Merge lab-20261009 a7dc07e7 into master (gate: green on a7dc07e7, recorded by tools/ci/pre-push.sh; landed on the build mirror)
This commit is contained in:
igneum-labs
commit
bb56bdc2ab
3 changed files with 18 additions and 18 deletions
|
|
@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ Energies in nJ per hash unless stated.
|
|||
|
||||
| id | kind | tree and packs | resource line | cohort rows (board power; wall BLOCKED on every rented pod) | adversary rows (adv-set v1, instruction convention, complete machine) | worst score (band) | coexistence (section 8b) | status | next move (owner, clock UK) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| ctl-v6 | control (frozen) | 1a938abe4; hl-v6-all 0x9d40978601a7df2a (fp 59e6708e46f1e87c); signing 2a1d6caab4c24564; l8off kit c20999d1, worker 218ca414; COHORT's set: the X7 kit's gen-6 worker f5f3846c, pack x1-ctrl-ds30 (0x2a1d6caab4c24564) | 4 GiB dataset, 256 reads per hash, W = 1 (4 B of a 64 B item; CONTROLS to confirm the readwidth fact of record by 12:30), 62,120 instructions (102,612 counted), state class, layer 8 ON | record: house 5090 knee 4,011 / stock 5,842 (report 05f00bd8, enclosure caveat); rented 5090 stock 6,470; rented 4090 stock 8,091 with twin 6,899 (f 0.853). IN FLIGHT (COHORT, from 11:49): 5090 x2, 4090 x2, 3090 x2, 5080 x2 rented pods, three timed runs per pack per state with the twin, rows 12:1x to 12:3x. AMD and Intel: NOT RUN "no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software" (hourly retry, next 12:4x) | v1 (ADVERSARY 12:0x, commit 0344ec150 on class-v6-adversary; the calibration reproduces X0 5b: 1,706 vs 1,707 nJ on the v0 board, the die 511 vs 513): a_same 353 (277 to 463; the N2 die with the sized and fused lane), a_ahead 286; the cheapest DRAM board 1,558 (fused lane) = 2.57x (2.04 to 3.00) same node, 2.68x a node ahead, USD 8.91 per MH/s against the card's 30.6; ProgPoW's premise column 1.01x to 1.02x (f 0.908). The fused tail (0.6 of the row) is CLAIMED until the routed arxf lanes land (about 12:4x) | on the 5090 knee numerator only: the board (the claim column) 2.57x (2.04 to 3.00) same node, 2.68x ahead; the die 11.4x (8.7 to 14.5) same, 14.0x ahead (coexistence rows). RE-RANK from v0: the board 2.35x to 2.57x (the shadow's 55,296 instructions fit an 8-register flop lane at 3.5 pJ instead of the 64-register SRAM-window core at 5.05). NOT the lab's score until the cohort rows are in | NOT RUN (ADVERSARY, due with the controls this afternoon) | NOT RUN (cohort in flight; adversary v1 in, the fused tail CLAIMED) | COHORT: the eight rows 12:3x; ADVERSARY: the routed fused lanes 12:4x, the coexistence table this afternoon; LAB: the worst-cohort score within an hour of the last row |
|
||||
| ctl-v6 | control (frozen) | 1a938abe4; hl-v6-all 0x9d40978601a7df2a (fp 59e6708e46f1e87c); signing 2a1d6caab4c24564; l8off kit c20999d1, worker 218ca414; COHORT's set: the X7 kit's gen-6 worker f5f3846c, pack x1-ctrl-ds30 (0x2a1d6caab4c24564) | 4 GiB dataset, 256 reads per hash, W = 1 (4 B of a 64 B item; CONTROLS to confirm the readwidth fact of record by 12:30), 62,120 instructions (102,612 counted), state class, layer 8 ON | record: house 5090 knee 4,011 / stock 5,842 (report 05f00bd8, enclosure caveat); rented 5090 stock 6,470; rented 4090 stock 8,091 with twin 6,899 (f 0.853). IN FLIGHT (COHORT, from 11:49): 5090 x2, 4090 x2, 3090 x2, 5080 x2 rented pods, three timed runs per pack per state with the twin, rows 12:1x to 12:3x. AMD and Intel: NOT RUN "no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software" (hourly retry, next 12:4x) | v1 (ADVERSARY 12:0x, commit 0344ec150 on class-v6-adversary; the calibration reproduces X0 5b: 1,706 vs 1,707 nJ on the v0 board, the die 511 vs 513): a_same 353 (277 to 463; the N2 die with the sized and fused lane), a_ahead 286; the cheapest DRAM board 1,558 (fused lane) = 2.57x (2.04 to 3.00) same node, 2.68x a node ahead, USD 8.91 per MH/s against the card's 30.6; ProgPoW's premise column 1.01x to 1.02x (f 0.908). The fused tail (0.6 of the row) is CLAIMED until the routed arxf lanes land (about 12:4x) | on the 5090 knee numerator only, set v2 (12:0x; the routed arxf lanes: 1.87 pJ per fused add-rotate-xor triple on an 8-register window, WITNESS): the board (the claim column) 2.60x (2.06 to 3.02) same node, 2.70x ahead, a = 1,543 nJ with the split memory 527 / ALU 167 / tax 849 (the chip's largest term is its tax: 35 W claimed static and controller at the activation-bound 68 MH/s plus PSU, VRM, cooling and host; a chip that lifts its rate dilutes it and the ratio RISES, so 2.60x is the chip's worst case); the card's split memory 3,642 / compute 369 / tax 0; ProgPoW's premise 1.01x to 1.02x; the die a_same 337 nJ = 11.9x (coexistence row). RE-RANK from v0: 2.35x to 2.60x. NOT the lab's score until the cohort rows are in | ctl-v6, set v2 (WITNESS; a 100,000-machine fleet, a 24-month straight-line life, design USD 35 M for the board chip and USD 300 M for the N2 die, the card sunk at USD 30.6 per MH/s on v6 at the knee, 15.7 of record beside it; scratchpad/lab/adv/ctl-v6-coexistence.json): the same-node board, edge 2.60x, chip capital USD 14.04 per MH/s (die 0.34, memory 5.42, board 3.15, design 5.13), GPU electricity-only 0.056 / 0.111 / 0.167 USD per TH at 0.05 / 0.10 / 0.15 per kWh against the chip's all-in 0.244 / 0.265 / 0.287: COEXISTENCE HOLDS at every price (4.4x / 2.4x / 1.7x), no fleet size breaks even at 0.10; the stored-half hybrid, edge 3.80x, USD 9.17: holds 2.9x / 1.6x / 1.1x; the N2 die, edge 11.9x, USD 1.59: PUSHED OUT at every price (0.5x / 0.3x / 0.2x) once the fleet passes 14,300 dies at 0.10; the node-ahead board, edge 2.70x: holds 4.4x / 2.4x / 1.7x. Reading: on v6 the GDDR7 board's capital per MH/s carries coexistence, not the energy ratio; only the reticle die at a fleet above 14,000 pushes the GPU owner out | NOT RUN (cohort in flight: the 4090b pod re-rented at 12:1x, the rest in their timed runs; adversary v2 in; CONTROLS pinned ctl-v6 at build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/controls/frozen-v6/ with sidecars and the 4090 self-tests PASS) | COHORT: the eight rows 12:3x; ADVERSARY: the routed fused lanes 12:4x, the coexistence table this afternoon; LAB: the worst-cohort score within an hour of the last row |
|
||||
| ctl-progpow-094 | control | CONTROLS to pin: the official ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference from source with its test vectors (kawpowminer master a proxy only); ADVERSARY's v1 rows use the KAWPOW census as the proxy until the pin | CONTROLS to state (its own equivalence contract before any number); 16 KB per hash of DRAM traffic (ADVERSARY) | NOT RUN (the record's 4090 stock row 6,920 used by ADVERSARY as the numerator) | v1 (proxy): a_same 526 (417 to 873; near-memory in HBM3 base dies, fused lane) = 13.2x (7.9 to 16.6) vs the 4090 at stock, a_ahead 447 = 15.5x, USD 4.95; the cheapest DRAM board 1,614 = 4.29x (3.50 to 5.22) same node, 4.51x ahead, USD 6.89 against 29.7; the board bandwidth-bound at 16 KB per hash (93 MH/s per board; the 11:3x conventions row corrected: 2,003 nJ at USD 6.89, 3.45x on the same core); recomputation from the 85 MB cache 60 to 80 uJ, never credible; ProgPoW's premise column 1.1x to 1.2x (no twin) | on the 4090 stock numerator, proxy: the board 4.29x (3.50 to 5.22) same, 4.51x ahead; the die 13.2x. NOT the lab's score: the pinned 0.9.4 build, the cohort rows and a twin pending | NOT RUN | NOT RUN (proxy rows only) | CONTROLS: the pinned build, the test vectors read back, the equivalence contract, by 15:00; COHORT rows 15:00 with a read-only twin for the premise column; ADVERSARY re-prices on the pinned object |
|
||||
| ctl-fishhash | control | CONTROLS to pin: Iron Fish's implemented GPU design (the reviewed version named by commit); ADVERSARY read cpp/FishHash.cpp | 32 iterations x 3 fetches of 128 B = 96 random reads over a fixed 4.83 GB dataset, about 9,400 lane-instructions of 64-bit multiply-add and FNV (ADVERSARY's read) | NOT RUN (COHORT's card row owed) | v1: a_same 162 (128 to 225; three N2 reticles, fused lane), a_ahead 155, USD 0.35; the cheapest DRAM board 1,044 (872 to 1,251), 124 MH/s per board bandwidth-bound, USD 4.78; 95 percent of the board's energy is the memory path | waits on COHORT's card row (6.2x per uJ of card energy at a; 0.96x per uJ at the board) | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | CONTROLS: the pinned build and the equivalence contract by 15:00; COHORT's card rows 15:00 (the ratio follows within the hour) |
|
||||
| ctl-coop-arx | control and candidate | CONTROLS: the cooperative ARX kernel (lanes on one 256 B entry per fetch, every byte consumed, the arithmetic feeding the next address) plus the CPU reference, by 14:00 | target: the card's non-ARX energy share f at or under 14.8 percent (the screen R = 1 / ((1 - f) / 1.3 + f / 13)); spills, sync, generation and finalisation counted; ADVERSARY's parametric form: 64 coalesced 256 B fetches | NOT RUN (the card MODELLED by ADVERSARY: 35 nJ per coalesced read, 8.5 pJ per ARX instruction at the knee, both CLAIMED pending COHORT) | v1 (parametric, at 1.6 M ARX per hash, f 0.14): the board 1.35x (0.80 to 2.07) against the un-improved programmable core, 1.72x against the sized register file, 2.59x (1.94 to 3.41) against the fused add-rotate-xor lane, 3.19x a node ahead; a_same 5,024 (near-memory, fused) = 3.15x; USD 13 to 15 per MH/s against 15.7: the one control where the chip's hardware per MH/s approaches the card's | SCREEN only (the card modelled): 2.59x board same node on the fused lane, 3.19x ahead; the ranking turns on the measured ARX instruction cost (6.2 marginal to 11.8 pJ at the knee moves it 0.7x to 1.4x of nominal) | NOT RUN | NOT RUN (SCREEN) | CONTROLS 14:00; COHORT card rows (f, J per hash, stock and knee where a lock holds, 4090 and 5090) 15:00; ADVERSARY redesign on the measured rows 16:00; LAB reading 16:00 |
|
||||
| cand-x10 | candidate (the founder's third review, 11:5x UK; the scoped same-node board claim; interface section 8a) | SEARCH: the full-sector fold object exactly as reviewed (it enters the search system as a corner through the +labw weight table), CPU reference + CUDA kernel by 14:00, the kit and the trace 14:30 | 4 GiB dataset; dependent 32 B sector loads, every byte folded (32-bit MAD, XOR, shifts); 64 loads to start, the count set by the 10 percent joules budget on the locked 5090; 64-register window; a 32-lane shuffle every four ops; no mul64, division, wide permute or matmul; the 0.995 address-share floor; the verifier one warp under 10 ms | NOT RUN (the frozen denominator: locked 5090 and 5080, a 4090, one AMD card; v6 and X10 paired; COHORT's pair-mode harness ready for the kit at 14:30) | NOT RUN (ADVERSARY: the same-node board under the reviewer's model rule with the energy split, both conventions; the die and node-ahead as coexistence rows; priced on v1 within the hour of SEARCH's trace) | NOT RUN; the claim column is the board; the die and node-ahead beside it as coexistence | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | CONTROLS: the readwidth fact of record 12:30, the sector-read rows (with and without the full fold, 5090 and 4090, twin method) 14:00; SEARCH 14:00 and 14:30; ADVERSARY: the v6 split 13:30, the X10 board rows within an hour of the trace; COHORT: the X10 rows within an hour of the kit; LAB: the verdict line within an hour of the last row |
|
||||
| cand-x10 | candidate (the founder's third review, 11:5x UK; the scoped same-node board claim; interface section 8a) | SEARCH: the full-sector fold object exactly as reviewed (it enters the search system as a corner through the +labw weight table), CPU reference + CUDA kernel by 14:00, the kit and the trace 14:30 | 4 GiB dataset; dependent 32 B sector loads, every byte folded (32-bit MAD, XOR, shifts); 64 loads to start, the count set by the 10 percent joules budget on the locked 5090; 64-register window; a 32-lane shuffle every four ops; no mul64, division, wide permute or matmul; the 0.995 address-share floor; the verifier one warp under 10 ms | NOT RUN (the frozen denominator: locked 5090 and 5080, a 4090, one AMD card; v6 and X10 paired; COHORT's pair-mode harness ready for the kit at 14:30) | set v2 pre-pricing with the CARD MODELLED (ADVERSARY 12:0x; COHORT's X10 row replaces the card side): cand-x10-sector (118 dependent fully folded 32 B loads per lane-hash; the card modelled at 1,900 nJ, memory-bound: 118 x 14 nJ all-in plus 8,500 instructions at 5.9 to 11.8 pJ plus the floor share): the same-node board 634 nJ (553 to 798) = 3.00x (2.38 to 3.44), 3.03x ahead; the split chip memory 243 / fold 22 / tax 369 against the card's 1,650 / 70 / 180; the fold gap 1.2x to 3.9x by core; the die 73 nJ (26x) and node-ahead as coexistence rows. X10 at 130k / 260k / 520k ALU with the card = v6 by the reviewer's construction: the board 4.67x / 2.89x / 1.63x (1.27 to 2.06) same node, 5.52x / 3.56x / 2.08x ahead | SCREEN: the board 3.00x at 118 loads, 1.63x (1.27 to 2.06) only at 520k ALU, with the card modelled; the lab's verdict line waits on COHORT's measured X10 row (the measurement settles it, not the model). ADVERSARY's reading: folding every byte does not move the board under 1.5x; the fold is 3 to 4 percent of either side; the memory path decides (X7) | set v2 at USD 0.10 (card modelled): the board holds 2.2x; the die pushed out above 5,800 dies | SCREEN | CONTROLS: the readwidth fact of record 12:30, the sector-read rows (with and without the full fold, 5090 and 4090, twin method) 14:00; SEARCH 14:00 and 14:30; ADVERSARY: the v6 split 13:30, the X10 board rows within an hour of the trace; COHORT: the X10 rows within an hour of the kit; LAB: the verdict line within an hour of the last row |
|
||||
| cand-01 to cand-10 (SEARCH batch 1) | candidates (the workload-search system) | SEARCH on build-9 (tools/lab/search on branch lab-search off 1p5x-int8, pid /srv/queue/pids/build-9-lab-search.pid): the first ten with census rows and ds28 packs (CPU reference, kernel.cu, SHA256SUMS) at build-1:/srv/artefacts/lab/candidates/cand-NN/ with trace.json by 13:00 (a 20-minute slip on a parse fault at +arxr48+flat, absorbed) | the six knobs with explicit limits (verifier 10 ms proxy, dataset at or under 8 GiB, P03 at or under 5 percent, regs under 96, 16,384 to 340,000 instructions per unit); the best realisable region ARX-only, 48 to 64 reads, 170k to 225k instructions per unit | NOT RUN (the GPU self-test of the packs on a one-shot 4090 pod by 13:30; the top three to COHORT and ADVERSARY by 14:00 at ds30) | NOT RUN (priced on v1 within the hour of each trace.json) | SCREEN (SEARCH's cost model, calibrated on v0 and the measured 5090 knee and 4090 stock rows): the ARX-only region reads 1.72x at the 5090 knee against the board and 3.67x on the worst cell; every scattered design held by the die cell at the 3090 and 4090 stock rows (3.7x to 5.5x). RECALIBRATION OWED on v1 (the board 2.57x, the die a 353 nJ) | NOT RUN | SCREEN | SEARCH: packs and traces 13:00, the self-test 13:30, the top three 14:00; the +ilp<W> and +labw cuts building on build-9 |
|
||||
|
||||
## COHORT's denominator run on ctl-v6 (11:49 UK)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -20434,7 +20434,7 @@
|
|||
"plan_status": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
"run_id": "lab-20261009-01",
|
||||
"evidence_path": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T11:09:07.092Z",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T11:18:34.435Z",
|
||||
"evidence_record": {
|
||||
"requirement_id": "R15-01",
|
||||
"decision": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
|
|
@ -20455,8 +20455,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:09:07.092Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:18:34.435Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"evidence_records": {
|
||||
"lab:candidate": {
|
||||
|
|
@ -20479,8 +20479,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:09:07.092Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:18:34.435Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"in_progress_since": "2026-10-09T10:48:54.646Z",
|
||||
|
|
@ -21144,7 +21144,7 @@
|
|||
"plan_status": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
"run_id": "lab-20261009-01",
|
||||
"evidence_path": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T11:09:07.092Z",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T11:18:34.435Z",
|
||||
"evidence_record": {
|
||||
"requirement_id": "R15-08",
|
||||
"decision": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
|
|
@ -21165,8 +21165,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:09:07.092Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:18:34.435Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"evidence_records": {
|
||||
"lab:candidate": {
|
||||
|
|
@ -21189,8 +21189,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:09:07.092Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:18:34.435Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"in_progress_since": "2026-10-09T10:48:54.646Z",
|
||||
|
|
@ -21234,7 +21234,7 @@
|
|||
"plan_status": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
"run_id": "lab-20261009-01",
|
||||
"evidence_path": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T11:09:07.092Z",
|
||||
"updated": "2026-10-09T11:18:34.435Z",
|
||||
"evidence_record": {
|
||||
"requirement_id": "R15-09",
|
||||
"decision": "NOT RUN",
|
||||
|
|
@ -21255,8 +21255,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:09:07.092Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:18:34.435Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"evidence_records": {
|
||||
"lab:candidate": {
|
||||
|
|
@ -21279,8 +21279,8 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none",
|
||||
"reviewer": "",
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:09:07.092Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
"at": "2026-10-09T11:18:34.435Z",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs. | The 1.5x adversarial comparison laboratory (the founder's order, 9 October 2026, 11:4x UK): one evaluation for every control and candidate (the measurement recipe with the read-only twin for the memory share, the adversary interface returning the lowest credible specialist energy per design as a complete machine with WITNESS or BOUND labels, the score as the worst comparison over the required cohort same node and one node ahead, the rejection filters F1 to F6, the regression set REG-01 to REG-08 from the 8 and 9 October failures). Every row NOT RUN until the panel reads it; the first measured score (the frozen v6 control on the cohort against adversarial set v1) lands as a later batch under this cell. Amended 11:5x UK: X10, the full-sector fold candidate of the founder's third review, added as cand-x10 with the scoped same-node board claim (the die and node-ahead chips as coexistence rows); the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN on every candidate (no rented card; the house rigs unreachable by software) until a card is found."
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"in_progress_since": "2026-10-09T10:48:54.646Z",
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
|
|||
"in_progress": true,
|
||||
"method": "model",
|
||||
"evidence": "docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/README.md; docs/analysis/class-v6/1p5x/lab/table.md",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back.",
|
||||
"note": "The lab's interface and the candidate table at the fan-out: the frozen v6 control carried from the record (the house 5090 at its knee 4,011 nJ per hash, board power; the X0 amendment 5b rows: the DRAM board 2.35x same node WITNESS, the N2 die 7.8x the worst credible), the cohort rows for the 3090, the 5080 and the AMD and Intel tiers NOT RUN, adversarial set v1 pending; the three other controls (ProgPoW 0.9.4 reference, FishHash, the cooperative ARX candidate) NOT RUN with their clocks. No score is the lab's until the cohort and the adversary rows are in; R15-01, R15-08 and R15-09 stay NOT RUN until read. X10 (cand-x10) joins the table NOT RUN with its per-lane assignments and clocks; COHORT's ctl-v6 denominator set is in flight on eight rented pods. 12:1x UK: adversarial set v1 on the table (the frozen v6's same-node board 2.57x, 2.04 to 3.00, the fused tail CLAIMED until the routed lanes land; the die 11.4x as a coexistence row); the coexistence table (interface section 8b) added as the scoreboard's headline; SEARCH's first screen recorded as SCREEN rejections. Still NOT RUN: no cohort score until COHORT's eight rows are read back. 12:2x UK: set v2 (the routed fused-ARX lanes) makes the v6 board 2.60x a WITNESS; the ctl-v6 coexistence table (the board holds at every price; the N2 die pushes the GPU owner out above 14,300 dies at USD 0.10) is the headline; X10 SCREEN with the card modelled (the board 3.00x at 118 loads). Still NOT RUN: the cohort rows in their timed runs.",
|
||||
"claim_impact": "none"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue