twin_addr=none` is accepted
|
||||
on the control rows and no instrument is built before the first candidate.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8b. The coexistence table (the founder, 12:0x UK; the scoreboard's headline beside the energy ratio; ADVERSARY's job, due with the controls this afternoon)
|
||||
|
||||
The outcome the founder has set is COEXISTENCE: GPU owners remain competitive, no lasting overwhelming supplier advantage, no
|
||||
emergency intervention. So every control and candidate carries a coexistence table next to its score, built by ADVERSARY with the
|
||||
placed core and the X8b dollar method, every number a WITNESS with its source, the fleet size and the design-cost assumption
|
||||
stated on the row, no raw hashes. Rows per adversary: the same-node DRAM board, the stored-half hybrid, the N2 SRAM die, the
|
||||
node-ahead board. Columns:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Energy edge at the knee: the card's nJ per hash over the chip's (the complete machine), with the band.
|
||||
2. Chip capital per MH/s in USD: the die (the placed core's mm2 at the node x the claimed wafer cost and yield), the memory (4 GiB
|
||||
of GDDR7, USD 320 of devices of record, or the SRAM at USD 250 per GiB claimed), the board and assembly (USD 200 of record), the
|
||||
design cost (the mask set and the design team, the sum stated) spread over a stated fleet (machines and MH/s); against the card's
|
||||
USD per MH/s on the SAME object (15.7 of record on the X8b row; 30.6 on the frozen v6 at the knee in adv-set v1): both pairs
|
||||
stated.
|
||||
3. The GPU owner's electricity-only cost per hash at three prices, USD 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 per kWh, in USD per TH (nJ per hash x
|
||||
price per kWh / 3,600; the card is sunk).
|
||||
4. The chip's all-in cost per hash at the same three prices, USD per TH: its electricity (its nJ per hash x the price) plus its
|
||||
capital per MH/s amortised over a stated life (months, straight line, the chip's sustained MH/s) plus the design-cost share; the
|
||||
life and the fleet stated on the row.
|
||||
5. The verdict per row and per price: does the chip's all-in cost per hash fall BELOW the GPU owner's electricity-only cost per hash?
|
||||
yes = the GPU owner is pushed out; no = coexistence holds. The row prints the margin (chip all-in over GPU electricity-only) so a
|
||||
reader sees how far from the line it sits.
|
||||
|
||||
The table's file: scratchpad/lab/adv/<cand id>-coexistence.json beside the design rows (the same keys as the columns above, one
|
||||
object per adversary row with its assumptions) and the lane's README section; LAB carries the four verdict cells (one per
|
||||
adversary row at USD 0.10) on TABLE.md beside the score, the full table in the landed README.
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. The lane briefs, one line each
|
||||
|
||||
- CONTROLS: the four controls as rows of the table: `ctl-v6` from the record and re-measured on the cohort; `ctl-progpow-094`
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,19 +1,21 @@
|
|||
<!-- the landed copy of the lab's candidate table at this landing; the live table is scratchpad/lab/TABLE.md on the LAB lane's Mac -->
|
||||
|
||||
# The 1.5x laboratory candidate table (LAB; current as of 11:5x UK 9 October 2026; the interface: scratchpad/lab/INTERFACE.md)
|
||||
# The 1.5x laboratory candidate table (LAB; current as of 12:1x UK 9 October 2026; the interface: scratchpad/lab/INTERFACE.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Score = the WORST comparison over the cohort (same node and one node ahead), the candidate's GPU energy per accepted work over the
|
||||
lowest credible specialist energy for the same work (section 3 of the interface). PASS is never written here. Every chip figure
|
||||
is a WITNESS (E_D) unless marked BOUND. Energies in nJ per hash unless stated.
|
||||
lowest credible specialist energy for the same work (section 3 of the interface). The working scope since 11:5x UK (section 8a):
|
||||
the same-node board is the energy claim; the die and node-ahead chips are coexistence rows. The coexistence table (section 8b) is
|
||||
the headline beside the score. PASS is never written here. Every chip figure is a WITNESS (E_D) unless marked BOUND or CLAIMED.
|
||||
Energies in nJ per hash unless stated.
|
||||
|
||||
| id | kind | tree and packs | resource line | cohort rows (board power; wall BLOCKED on every rented pod) | adversary rows (adv-set, convention) | worst score (band) | status | next move (owner, clock UK) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| ctl-v6 | control (frozen) | 1a938abe4; hl-v6-all 0x9d40978601a7df2a (fp 59e6708e46f1e87c); signing 2a1d6caab4c24564; l8off kit c20999d1, worker 218ca414 | 4 GiB dataset, 256 reads per hash, W = 1 (4 B of a 64 B item), 62,120 instructions (102,612 counted), state class, layer 8 ON | record: house 5090 knee 4,011 / stock 5,842 (report 05f00bd8, enclosure caveat); rented 5090 stock 6,470; rented 4090 stock 8,091 with twin 6,899 (f 0.853); 3090, 5080 (record has class v4 only), AMD, Intel: NOT RUN | record (X0 5b = adv-set v0, instruction convention, complete machine, knee numerator): DRAM board 2.35x same (1.90 to 2.65), 2.51x ahead; stored-half hybrid 3.5 to 3.7x; N2 die 7.8x same (a = 513 nJ), the worst credible; recomputation never credible | at least 7.8x on the record (the die, same node, the 5090 knee; the die a node ahead not in the record); NOT the lab's score: the cohort rows and adv-set v1 pending | NOT RUN (cohort partial; adversary v1 pending) | COHORT: 5090, 4090, 3090, 5080 stock rows with twins, AMD and Intel tiers or NOT RUN with the reason; ADVERSARY: adv-set v1 on the frozen traces at N5 and N3, instruction convention, by 13:4x |
|
||||
| ctl-progpow-094 | control | CONTROLS to pin: the official ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference from source with its test vectors (kawpowminer master a proxy only) | CONTROLS to state (its own equivalence contract before any number) | NOT RUN | NOT RUN (the record carries two conventions: 1.1 to 1.2x on ProgPoW's premise that a chip keeps a GPU-class datapath; 5 to 6x for KAWPOW and FiroPoW on our 4090 rows under our method) | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | CONTROLS: the pinned build, the test vectors read back, the equivalence contract, by 15:00; COHORT rows 15:00; ADVERSARY 16:00 |
|
||||
| ctl-fishhash | control | CONTROLS to pin: Iron Fish's implemented GPU design (the reviewed version named by commit) | CONTROLS to state | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | CONTROLS: the pinned build and the equivalence contract, by 15:00; COHORT 15:00; ADVERSARY 16:00 |
|
||||
| ctl-coop-arx | control and candidate | CONTROLS: the cooperative ARX kernel (lanes on one 256 B entry per fetch, every byte consumed, the arithmetic feeding the next address) plus the CPU reference, by 14:00 | target: the card's non-ARX energy share f at or under 14.8 percent (the screen R = 1 / ((1 - f) / 1.3 + f / 13)); spills, sync, generation and finalisation counted | NOT RUN | NOT RUN (the adversary free to fuse ops, change the state organisation, use full SRAM) | screen only once f is measured | NOT RUN | CONTROLS 14:00; COHORT card rows (the memory energy share, J per hash, stock and knee where a lock holds, 4090 and 5090) 15:00; ADVERSARY redesign 16:00; LAB reading 16:00 |
|
||||
|
||||
| cand-x10 | candidate (the founder's third review, 11:5x UK; the scoped same-node board claim; interface section 8a) | SEARCH: the full-sector fold object exactly as reviewed, CPU reference + CUDA kernel by 14:00, the kit and the trace 14:30 | 4 GiB dataset; dependent 32 B sector loads, every byte folded (32-bit MAD, XOR, shifts); 64 loads to start, the count set by the 10 percent joules budget on the locked 5090; 64-register window; a 32-lane shuffle every four ops; no mul64, division, wide permute or matmul; the 0.995 address-share floor; the verifier one warp under 10 ms | NOT RUN (the frozen denominator: locked 5090 and 5080, a 4090, one AMD card; v6 and X10 paired; the AMD tier NOT RUN "no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software" until the hourly provider check finds one) | NOT RUN (ADVERSARY: the same-node board under the reviewer's model rule with the energy split, both conventions; the die and node-ahead as coexistence rows) | NOT RUN; the claim column is the board; the die and node-ahead beside it as coexistence | NOT RUN | CONTROLS: the readwidth fact of record 12:30, the sector-read rows (with and without the full fold, 5090 and 4090, twin method) 14:00; SEARCH 14:00 and 14:30; ADVERSARY: the v6 split 13:30, the X10 board rows within an hour of the trace; COHORT: the X10 rows within an hour of the kit; LAB: the verdict line within an hour of the last row |
|
||||
| id | kind | tree and packs | resource line | cohort rows (board power; wall BLOCKED on every rented pod) | adversary rows (adv-set v1, instruction convention, complete machine) | worst score (band) | coexistence (section 8b) | status | next move (owner, clock UK) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| ctl-v6 | control (frozen) | 1a938abe4; hl-v6-all 0x9d40978601a7df2a (fp 59e6708e46f1e87c); signing 2a1d6caab4c24564; l8off kit c20999d1, worker 218ca414; COHORT's set: the X7 kit's gen-6 worker f5f3846c, pack x1-ctrl-ds30 (0x2a1d6caab4c24564) | 4 GiB dataset, 256 reads per hash, W = 1 (4 B of a 64 B item; CONTROLS to confirm the readwidth fact of record by 12:30), 62,120 instructions (102,612 counted), state class, layer 8 ON | record: house 5090 knee 4,011 / stock 5,842 (report 05f00bd8, enclosure caveat); rented 5090 stock 6,470; rented 4090 stock 8,091 with twin 6,899 (f 0.853). IN FLIGHT (COHORT, from 11:49): 5090 x2, 4090 x2, 3090 x2, 5080 x2 rented pods, three timed runs per pack per state with the twin, rows 12:1x to 12:3x. AMD and Intel: NOT RUN "no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software" (hourly retry, next 12:4x) | v1 (ADVERSARY 12:0x, commit 0344ec150 on class-v6-adversary; the calibration reproduces X0 5b: 1,706 vs 1,707 nJ on the v0 board, the die 511 vs 513): a_same 353 (277 to 463; the N2 die with the sized and fused lane), a_ahead 286; the cheapest DRAM board 1,558 (fused lane) = 2.57x (2.04 to 3.00) same node, 2.68x a node ahead, USD 8.91 per MH/s against the card's 30.6; ProgPoW's premise column 1.01x to 1.02x (f 0.908). The fused tail (0.6 of the row) is CLAIMED until the routed arxf lanes land (about 12:4x) | on the 5090 knee numerator only: the board (the claim column) 2.57x (2.04 to 3.00) same node, 2.68x ahead; the die 11.4x (8.7 to 14.5) same, 14.0x ahead (coexistence rows). RE-RANK from v0: the board 2.35x to 2.57x (the shadow's 55,296 instructions fit an 8-register flop lane at 3.5 pJ instead of the 64-register SRAM-window core at 5.05). NOT the lab's score until the cohort rows are in | NOT RUN (ADVERSARY, due with the controls this afternoon) | NOT RUN (cohort in flight; adversary v1 in, the fused tail CLAIMED) | COHORT: the eight rows 12:3x; ADVERSARY: the routed fused lanes 12:4x, the coexistence table this afternoon; LAB: the worst-cohort score within an hour of the last row |
|
||||
| ctl-progpow-094 | control | CONTROLS to pin: the official ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference from source with its test vectors (kawpowminer master a proxy only); ADVERSARY's v1 rows use the KAWPOW census as the proxy until the pin | CONTROLS to state (its own equivalence contract before any number); 16 KB per hash of DRAM traffic (ADVERSARY) | NOT RUN (the record's 4090 stock row 6,920 used by ADVERSARY as the numerator) | v1 (proxy): a_same 526 (417 to 873; near-memory in HBM3 base dies, fused lane) = 13.2x (7.9 to 16.6) vs the 4090 at stock, a_ahead 447 = 15.5x, USD 4.95; the cheapest DRAM board 1,614 = 4.29x (3.50 to 5.22) same node, 4.51x ahead, USD 6.89 against 29.7; the board bandwidth-bound at 16 KB per hash (93 MH/s per board; the 11:3x conventions row corrected: 2,003 nJ at USD 6.89, 3.45x on the same core); recomputation from the 85 MB cache 60 to 80 uJ, never credible; ProgPoW's premise column 1.1x to 1.2x (no twin) | on the 4090 stock numerator, proxy: the board 4.29x (3.50 to 5.22) same, 4.51x ahead; the die 13.2x. NOT the lab's score: the pinned 0.9.4 build, the cohort rows and a twin pending | NOT RUN | NOT RUN (proxy rows only) | CONTROLS: the pinned build, the test vectors read back, the equivalence contract, by 15:00; COHORT rows 15:00 with a read-only twin for the premise column; ADVERSARY re-prices on the pinned object |
|
||||
| ctl-fishhash | control | CONTROLS to pin: Iron Fish's implemented GPU design (the reviewed version named by commit); ADVERSARY read cpp/FishHash.cpp | 32 iterations x 3 fetches of 128 B = 96 random reads over a fixed 4.83 GB dataset, about 9,400 lane-instructions of 64-bit multiply-add and FNV (ADVERSARY's read) | NOT RUN (COHORT's card row owed) | v1: a_same 162 (128 to 225; three N2 reticles, fused lane), a_ahead 155, USD 0.35; the cheapest DRAM board 1,044 (872 to 1,251), 124 MH/s per board bandwidth-bound, USD 4.78; 95 percent of the board's energy is the memory path | waits on COHORT's card row (6.2x per uJ of card energy at a; 0.96x per uJ at the board) | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | CONTROLS: the pinned build and the equivalence contract by 15:00; COHORT's card rows 15:00 (the ratio follows within the hour) |
|
||||
| ctl-coop-arx | control and candidate | CONTROLS: the cooperative ARX kernel (lanes on one 256 B entry per fetch, every byte consumed, the arithmetic feeding the next address) plus the CPU reference, by 14:00 | target: the card's non-ARX energy share f at or under 14.8 percent (the screen R = 1 / ((1 - f) / 1.3 + f / 13)); spills, sync, generation and finalisation counted; ADVERSARY's parametric form: 64 coalesced 256 B fetches | NOT RUN (the card MODELLED by ADVERSARY: 35 nJ per coalesced read, 8.5 pJ per ARX instruction at the knee, both CLAIMED pending COHORT) | v1 (parametric, at 1.6 M ARX per hash, f 0.14): the board 1.35x (0.80 to 2.07) against the un-improved programmable core, 1.72x against the sized register file, 2.59x (1.94 to 3.41) against the fused add-rotate-xor lane, 3.19x a node ahead; a_same 5,024 (near-memory, fused) = 3.15x; USD 13 to 15 per MH/s against 15.7: the one control where the chip's hardware per MH/s approaches the card's | SCREEN only (the card modelled): 2.59x board same node on the fused lane, 3.19x ahead; the ranking turns on the measured ARX instruction cost (6.2 marginal to 11.8 pJ at the knee moves it 0.7x to 1.4x of nominal) | NOT RUN | NOT RUN (SCREEN) | CONTROLS 14:00; COHORT card rows (f, J per hash, stock and knee where a lock holds, 4090 and 5090) 15:00; ADVERSARY redesign on the measured rows 16:00; LAB reading 16:00 |
|
||||
| cand-x10 | candidate (the founder's third review, 11:5x UK; the scoped same-node board claim; interface section 8a) | SEARCH: the full-sector fold object exactly as reviewed (it enters the search system as a corner through the +labw weight table), CPU reference + CUDA kernel by 14:00, the kit and the trace 14:30 | 4 GiB dataset; dependent 32 B sector loads, every byte folded (32-bit MAD, XOR, shifts); 64 loads to start, the count set by the 10 percent joules budget on the locked 5090; 64-register window; a 32-lane shuffle every four ops; no mul64, division, wide permute or matmul; the 0.995 address-share floor; the verifier one warp under 10 ms | NOT RUN (the frozen denominator: locked 5090 and 5080, a 4090, one AMD card; v6 and X10 paired; COHORT's pair-mode harness ready for the kit at 14:30) | NOT RUN (ADVERSARY: the same-node board under the reviewer's model rule with the energy split, both conventions; the die and node-ahead as coexistence rows; priced on v1 within the hour of SEARCH's trace) | NOT RUN; the claim column is the board; the die and node-ahead beside it as coexistence | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | CONTROLS: the readwidth fact of record 12:30, the sector-read rows (with and without the full fold, 5090 and 4090, twin method) 14:00; SEARCH 14:00 and 14:30; ADVERSARY: the v6 split 13:30, the X10 board rows within an hour of the trace; COHORT: the X10 rows within an hour of the kit; LAB: the verdict line within an hour of the last row |
|
||||
| cand-01 to cand-10 (SEARCH batch 1) | candidates (the workload-search system) | SEARCH on build-9 (tools/lab/search on branch lab-search off 1p5x-int8, pid /srv/queue/pids/build-9-lab-search.pid): the first ten with census rows and ds28 packs (CPU reference, kernel.cu, SHA256SUMS) at build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/candidates/cand-NN/ with trace.json by 13:00 (a 20-minute slip on a parse fault at +arxr48+flat, absorbed) | the six knobs with explicit limits (verifier 10 ms proxy, dataset at or under 8 GiB, P03 at or under 5 percent, regs under 96, 16,384 to 340,000 instructions per unit); the best realisable region ARX-only, 48 to 64 reads, 170k to 225k instructions per unit | NOT RUN (the GPU self-test of the packs on a one-shot 4090 pod by 13:30; the top three to COHORT and ADVERSARY by 14:00 at ds30) | NOT RUN (priced on v1 within the hour of each trace.json) | SCREEN (SEARCH's cost model, calibrated on v0 and the measured 5090 knee and 4090 stock rows): the ARX-only region reads 1.72x at the 5090 knee against the board and 3.67x on the worst cell; every scattered design held by the die cell at the 3090 and 4090 stock rows (3.7x to 5.5x). RECALIBRATION OWED on v1 (the board 2.57x, the die a 353 nJ) | NOT RUN | SCREEN | SEARCH: packs and traces 13:00, the self-test 13:30, the top three 14:00; the +ilp<W> and +labw cuts building on build-9 |
|
||||
|
||||
## COHORT's denominator run on ctl-v6 (11:49 UK)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -21,22 +23,30 @@ Eight pods rented by id through the handover gate (two hosts per card: 5090 x2,
|
|||
5090 pod capped at 400 of 600 W and named so), the X7 kit's gen-6 worker f5f3846c, the x1-ctrl-ds30 pack (0x2a1d6caab4c24564) with
|
||||
its read-only twin (X7's twin, kernel 93a6a5ce, the address path kept by construction, twin_addr none accepted), three timed runs
|
||||
per pack per state interleaved, rows staged at build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/ctl-v6/<provider>-<pod>/ and linked under
|
||||
/srv/artefacts/lab/cohort/ctl-v6/<card>/; rows expected 12:1x to 12:3x UK. The AMD and Intel tiers BLOCKED: no RX 7600 to 9070 or
|
||||
Arc card on either provider (AMD there is MI300X and MI350X only), the house rigs unreachable by software; both tiers NOT RUN "no
|
||||
rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software" for every candidate (evidence build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/NOT-RUN-amd-intel.md);
|
||||
the hourly provider check retries (next 12:4x UK) and a card that appears is rented through the gate at once.
|
||||
/srv/artefacts/lab/cohort/ctl-v6/<card>/; at 12:1x the 5090s at pass 4 of 6, the 3090s at pass 2, the 5080b re-rented on a new
|
||||
host, the 4090b under a re-rent watcher; the pair-mode harness (control plus candidate in one session, the 10 percent budget and
|
||||
P03 lines per card) ready for the X10 kit. The AMD and Intel tiers BLOCKED: no RX 7600 to 9070 or Arc card on either provider (AMD
|
||||
there is MI300X and MI350X only), the house rigs unreachable by software; both tiers NOT RUN "no rented card; the house rigs
|
||||
unreachable by software" for every candidate (evidence build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/NOT-RUN-amd-intel.md); the hourly provider
|
||||
check retries and a card that appears is rented through the gate at once. Spend: about USD 3 for the set on a day at USD 732.
|
||||
|
||||
## Adversarial sets
|
||||
|
||||
| set | date | contents | candidates scored on it |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| v0 (the record) | 9 Oct, X0 amendment 5b and X5 | the placed 8-lane 18-family core (6.55 pJ per lane-op at N5), the GDDR7 board, the hybrids at 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, the N2 full-SRAM die, recomputation; X7's HBM3 and near-memory memory paths; X8's systolic int8 array | ctl-v6 (from the record only) |
|
||||
| v1 | pending (ADVERSARY) | v0 re-run on the frozen traces in the instruction convention at N5 and N3 with the design rows in the section 2 form; every improvement found appended with its stamp | all |
|
||||
| v0 (the record) | 9 Oct, X0 amendment 5b and X5 | the placed 8-lane 18-family core (6.55 pJ per lane-op at N5), the GDDR7 board, the hybrids at 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, the N2 full-SRAM die, recomputation; X7's HBM3 and near-memory memory paths; X8's systolic int8 array | ctl-v6 (the record: board 2.35x, die 7.8x); SEARCH's cost model (recalibration owed) |
|
||||
| v1 | 12:0x UK 9 Oct (ADVERSARY, commit 0344ec150 on class-v6-adversary; tools/1p5x/lab/adversary.py on build-4 under build-4-lab-adversary.pid; the JSONs scratchpad/lab/adv/<cand id>.json; pages docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/adv/<cand id>/README.md; the set and method lab/adv/README.md) | v0 plus: a bandwidth ceiling on every DRAM design (1.79 TB/s at 85 percent); a register file sized to the work (the floor lane's routed 8-register flop lanes in the complete machine); fused dependent operations (the tail 0.6 of the row CLAIMED until the routed arxf and arxf32 lanes land from the floor-k flow on build-4, about 12:4x); HBM3 at one and eight stacks and near-memory as complete machines with the sector arithmetic for 128 and 256 B bursts; recomputation priced from the Ethash-family generators; the die on as many reticles as the dataset needs. Calibration: v6 on the placed core plus GDDR7 reproduces X0 5b (1,706 vs 1,707 nJ, 2.35x) and the die (511 vs 513) | ctl-v6, ctl-progpow-094 (proxy), ctl-fishhash, ctl-coop-arx (parametric) |
|
||||
| v2 | opens when the routed fused lanes land (about 12:4x) | the routed arxf lanes replace the fused tail claim | every candidate re-scored |
|
||||
|
||||
## Rejections and regression hits
|
||||
|
||||
None yet.
|
||||
| when | source | what |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 12:1x UK | SEARCH, the first screen (4,000 draws, seed 1) | 1,762 int8 mixes by REG-04; 122 scattered-ARX designs at or under 32 reads by REG-05; 343 on the verification or granularity limits (F2); none measured, all SCREEN rejections |
|
||||
|
||||
## Faults
|
||||
|
||||
None yet.
|
||||
| when | source | what | state |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 11:49 UK | COHORT | no AMD (RX 7600 to 9070) or Intel Arc card rentable on either provider; the house rigs unreachable by software | the two tiers NOT RUN with the reason on every candidate; hourly retry |
|
||||
| 12:1x UK | SEARCH | a parse fault on +arxr48+flat in batch 1 | fixed in the cut building on build-9; a 20-minute slip on the 13:30 clock, absorbed inside it |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -20434,7 +20434,7 @@
|
|||
"plan_status": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
"run_id": "lab-20261009-01",
|
||||
"evidence_path": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T10:58:29.739Z",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T11:02:10.662Z",
|
||||
"evidence_record": {
|
||||
"requirement_id": "R15-01",
|
||||
"decision": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
|
|
@ -20455,8 +20455,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T10:58:29.739Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:02:10.662Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"evidence_records": {
|
||||
"lab:candidate": {
|
||||
|
|
@ -20479,8 +20479,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T10:58:29.739Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:02:10.662Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"in_progress_since": "2026-10-09T10:48:54.646Z",
|
||||
|
|
@ -21144,7 +21144,7 @@
|
|||
"plan_status": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
"run_id": "lab-20261009-01",
|
||||
"evidence_path": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T10:58:29.739Z",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T11:02:10.662Z",
|
||||
"evidence_record": {
|
||||
"requirement_id": "R15-08",
|
||||
"decision": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
|
|
@ -21165,8 +21165,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T10:58:29.739Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:02:10.662Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"evidence_records": {
|
||||
"lab:candidate": {
|
||||
|
|
@ -21189,8 +21189,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T10:58:29.739Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:02:10.662Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"in_progress_since": "2026-10-09T10:48:54.646Z",
|
||||
|
|
@ -21234,7 +21234,7 @@
|
|||
"plan_status": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
"run_id": "lab-20261009-01",
|
||||
"evidence_path": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T10:58:29.739Z",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T11:02:10.662Z",
|
||||
"evidence_record": {
|
||||
"requirement_id": "R15-09",
|
||||
"decision": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
|
|
@ -21255,8 +21255,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T10:58:29.739Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:02:10.662Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"evidence_records": {
|
||||
"lab:candidate": {
|
||||
|
|
@ -21279,8 +21279,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T10:58:29.739Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:02:10.662Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"in_progress_since": "2026-10-09T10:48:54.646Z",
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
|
|||
"in_progress": true,
|
||||
"method": "model",
|
||||
"evidence": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods.",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back.",
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue