From ca5151eef548acaf8b2797235c7a2dbb996aabb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: igneum-labs <337424239+igneum-labs@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 08:33:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Evidence row 17: the in-house pass's floor reading beside its sentence (nine of nine hot sets refused; the diffuse era-stride excess, bounded under 0.1 percent of a hash's reads per site, is not caught by the floor and is the next class's test; measured 8 October 2026, ledger AP-F8-1 and AP-F8-6); /evidence rebuilt Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 --- docs/evidence.md | 2 +- site/evidence.html | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/evidence.md b/docs/evidence.md index ad97ccc46..217c84dca 100644 --- a/docs/evidence.md +++ b/docs/evidence.md @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Versions in the table: `igneum-pow` is the Rust crate at `igneum-pow/Cargo.toml` | 14 | Ethereum bytecode runs unchanged, with the documented differences of spec 7.1 | Homepage Build card; litepaper Building | tested by the team | as row 13; fixes `F-exec-A`, `F-exec-B` (spec 7.5) | `tools/evm-smoke/smoke.mjs`: deploy via viem, `increment`, `hashLoop`, `eth_estimateGas`, `eth_getLogs`; `tools/exec-attacks` scenarios 1 and 3; bench-log "execution layer attack fixes" | Deployment, calls, reverts, logs and gas estimates behave as viem expects; chain id 4463; the prototype pgas table gives 0.0095 to 0.028 pgas per gas, below the design's band before calibration, 3 October 2026. 4 October 2026: a transaction that would cross the block's proving budget is refused by the mempool and, if forced in, aborted and charged with its nonce advanced (25 of 25 checks; 30 of 30 malformed cases). Apple M5 Max. The `Prover` precompile, proof records and the shard planner are not in the node | none yet | | 15 | Every block is proven, with the proof landing within about a minute at launch | Homepage stats ("~60 s to a proof"); litepaper Proving; roadmap phase 3 gate | implemented | repo `d7e1f89` (GPU proof), `e01a3cc`, `292e800`, `eedd136` (`proving/igneum-prove`: shard cutter, MPT witnesses, shard and aggregator guests); SP1 6.8.1; spec 7.2, 7.6 | `proving/windows-wsl2` (SETUP-PROVER, PROVE-BLOCK) on the RTX 5090; `igneum-prove-host --mode block` on `proving/fixtures/`; bench-log "proving v0 on the RTX 5090" and "proving: devnet v4 shards" | First GPU proof of an Igneum block, 4 October 2026, RTX 5090 (WSL2, SP1 cuda, mining paused): fixture `block-78-increment` (2 transactions), core proof 1.4 s (7.3 MB, verify 0.221 s), compressed proof 2.7 s (1.27 MB, verify 0.038 s), post-state and receipts roots identical to the node's; 15.7x and 20.6x faster than a loaded M5 Max CPU. The same day on that CPU (load 38 to 47): a three-shard block proved shard by shard and aggregated by recursion, 19 min (1,139 s) end to end, 245 to 337 s per compressed shard proof, every proof verified. What is not there: no proof is produced, carried or checked on the chain (the devnet prover is a stub that signs claims), the proving pool pays nobody (row 21), the block proven is far below one shard, and the 60-second figure remains a design target; the pass mark is the standard in `docs/benchmarks/proving-e2e.md`. Second RTX 5090 run, 4 October 2026 evening (job run-20261004-173115): a full shard at the provisional S_p (6.75 M pgas, 60.8 M cycles) executed in 1.63 s, core proof 8.3 s (18.1 MB), compressed proof 10.9 s (1.27 MB, verify 0.040 s); a two-shard block (13.5 M pgas) proved shard by shard (11.7 s and 10.0 s) and aggregated in 2.2 s, 24 s of GPU stages end to end, every proof verified, six tampered witnesses rejected. The two host defects (an abort after the upload, an idle wait that turned out to be an unbuffered 18 MB proof save through the WSL2 file bridge, 24 minutes) are fixed (ledger P20) 5 October 2026, live devnet with real transactions (bench-log "real transactions, the first non-empty shard proven and paid"): block 72704 shard 0, 29 transfers, 5,800 pgas, proven on PC 2 in 34 s, verified on the Mac in 0.297 s and paid 1.7623 IGN, 53 s after the chain block executed; of about 1,400 blocks in the 20-minute window 36 were proven (the one prover takes the newest shard assigned to it), so "every block" is not yet true; a second content shard (72803, all copies skipped) failed the native-execution veto on the exporter's block structure, fixed with fixtures the same day, the node side pending the 0.3.9 rollout 5 October 2026, evening (bench-log "proving v1"): the aggregated segment record, the chain rule and the unproven rule are implemented behind `proving_v1_activation_daa` (branch proving-v1, not on the devnet before 0.3.11); on the RTX 5090 a chain of 8 consecutive live blocks proved and aggregated by recursion in 135.6 s with the miner on the card (17 s a block, one proof of 1,272,909 bytes attesting all 8, verified in 0.04 s); the 3-node fast-time harness paid a segment record 1.0 s after submission and refused a late one after its deadline (21 checks); the devnet itself, with one prover, carried proofs for 2.4% of blocks over 30 minutes at a block-to-record latency p50 44 s, p99 52 s. The "within about a minute" holds per proven block; "every block" needs 18 mining 5090s or 6 proving-only cards at empty blocks on the measured rates, and the mandatory rule stays off until the share is one | none yet | | 16 | A 12 GB card proves one shard in about 20 s (WITHDRAWN 5 October 2026: a 24 GB card proves a full shard at the adopted size in 4.3 s; 32 GB mines and proves) | Litepaper Proving ("The proving budget"); roadmap gate 2 | designed | spec 5.1 (Target), 7.6 (`S_p` provisional, 7,500,000 pgas = `B_p` / 4) | `PROVE-SHARD.bat` on the RTX 5090 (pending); the end-to-end standard in `docs/benchmarks/proving-e2e.md`; bench-log "proving: devnet v4 shards" | Measured on a 32 GB card, not yet on a 12 GB card. A shard at the provisional `S_p` is 60.8 M SP1 cycles on the prototype pgas table (9 cycles per pgas, 44 per EVM gas; the modexp entry about 100x its SP1 cost); on an RTX 5090 (4 October 2026 evening, job run-20261004-173115) it executed in 1.63 s and its compressed proof took 10.9 s, verified in 0.040 s, so the 32 GB card is inside the 20 s target with margin. Whether a 12 GB card proves it at all, and in what time, is the next measurement (an RTX 3060 and an RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB are on order). A per-shard time can be met by shrinking the shard, so the project does not use it as a pass mark 5 October 2026, evening (bench-log "proving v1", the S_p curve): measured on the RTX 5090 with SP1 6.8.1's GPU prover, the card to itself, 1-s nvidia-smi samples: an empty shard 13,874 MiB and 2.2 s; a full shard at the ADOPTED v1 budget (30,000 pgas, 4.7 M cycles) 20,434 MiB and 4.3 s; the full prototype shard (6.75 M pgas, 60 M cycles) 28,307 MiB and 10.8 s; beside the miner 15,670 and 30,039 MiB. No environment knob of SP1 moves the 13.9 GB floor and the GPU server has no options of its own, so on this build a 12 GB card proves nothing, a 16 GB card only empty shards, a 24 GB card the adopted full shard alone and beside the miner (22,210 MiB and 13.2 s, measured on the 32 GB card: the 5090's allocation pattern, not yet a run on a 24 GB card) and a 32 GB card the prototype shard beside the miner with 2.5 GB spare. The litepaper line now says so; the 12 GB gate returns when a prover build with a smaller floor is measured on a 12 GB card | none yet | -| 17 | The chip resistance claim: at launch the strongest chip in the public model reaches 2.1x (a core as good as a GPU lane, k = 1) to 3.4x (a core three times better, k about 0.33) per joule against an RTX 5090 under class v4, live from genesis on the testnet and the mainnet; the ladder's second rung brings it to about 2.8x; class v5 makes the dataset the chain's state so a stateless or stale chip is wrong on every item; the hot-set cache is bounded at 1.067x at the ceiling and the weak-day FPGA at 12 percent on 15 days a century, both routed to the next class; datacentre silicon does not change the question; a stored-dataset chip pays for itself only at about USD 100 M of market cap in two years; without class v4 the same chip would reach 5x to 9x (the class v3 baseline, the devnet's starting state, never the launch state) | the home page's chip line, the litepaper's chip section (/litepaper#chip-model), the miner page's line | tested by the team (every card, the verifier, the two attack-pass bounds, the H100), the chip itself modelled, class v5 and the ladder designed, the X9 figure claimed against a CPU core and never measured | `docs/analysis/chip-model-v3.md` 5 and 6; `docs/analysis/latency-shadow-2026-10-06.md`; `docs/plans/counter-asic-3-status.md`; `docs/analysis/attack-pass/f8-uniform.md`, `f4-weakday.md`, `docs/analysis/ca3-v4-uniform.md`; `docs/design/class-v5-stored-state.md`; the H100 and market-cap rows of 7 October; `docs/plans/cryptanalysis/in-house-pass.md` (the internal adversarial pass) | the chip model's arithmetic in its file; the card rows by the benchmark package; the attack-pass harnesses `tools/attack/f8-uniform` and the F4 census; the verifier by `igneum-pow bench` | 136 MH/s at 350 W (5090, bench) and 290 W (app); the class v4 efficiency passes (bench log "7 to 8 October 2026, the class v4 efficiency passes: the core clock lock on the RTX 5090 and the RTX 5080", measured): the 5090 at 136.84 MH/s and 475.5 W unlocked, 134.98 at 316.3 W at a 1,400 MHz core lock, the best points class v4 at 1,200 MHz (133.80 MH/s, 305.1 W, 0.439 MH/W) and class v3 at 1,300 MHz (134.62, 223.3 W, 0.603), the premium 145 W unlocked and 82 W at the best points, the knee 1,300 MHz; the RTX 5080 (8 October 2026, the dock card of the three-card Windows rig) at 71.41 MH/s and 253.1 W unlocked under class v4 against 71.28 at 169.7 W under class v3, the best points class v4 at 1,100 MHz (71.20 MH/s, 146.6 W, 0.486 MH/W) and class v3 at 1,000 MHz (71.11, 103.7 W, 0.686), the premium 83.4 W unlocked and 41 W at the best points, the knee between 1,000 and 900 MHz; per tier: a 5080 owner on class v4 locked near 1,100 MHz pays 147 W instead of 253 for 0.3 percent less rate, MH per watt up 72 percent, the lever Ember Tune's core-clock knob in 0.3.24; 27 MH/s at 21 W (M5 Max); 249 MH/s (H100 SXM) at 98 percent of its read ceiling, 1.78x hash, 1.15x MH/W, a third per rented dollar; 2.33 ms per warp; 2.1x, 3.4x, 2.8x at launch; the shadow's premium on a 5090 81.8 W at its knee (class v4 at the 1,200 MHz lock 133.80 MH/s at 305.1 W; class v3 at 1,300 MHz 134.62 at 223.3 W; 7 October 2026); 1.067x at the ceiling; 12 percent on 15 days a century; 10.85 ms at rung 3; USD 100 M; 5.1x to 9.2x the class v3 baseline; 6 and 7 October 2026, the M5 Max, PC 2's RTX 5090, PC 1's RX 9070 XT and RTX 4070, a rented H100 SXM, igneum-build-1 The k about 0.33 bound is the implied core of Bitmain's Antminer X9 (RandomX; 1,000 KH/s, 2,472 W, 2.47 J per KH, USD 5,600; pre-orders 26 December 2025), withdrawn in mid-May 2026 with buyers refunded before any unit shipped, no independent benchmark, commodity Sophgo SG2044 server SoCs with an AES accelerator, no tapeout: a claimed, unmeasured figure carried as the pessimistic bound, not a calibration point (attack pass AP-F5-1, 7 October 2026). | none yet; the next test is the internal adversarial pass (three lanes new to the hash code, outsider inputs only, reports published whole), and no outside review has run yet | +| 17 | The chip resistance claim: at launch the strongest chip in the public model reaches 2.1x (a core as good as a GPU lane, k = 1) to 3.4x (a core three times better, k about 0.33) per joule against an RTX 5090 under class v4, live from genesis on the testnet and the mainnet; the ladder's second rung brings it to about 2.8x; class v5 makes the dataset the chain's state so a stateless or stale chip is wrong on every item; the hot-set cache is bounded at 1.067x at the ceiling and the weak-day FPGA at 12 percent on 15 days a century, both routed to the next class; datacentre silicon does not change the question; a stored-dataset chip pays for itself only at about USD 100 M of market cap in two years; without class v4 the same chip would reach 5x to 9x (the class v3 baseline, the devnet's starting state, never the launch state) | the home page's chip line, the litepaper's chip section (/litepaper#chip-model), the miner page's line | tested by the team (every card, the verifier, the two attack-pass bounds, the H100), the chip itself modelled, class v5 and the ladder designed, the X9 figure claimed against a CPU core and never measured | `docs/analysis/chip-model-v3.md` 5 and 6; `docs/analysis/latency-shadow-2026-10-06.md`; `docs/plans/counter-asic-3-status.md`; `docs/analysis/attack-pass/f8-uniform.md`, `f4-weakday.md`, `docs/analysis/ca3-v4-uniform.md`; `docs/design/class-v5-stored-state.md`; the H100 and market-cap rows of 7 October; `docs/plans/cryptanalysis/in-house-pass.md` (the internal adversarial pass) | the chip model's arithmetic in its file; the card rows by the benchmark package; the attack-pass harnesses `tools/attack/f8-uniform` and the F4 census; the verifier by `igneum-pow bench` | 136 MH/s at 350 W (5090, bench) and 290 W (app); the class v4 efficiency passes (bench log "7 to 8 October 2026, the class v4 efficiency passes: the core clock lock on the RTX 5090 and the RTX 5080", measured): the 5090 at 136.84 MH/s and 475.5 W unlocked, 134.98 at 316.3 W at a 1,400 MHz core lock, the best points class v4 at 1,200 MHz (133.80 MH/s, 305.1 W, 0.439 MH/W) and class v3 at 1,300 MHz (134.62, 223.3 W, 0.603), the premium 145 W unlocked and 82 W at the best points, the knee 1,300 MHz; the RTX 5080 (8 October 2026, the dock card of the three-card Windows rig) at 71.41 MH/s and 253.1 W unlocked under class v4 against 71.28 at 169.7 W under class v3, the best points class v4 at 1,100 MHz (71.20 MH/s, 146.6 W, 0.486 MH/W) and class v3 at 1,000 MHz (71.11, 103.7 W, 0.686), the premium 83.4 W unlocked and 41 W at the best points, the knee between 1,000 and 900 MHz; per tier: a 5080 owner on class v4 locked near 1,100 MHz pays 147 W instead of 253 for 0.3 percent less rate, MH per watt up 72 percent, the lever Ember Tune's core-clock knob in 0.3.24; 27 MH/s at 21 W (M5 Max); 249 MH/s (H100 SXM) at 98 percent of its read ceiling, 1.78x hash, 1.15x MH/W, a third per rented dollar; 2.33 ms per warp; 2.1x, 3.4x, 2.8x at launch; the shadow's premium on a 5090 81.8 W at its knee (class v4 at the 1,200 MHz lock 133.80 MH/s at 305.1 W; class v3 at 1,300 MHz 134.62 at 223.3 W; 7 October 2026); 1.067x at the ceiling; 12 percent on 15 days a century; 10.85 ms at rung 3; USD 100 M; 5.1x to 9.2x the class v3 baseline; 6 and 7 October 2026, the M5 Max, PC 2's RTX 5090, PC 1's RX 9070 XT and RTX 4070, a rented H100 SXM, igneum-build-1 The k about 0.33 bound is the implied core of Bitmain's Antminer X9 (RandomX; 1,000 KH/s, 2,472 W, 2.47 J per KH, USD 5,600; pre-orders 26 December 2025), withdrawn in mid-May 2026 with buyers refunded before any unit shipped, no independent benchmark, commodity Sophgo SG2044 server SoCs with an AES accelerator, no tapeout: a claimed, unmeasured figure carried as the pessimistic bound, not a calibration point (attack pass AP-F5-1, 7 October 2026). | none yet; the next test is the internal adversarial pass (three lanes new to the hash code, outsider inputs only, reports published whole), whose floor reading is in (measured, 8 October 2026; ledger AP-F8-1 and AP-F8-6): nine of nine hot sets refused; the diffuse era-stride excess, bounded under 0.1 percent of a hash's reads per site, is not caught by the floor and is the next class's test, and no outside review has run yet | | 18 | The chip resistance measurements: the program is latency-bound (random reads), not bandwidth-bound, on every card we own, and sits beyond a card's on-chip cache | Litepaper Mining ("waits on memory latency, not on maths or bandwidth"), vs RandomX; the numbers page | tested by the team | readwidth e752fc7 (`docs/plans/read-width.md`), ca2-era 78c0ee4, ca2-cache 2de19e5 (`docs/plans/hot-table.md`) | The dependent-read probes at 32 to 1,024 MiB and the hash rate per class on the three cards; the latency-bound share = rate over the probe ceiling per load | Latency-bound share at the 1 GiB dataset: RTX 5090 0.96 (v2) and 1.01 (v3), RX 9070 XT 0.87 and 0.95, M5 Max 1.01 and 1.06; wider reads do not close the AMD gap (the 9070 XT does 2.4 G dependent reads per second at every width; the 5090 goes bandwidth-bound at 64 B, share 0.58); a 32 to 96 MiB hot table is not kept resident by any card while the dataset streams (g 0.80 to 0.87 in the added form). 5 October 2026 | none yet | | 19 | The lottery hash is sound as a hash: uniform output, deterministic, no out-of-bounds read, fuzzed; class v3 bit-exact on the three vendors | Litepaper vs RandomX ("Every number above is measured and logged"), the numbers page | tested by the team | ca2-mixer 1ab8b21 (`tests/mixer.rs`, `tests/scratch.rs`), ca2-era 78c0ee4, ca2-soundness a465881 (`docs/analysis/scratch-soundness.md`), `igneum-pow/tests/packs.rs` | The crate suite (53 + 4 + 19 + 7), the Metal fuzz, edge, stats and determinism runs on the v3 construction, the pack vectors and 2^24 fingerprints on Metal, Apple OpenCL, the RTX 5090 and the RX 9070 XT, the 1,024-hash CPU re-check per card | Class v3 (mixer x8 + era): 200-program fuzz 200 of 200 on Metal, every tenth on Apple OpenCL; the pinned v3 packs 3/3 + 3/3 and 96 of 96 lanes on Metal and Apple OpenCL; the six era packs' fingerprints equal on the three vendors (PC 1 job run-ca2-era-pc1-20261005, 5 October 2026); the v2 exports byte-identical on the v3 crate; the final-class PC rows and the G2 re-check: job run-ca2-era-pc1b-20261005 (pending at the time of writing) | none yet | | 20 | No premine, no pre-sale, no allocation: every coin is minted by the schedule and every coin goes to the block producer (80%) and the proving pool (20%) | Homepage stats and Economics tiles; litepaper Supply, Economics | implemented | repo `6ac80a3`; fork "igneum-node devnet v0"; `consensus/core/src/igneum.rs`, `coinbase.rs` | `cargo test -p kaspa-consensus-core igneum` (8 pass: subsidy table, ramp, split, cap) and `cargo test -p kaspa-consensus coinbase` (8 pass); `igneum-miner inspect 40`; bench-log "igneum-node devnet v0" | Coinbases on the devnet: 80/20 exact on 39 of 39 single-payee blocks, the 20% to the `igneum-proving-pool-v0` output; the per-second schedule sums to under the 4,000,000,000 cap by less than 100 coins; 3,168,808,781 units per DAA second in years 0 to 2, halving at 63,115,200 DAA s. 3 October 2026, Apple M5 Max. The devnet genesis carries no allocation; the mainnet genesis does not exist yet, so the claim is about the code and the stated rule, not a launch that has happened | none yet | diff --git a/site/evidence.html b/site/evidence.html index 7755ccf2d..391c2479c 100644 --- a/site/evidence.html +++ b/site/evidence.html @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ td.mono{font-family:var(--f-mono);font-size:12.5px;min-width:180px}td.iv{color:v 14Ethereum bytecode runs unchanged, with the documented differences of spec 7.1
Homepage Build card; litepaper Building
tested by the teamas row 13; fixes F-exec-A, F-exec-B (spec 7.5)tools/evm-smoke/smoke.mjs: deploy via viem, increment, hashLoop, eth_estimateGas, eth_getLogs; tools/exec-attacks scenarios 1 and 3; bench-log "execution layer attack fixes"Deployment, calls, reverts, logs and gas estimates behave as viem expects; chain id 4463; the prototype pgas table gives 0.0095 to 0.028 pgas per gas, below the design's band before calibration, 3 October 2026. 4 October 2026: a transaction that would cross the block's proving budget is refused by the mempool and, if forced in, aborted and charged with its nonce advanced (25 of 25 checks; 30 of 30 malformed cases). Apple M5 Max. The Prover precompile, proof records and the shard planner are not in the nodenone yet 15Every block is proven, with the proof landing within about a minute at launch
Homepage stats ("~60 s to a proof"); litepaper Proving; roadmap phase 3 gate
implementedrepo d7e1f89 (GPU proof), e01a3cc, 292e800, eedd136 (proving/igneum-prove: shard cutter, MPT witnesses, shard and aggregator guests); SP1 6.8.1; spec 7.2, 7.6proving/windows-wsl2 (SETUP-PROVER, PROVE-BLOCK) on the RTX 5090; igneum-prove-host --mode block on proving/fixtures/; bench-log "proving v0 on the RTX 5090" and "proving: devnet v4 shards"First GPU proof of an Igneum block, 4 October 2026, RTX 5090 (WSL2, SP1 cuda, mining paused): fixture block-78-increment (2 transactions), core proof 1.4 s (7.3 MB, verify 0.221 s), compressed proof 2.7 s (1.27 MB, verify 0.038 s), post-state and receipts roots identical to the node's; 15.7x and 20.6x faster than a loaded M5 Max CPU. The same day on that CPU (load 38 to 47): a three-shard block proved shard by shard and aggregated by recursion, 19 min (1,139 s) end to end, 245 to 337 s per compressed shard proof, every proof verified. What is not there: no proof is produced, carried or checked on the chain (the devnet prover is a stub that signs claims), the proving pool pays nobody (row 21), the block proven is far below one shard, and the 60-second figure remains a design target; the pass mark is the standard in docs/benchmarks/proving-e2e.md. Second RTX 5090 run, 4 October 2026 evening (job run-20261004-173115): a full shard at the provisional S_p (6.75 M pgas, 60.8 M cycles) executed in 1.63 s, core proof 8.3 s (18.1 MB), compressed proof 10.9 s (1.27 MB, verify 0.040 s); a two-shard block (13.5 M pgas) proved shard by shard (11.7 s and 10.0 s) and aggregated in 2.2 s, 24 s of GPU stages end to end, every proof verified, six tampered witnesses rejected. The two host defects (an abort after the upload, an idle wait that turned out to be an unbuffered 18 MB proof save through the WSL2 file bridge, 24 minutes) are fixed (ledger P20) 5 October 2026, live devnet with real transactions (bench-log "real transactions, the first non-empty shard proven and paid"): block 72704 shard 0, 29 transfers, 5,800 pgas, proven on the RTX 5090 Windows rig in 34 s, verified on the Apple M5 Max in 0.297 s and paid 1.7623 IGN, 53 s after the chain block executed; of about 1,400 blocks in the 20-minute window 36 were proven (the one prover takes the newest shard assigned to it), so "every block" is not yet true; a second content shard (72803, all copies skipped) failed the native-execution veto on the exporter's block structure, fixed with fixtures the same day, the node side pending the 0.3.9 rollout 5 October 2026, evening (bench-log "proving v1"): the aggregated segment record, the chain rule and the unproven rule are implemented behind proving_v1_activation_daa (branch proving-v1, not on the devnet before 0.3.11); on the RTX 5090 a chain of 8 consecutive live blocks proved and aggregated by recursion in 135.6 s with the miner on the card (17 s a block, one proof of 1,272,909 bytes attesting all 8, verified in 0.04 s); the 3-node fast-time harness paid a segment record 1.0 s after submission and refused a late one after its deadline (21 checks); the devnet itself, with one prover, carried proofs for 2.4% of blocks over 30 minutes at a block-to-record latency p50 44 s, p99 52 s. The "within about a minute" holds per proven block; "every block" needs 18 mining 5090s or 6 proving-only cards at empty blocks on the measured rates, and the mandatory rule stays off until the share is onenone yet 16A 12 GB card proves one shard in about 20 s (WITHDRAWN 5 October 2026: a 24 GB card proves a full shard at the adopted size in 4.3 s; 32 GB mines and proves)
Litepaper Proving ("The proving budget"); roadmap gate 2
designedspec 5.1 (Target), 7.6 (S_p provisional, 7,500,000 pgas = B_p / 4)PROVE-SHARD.bat on the RTX 5090 (pending); the end-to-end standard in docs/benchmarks/proving-e2e.md; bench-log "proving: devnet v4 shards"Measured on a 32 GB card, not yet on a 12 GB card. A shard at the provisional S_p is 60.8 M SP1 cycles on the prototype pgas table (9 cycles per pgas, 44 per EVM gas; the modexp entry about 100x its SP1 cost); on an RTX 5090 (4 October 2026 evening, job run-20261004-173115) it executed in 1.63 s and its compressed proof took 10.9 s, verified in 0.040 s, so the 32 GB card is inside the 20 s target with margin. Whether a 12 GB card proves it at all, and in what time, is the next measurement (an RTX 3060 and an RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB are on order). A per-shard time can be met by shrinking the shard, so the project does not use it as a pass mark 5 October 2026, evening (bench-log "proving v1", the S_p curve): measured on the RTX 5090 with SP1 6.8.1's GPU prover, the card to itself, 1-s nvidia-smi samples: an empty shard 13,874 MiB and 2.2 s; a full shard at the ADOPTED v1 budget (30,000 pgas, 4.7 M cycles) 20,434 MiB and 4.3 s; the full prototype shard (6.75 M pgas, 60 M cycles) 28,307 MiB and 10.8 s; beside the miner 15,670 and 30,039 MiB. No environment knob of SP1 moves the 13.9 GB floor and the GPU server has no options of its own, so on this build a 12 GB card proves nothing, a 16 GB card only empty shards, a 24 GB card the adopted full shard alone and beside the miner (22,210 MiB and 13.2 s, measured on the 32 GB card: the 5090's allocation pattern, not yet a run on a 24 GB card) and a 32 GB card the prototype shard beside the miner with 2.5 GB spare. The litepaper line now says so; the 12 GB gate returns when a prover build with a smaller floor is measured on a 12 GB cardnone yet -17The chip resistance claim: at launch the strongest chip in the public model reaches 2.1x (a core as good as a GPU lane, k = 1) to 3.4x (a core three times better, k about 0.33) per joule against an RTX 5090 under class v4, live from genesis on the testnet and the mainnet; the ladder's second rung brings it to about 2.8x; class v5 makes the dataset the chain's state so a stateless or stale chip is wrong on every item; the hot-set cache is bounded at 1.067x at the ceiling and the weak-day FPGA at 12 percent on 15 days a century, both routed to the next class; datacentre silicon does not change the question; a stored-dataset chip pays for itself only at about USD 100 M of market cap in two years; without class v4 the same chip would reach 5x to 9x (the class v3 baseline, the devnet's starting state, never the launch state)
the home page's chip line, the litepaper's chip section (/litepaper#chip-model), the miner page's line
tested by the team (every card, the verifier, the two attack-pass bounds, the H100), the chip itself modelled, class v5 and the ladder designed, the X9 figure claimed against a CPU core and never measureddocs/analysis/chip-model-v3.md 5 and 6; docs/analysis/latency-shadow-2026-10-06.md; docs/plans/counter-asic-3-status.md; docs/analysis/attack-pass/f8-uniform.md, f4-weakday.md, docs/analysis/ca3-v4-uniform.md; docs/design/class-v5-stored-state.md; the H100 and market-cap rows of 7 October; docs/plans/cryptanalysis/in-house-pass.md (the internal adversarial pass)the chip model's arithmetic in its file; the card rows by the benchmark package; the attack-pass harnesses tools/attack/f8-uniform and the F4 census; the verifier by igneum-pow bench136 MH/s at 350 W (5090, bench) and 290 W (app); the class v4 efficiency passes (bench log "7 to 8 October 2026, the class v4 efficiency passes: the core clock lock on the RTX 5090 and the RTX 5080", measured): the 5090 at 136.84 MH/s and 475.5 W unlocked, 134.98 at 316.3 W at a 1,400 MHz core lock, the best points class v4 at 1,200 MHz (133.80 MH/s, 305.1 W, 0.439 MH/W) and class v3 at 1,300 MHz (134.62, 223.3 W, 0.603), the premium 145 W unlocked and 82 W at the best points, the knee 1,300 MHz; the RTX 5080 (8 October 2026, the dock card of the three-card Windows rig) at 71.41 MH/s and 253.1 W unlocked under class v4 against 71.28 at 169.7 W under class v3, the best points class v4 at 1,100 MHz (71.20 MH/s, 146.6 W, 0.486 MH/W) and class v3 at 1,000 MHz (71.11, 103.7 W, 0.686), the premium 83.4 W unlocked and 41 W at the best points, the knee between 1,000 and 900 MHz; per tier: a 5080 owner on class v4 locked near 1,100 MHz pays 147 W instead of 253 for 0.3 percent less rate, MH per watt up 72 percent, the lever Ember Tune's core-clock knob in 0.3.24; 27 MH/s at 21 W (M5 Max); 249 MH/s (H100 SXM) at 98 percent of its read ceiling, 1.78x hash, 1.15x MH/W, a third per rented dollar; 2.33 ms per warp; 2.1x, 3.4x, 2.8x at launch; the shadow's premium on a 5090 81.8 W at its knee (class v4 at the 1,200 MHz lock 133.80 MH/s at 305.1 W; class v3 at 1,300 MHz 134.62 at 223.3 W; 7 October 2026); 1.067x at the ceiling; 12 percent on 15 days a century; 10.85 ms at rung 3; USD 100 M; 5.1x to 9.2x the class v3 baseline; 6 and 7 October 2026, the M5 Max, the RTX 5090 Windows rig's RTX 5090, the three-card Windows rig's RX 9070 XT and RTX 4070, a rented H100 SXM, igneum-build-1 The k about 0.33 bound is the implied core of Bitmain's Antminer X9 (RandomX; 1,000 KH/s, 2,472 W, 2.47 J per KH, USD 5,600; pre-orders 26 December 2025), withdrawn in mid-May 2026 with buyers refunded before any unit shipped, no independent benchmark, commodity Sophgo SG2044 server SoCs with an AES accelerator, no tapeout: a claimed, unmeasured figure carried as the pessimistic bound, not a calibration point (attack pass AP-F5-1, 7 October 2026).none yet; the next test is the internal adversarial pass (three lanes new to the hash code, outsider inputs only, reports published whole), and no outside review has run yet +17The chip resistance claim: at launch the strongest chip in the public model reaches 2.1x (a core as good as a GPU lane, k = 1) to 3.4x (a core three times better, k about 0.33) per joule against an RTX 5090 under class v4, live from genesis on the testnet and the mainnet; the ladder's second rung brings it to about 2.8x; class v5 makes the dataset the chain's state so a stateless or stale chip is wrong on every item; the hot-set cache is bounded at 1.067x at the ceiling and the weak-day FPGA at 12 percent on 15 days a century, both routed to the next class; datacentre silicon does not change the question; a stored-dataset chip pays for itself only at about USD 100 M of market cap in two years; without class v4 the same chip would reach 5x to 9x (the class v3 baseline, the devnet's starting state, never the launch state)
the home page's chip line, the litepaper's chip section (/litepaper#chip-model), the miner page's line
tested by the team (every card, the verifier, the two attack-pass bounds, the H100), the chip itself modelled, class v5 and the ladder designed, the X9 figure claimed against a CPU core and never measureddocs/analysis/chip-model-v3.md 5 and 6; docs/analysis/latency-shadow-2026-10-06.md; docs/plans/counter-asic-3-status.md; docs/analysis/attack-pass/f8-uniform.md, f4-weakday.md, docs/analysis/ca3-v4-uniform.md; docs/design/class-v5-stored-state.md; the H100 and market-cap rows of 7 October; docs/plans/cryptanalysis/in-house-pass.md (the internal adversarial pass)the chip model's arithmetic in its file; the card rows by the benchmark package; the attack-pass harnesses tools/attack/f8-uniform and the F4 census; the verifier by igneum-pow bench136 MH/s at 350 W (5090, bench) and 290 W (app); the class v4 efficiency passes (bench log "7 to 8 October 2026, the class v4 efficiency passes: the core clock lock on the RTX 5090 and the RTX 5080", measured): the 5090 at 136.84 MH/s and 475.5 W unlocked, 134.98 at 316.3 W at a 1,400 MHz core lock, the best points class v4 at 1,200 MHz (133.80 MH/s, 305.1 W, 0.439 MH/W) and class v3 at 1,300 MHz (134.62, 223.3 W, 0.603), the premium 145 W unlocked and 82 W at the best points, the knee 1,300 MHz; the RTX 5080 (8 October 2026, the dock card of the three-card Windows rig) at 71.41 MH/s and 253.1 W unlocked under class v4 against 71.28 at 169.7 W under class v3, the best points class v4 at 1,100 MHz (71.20 MH/s, 146.6 W, 0.486 MH/W) and class v3 at 1,000 MHz (71.11, 103.7 W, 0.686), the premium 83.4 W unlocked and 41 W at the best points, the knee between 1,000 and 900 MHz; per tier: a 5080 owner on class v4 locked near 1,100 MHz pays 147 W instead of 253 for 0.3 percent less rate, MH per watt up 72 percent, the lever Ember Tune's core-clock knob in 0.3.24; 27 MH/s at 21 W (M5 Max); 249 MH/s (H100 SXM) at 98 percent of its read ceiling, 1.78x hash, 1.15x MH/W, a third per rented dollar; 2.33 ms per warp; 2.1x, 3.4x, 2.8x at launch; the shadow's premium on a 5090 81.8 W at its knee (class v4 at the 1,200 MHz lock 133.80 MH/s at 305.1 W; class v3 at 1,300 MHz 134.62 at 223.3 W; 7 October 2026); 1.067x at the ceiling; 12 percent on 15 days a century; 10.85 ms at rung 3; USD 100 M; 5.1x to 9.2x the class v3 baseline; 6 and 7 October 2026, the M5 Max, the RTX 5090 Windows rig's RTX 5090, the three-card Windows rig's RX 9070 XT and RTX 4070, a rented H100 SXM, igneum-build-1 The k about 0.33 bound is the implied core of Bitmain's Antminer X9 (RandomX; 1,000 KH/s, 2,472 W, 2.47 J per KH, USD 5,600; pre-orders 26 December 2025), withdrawn in mid-May 2026 with buyers refunded before any unit shipped, no independent benchmark, commodity Sophgo SG2044 server SoCs with an AES accelerator, no tapeout: a claimed, unmeasured figure carried as the pessimistic bound, not a calibration point (attack pass AP-F5-1, 7 October 2026).none yet; the next test is the internal adversarial pass (three lanes new to the hash code, outsider inputs only, reports published whole), whose floor reading is in (measured, 8 October 2026; ledger AP-F8-1 and AP-F8-6): nine of nine hot sets refused; the diffuse era-stride excess, bounded under 0.1 percent of a hash's reads per site, is not caught by the floor and is the next class's test, and no outside review has run yet 18The chip resistance measurements: the program is latency-bound (random reads), not bandwidth-bound, on every card we own, and sits beyond a card's on-chip cache
Litepaper Mining ("waits on memory latency, not on maths or bandwidth"), vs RandomX; the numbers page
tested by the teamreadwidth e752fc7 (docs/plans/read-width.md), ca2-era 78c0ee4, ca2-cache 2de19e5 (docs/plans/hot-table.md)The dependent-read probes at 32 to 1,024 MiB and the hash rate per class on the three cards; the latency-bound share = rate over the probe ceiling per loadLatency-bound share at the 1 GiB dataset: RTX 5090 0.96 (v2) and 1.01 (v3), RX 9070 XT 0.87 and 0.95, M5 Max 1.01 and 1.06; wider reads do not close the AMD gap (the 9070 XT does 2.4 G dependent reads per second at every width; the 5090 goes bandwidth-bound at 64 B, share 0.58); a 32 to 96 MiB hot table is not kept resident by any card while the dataset streams (g 0.80 to 0.87 in the added form). 5 October 2026none yet 19The lottery hash is sound as a hash: uniform output, deterministic, no out-of-bounds read, fuzzed; class v3 bit-exact on the three vendors
Litepaper vs RandomX ("Every number above is measured and logged"), the numbers page
tested by the teamca2-mixer 1ab8b21 (tests/mixer.rs, tests/scratch.rs), ca2-era 78c0ee4, ca2-soundness a465881 (docs/analysis/scratch-soundness.md), igneum-pow/tests/packs.rsThe crate suite (53 + 4 + 19 + 7), the Metal fuzz, edge, stats and determinism runs on the v3 construction, the pack vectors and 2^24 fingerprints on Metal, Apple OpenCL, the RTX 5090 and the RX 9070 XT, the 1,024-hash CPU re-check per cardClass v3 (mixer x8 + era): 200-program fuzz 200 of 200 on Metal, every tenth on Apple OpenCL; the pinned v3 packs 3/3 + 3/3 and 96 of 96 lanes on Metal and Apple OpenCL; the six era packs' fingerprints equal on the three vendors (the three-card Windows rig (RTX 5090, RTX 4070, RX 9070 XT) job run-ca2-era-pc1-20261005, 5 October 2026); the v2 exports byte-identical on the v3 crate; the final-class PC rows and the G2 re-check: job run-ca2-era-pc1b-20261005 (pending at the time of writing)none yet 20No premine, no pre-sale, no allocation: every coin is minted by the schedule and every coin goes to the block producer (80%) and the proving pool (20%)
Homepage stats and Economics tiles; litepaper Supply, Economics
implementedrepo 6ac80a3; fork "igneum-node devnet v0"; consensus/core/src/igneum.rs, coinbase.rscargo test -p kaspa-consensus-core igneum (8 pass: subsidy table, ramp, split, cap) and cargo test -p kaspa-consensus coinbase (8 pass); igneum-miner inspect 40; bench-log "igneum-node devnet v0"Coinbases on the devnet: 80/20 exact on 39 of 39 single-payee blocks, the 20% to the igneum-proving-pool-v0 output; the per-second schedule sums to under the 4,000,000,000 cap by less than 100 coins; 3,168,808,781 units per DAA second in years 0 to 2, halving at 63,115,200 DAA s. 3 October 2026, Apple M5 Max. The devnet genesis carries no allocation; the mainnet genesis does not exist yet, so the claim is about the code and the stated rule, not a launch that has happenednone yet From e1401ffd663e61789302931d56e8406d4a193440 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: igneum-labs <337424239+igneum-labs@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 08:39:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Bench table: the Intel Arc B580 row stands, with the 8 October re-read in its note (the installed 0.3.21 worker passes its self-test on this card, 96 of 96 lanes, 54 re-checked blocks at 10.58 MH/s; the kit build that failed lacked the Intel rotate-fold rewrite, a build fault and not an Arc result); /miners rebuilt Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 --- site/miner-bench.json | 2 +- site/miners.html | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/site/miner-bench.json b/site/miner-bench.json index 44e6d0ea2..36fd3d21a 100644 --- a/site/miner-bench.json +++ b/site/miner-bench.json @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ "date": "2026-10-07", "source": "bench log: 7 October 2026, the Intel Arc B580 (eGPU equals slot)", "by": "measured by the team", - "note": "the same rate in the Thunderbolt enclosure and the slot; watts not read on this run", + "note": "the same rate in the Thunderbolt enclosure and the slot; watts not read on this run. Re-read 8 October 2026: the installed 0.3.21 OpenCL worker on this card passes its own self-test with the devnet pack (96 of 96 vector lanes) and mined 54 CPU-re-checked blocks at 10.58 MH/s, so the row stands; a kit build from a branch without the Intel rotate-fold rewrite failed its self-test on this card the same morning, a build fault and not an Arc result", "v4_cost": "0.1 percent of rate, measured 7 October 2026", "tuned": "stock, bench only", "driver_os": "Intel driver, Windows 11", diff --git a/site/miners.html b/site/miners.html index 32f87b478..a272c4976 100644 --- a/site/miners.html +++ b/site/miners.html @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ table{min-width:560px}

Best desktop card: NVIDIA RTX 5090, 136.1 MH/s, 0.563 MH per wall watt tuned (measured, 2026-10-06).

One row per card on the current class: the class v4 program (the latency-shadow block over the class v3 hash), or a class v3 row re-measured with its class v4 cost on 6 October 2026 or later. Cards you can buy first, sorted by hash rate; click a column header to sort. MH per wall watt uses board or wall power; a row whose watts are the chip's (Apple silicon: GPU plus DRAM from IOReport) says so and is not ranked on that column. Integrated GPUs are not listed. Datacentre cards and the earlier classes sit below, collapsed.

Why the rate fell from the first bench to today. The genesis program did 104 dependent random 4-byte loads per hash over a 1 GiB dataset; the hourly program and class v3 do 128, with the mixer between them; class v4 adds about 100,000 integer operations per hash that ride in the memory wait. So the hash is bound by random-read bandwidth by design, and a card's MH/s is a relative number: the difficulty follows it, and the same card earns the same share of blocks at 136 MH/s on class v3 as it did at 228 MH/s on the genesis program. What a miner compares is hash per watt, and what the chain cares about is the chip edge, which the shadow work is there to cut.

-
NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32 GB)		136.1 stock (127.7 tuned)226.8 tuned (350 stock)0.563133.8 MH/s, 305 W, 0.439Ember Tune1,854 / 13,801 / 460 W2026-10-06team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: class v4 at the 1,200 MHz knee: 133.80 MH/s at 305.1 W (0.439 MH/W); the premium over class v3 81.8 W at the best points and 145.3 W unlocked, measured 7 October 2026 · Tuned: full Ember Tune: 1,854 MHz core lock at the 100 percent cap · Hive flight sheet: core lock 1,854 MHz, mem 13,801 MHz, PL 460 W (measured 6 October 2026 (Ember run 6: the clock lock 1,854 MHz, the memory clock as read, the limit 460 W of 575 as the cap did not bind)) · Miner: Igneum Miner 0.3.13 + Ember Tune kit 6 (mining, class v3 program) (NVIDIA driver, Windows 11) · Source: bench log: 6 October 2026, Ember run 6; Counter ASIC 3.0 status: item 8's 5090 rows and the class v4 efficiency pass (7 October 2026) · Note: one row for the card: best rate 136.1 MH/s at 350 W stock unlocked on the class v3 control (bench, 6 October 2026); best MH per wall watt 127.71 MH/s at 226.8 W at the full Ember Tune point, 1,854 MHz (Ember run 6, 6 October 2026); the class v4 efficiency pass (7 October 2026, 60 s steps, every fingerprint matched): unlocked 136.84 MH/s at 475.5 W (0.288), the 1,400 MHz lock 134.98 at 316.3 W (0.427), the knee 1,300 MHz, the best point 1,200 MHz 133.80 at 305.1 W (0.439); the fleet's standing 5090 reads 100.6 MH/s at 308 W beside its prover (reported by the fleet)
NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti (16 GB)		78.4145.60.539not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 5080 (16 GB)		71.4 stock (71.2 tuned)146.6 tuned (253 stock)0.486+83 W unlocked, +41 W at the best pointscore lock 1,100 MHz1,100 / 0 / 0 W2026-10-08team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: 83.4 W unlocked and 41 W at the best points for 0.2 percent of rate (class v4 71.41 MH/s at 253.1 W against class v3 71.28 at 169.7 W unlocked; measured 8 October 2026) · Tuned: core lock 1,100 MHz (the efficiency pass's best point: 71.20 MH/s at 146.6 W, 0.486 MH/W, 106.5 W recovered for 0.29 percent of rate), memory 14,801 MHz, the driver's power limit untouched · Hive flight sheet: core lock 1,100 MHz, mem 0 MHz, PL 0 W (core lock 1,100 MHz, memory stock, power limit untouched (measured 8 October 2026, the efficiency pass)) · Miner: the runner's card switch, class v4 program (job run-ca3-pc1-v4-eff-5080-20261007-d) (NVIDIA driver 617.14, Windows 11) · Source: bench log: 7 to 8 October 2026, the class v4 efficiency passes: the core clock lock on the RTX 5090 and the RTX 5080 · Note: the knee sits between 1,000 and 900 MHz (the rate within 0.3 percent of unlocked down to 1,000 MHz, 5.2 percent off at 900 on class v4); the draw floors from 1,500 MHz down. The rented fleet's 5080 read 71.16 MH/s at 143.4 W stock (hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04, 7 October 2026), 110 W under this card's stock draw: the method differs per row (nvidia-smi on Linux, the runner's card switch on Windows) and neither is taken as the card's figure until the fleet re-measures
NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti (24 GB)		62249.50.248not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580.65.06, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 3080 Ti (12 GB)		59267.30.221not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580.65.06, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Note: 283.0 W maximum
NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24 GB)		52.3183.10.285not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, the RTX 4090 hands row · Note: the hands row: the card mines and proves (17.4 GB peak while proving); the standing 4090 voters read 44.5 to 50.8 MH/s this hour beside their provers
NVIDIA RTX 5070 (12 GB)		52102.80.506not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 3090 (24 GB)		50not readnot measurednot measuredstock, miningstock2026-10-07reported, fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, mining · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-miner, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: the fleet's standing voters (status lines, 7 October 2026) · Note: the best of four standing voters this hour (42.2 to 50.0 MH/s) beside their provers; watts not read
NVIDIA RTX 3080 (10 GB)		43.7not readnot measurednot measuredstock, miningstock2026-10-07reported, fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, mining · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-miner, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: the fleet's standing voter (status line, 7 October 2026) and the sweep's hands row · Note: a standing voter's status line, 18:00Z; the hands row of the sweep reads 40.82 MH/s at 204.9 W; 10 GB, no prover
NVIDIA RTX 3070 Ti (8 GB)		39178.30.219not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 595.71.05, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 3070 (8 GB)		33.7not readnot measurednot measuredstock, miningstock2026-10-07reported, fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, mining · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-miner, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: the fleet's 0.3.21 wipe canary (status line, 7 October 2026) · Note: the 0.3.21 wipe canary's status line, 17:07Z, beside its node; watts not read
NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti (8 GB)		33.1129.50.256not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 5060 (8 GB)		31.375.40.415not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti (12 GB)		31.3107.30.291not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 4070 (12 GB)		3179.50.389+30 WEmber Tune1,863 / 10,251 / 100 W2026-10-06team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: +30 W (79 to 109 W) for +0.4 percent of rate at 102,100 ops per hash, measured 6 October 2026 · Tuned: full Ember Tune: 1,860 MHz core lock, 160 W cap (Ember run 6: 1,863 MHz at the 50 percent cap, 75.6 W) · Hive flight sheet: core lock 1,863 MHz, mem 10,251 MHz, PL 100 W (measured 6 October 2026 (Ember run 6: 1,863 MHz at the 50 percent cap of 200 W, 75.6 W drawn; the item 8 rows at 1,860 MHz and 160 W)) · Miner: igneum-worker-cuda bench (installed worker), class v3 control (NVIDIA driver, Windows 11) · Source: Counter ASIC 3.0 status: item 8, the RTX 4070 rows (job run-ca3-pc1-4070-shadow-20261006) · Note: 79.3 to 79.8 W at the tune point; 28.78 MH/s at 75.6 W (0.381) in Ember run 6 mining
NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB)		30.9114.80.2690.1 percent ratestock, benchstock2026-10-07team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: 0.1 percent of rate, measured 7 October 2026 · Tuned: stock, bench only (180 W default cap, never tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: Igneum Miner 0.3.19 package, prebuilt NVRTC worker (bench mode, class v4 program) (NVIDIA driver, Windows 11) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, the first 16 GB card: an RTX 5060 Ti in a Thunderbolt enclosure (run b) · Note: class v4 program, 128 loads per hash, 1 GiB dataset, 10-minute window on the card alone at the stock 180 W limit: 114.8 W mean; PCIe 4.0 x4 through the enclosure
Apple M5 Max (40 GPU cores, Metal)		2721 (chip watts, not wall)○ 1.29 (chip watts, not ranked)+16 Wno leverstock2026-10-06team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: +16 W for 1.5 percent of rate at 102,100 ops per hash, measured 6 October 2026 · Tuned: no lever on Apple silicon (no clock or power control exposed); stock · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: igneum-miner Metal worker, class v3 program (macOS, Metal) · Source: Counter ASIC 3.0 status: item 8, the Apple M5 Max rows (IOReport GPU and DRAM watts) · Note: GPU plus DRAM watts from IOReport, not wall power, so its MH per watt is not ranked against the cards' wall figures
NVIDIA RTX 3060 (12 GB)		26.9111.60.241not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580.126.09, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Note: 114.5 W maximum; the Devnet 3 boxes read 23.7 to 25.7 MH/s beside their nodes
NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB)		20.177.50.259not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (16 GB)		18.9 (18.8 to 19.2 on the G1 ladder)202 stock0.093+2 percent rateno leverstock2026-10-08team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: +2 percent of rate (19.29 against 18.92 MH/s) at 102,100 ops per hash, watts owed, measured 6 October 2026 · Tuned: no lever: the app has no AMD knob today (an AMD core-clock knob through rocm-smi or ADL is the path, a morning item) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no lever on AMD in 0.3.20; no measured tune point) · Miner: igneum-worker-opencl bench (installed worker), class v3 control (Adrenalin 26.9.2, Windows 11) · Source: Counter ASIC 3.0 status: the 9070 XT Ember tune (run-ca3-pc1-ember-9070-20261007, 06:11Z, app 0.3.20) for the watts; item 8's RX 9070 XT rows (the G1 ladder, 6 October 2026) for the rate · Note: the watts are the app's own power reading at the stock point, no external sampler (8 October 2026, the status row): the Ember tune on this card measured the stock point and stopped, 0.3.20 having no AMD knob (power_pct 0, clock_cap 0, limit 0.0 W)
Intel Arc B580 (12 GB)		11not readnot measured0.1 percent ratestock, benchstock2026-10-07team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: 0.1 percent of rate, measured 7 October 2026 · Tuned: stock, bench only · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: igneum-worker-opencl bench, class v4 program (Intel driver, Windows 11) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, the Intel Arc B580 (eGPU equals slot) · Note: the same rate in the Thunderbolt enclosure and the slot; watts not read on this run
+
NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32 GB)		136.1 stock (127.7 tuned)226.8 tuned (350 stock)0.563133.8 MH/s, 305 W, 0.439Ember Tune1,854 / 13,801 / 460 W2026-10-06team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: class v4 at the 1,200 MHz knee: 133.80 MH/s at 305.1 W (0.439 MH/W); the premium over class v3 81.8 W at the best points and 145.3 W unlocked, measured 7 October 2026 · Tuned: full Ember Tune: 1,854 MHz core lock at the 100 percent cap · Hive flight sheet: core lock 1,854 MHz, mem 13,801 MHz, PL 460 W (measured 6 October 2026 (Ember run 6: the clock lock 1,854 MHz, the memory clock as read, the limit 460 W of 575 as the cap did not bind)) · Miner: Igneum Miner 0.3.13 + Ember Tune kit 6 (mining, class v3 program) (NVIDIA driver, Windows 11) · Source: bench log: 6 October 2026, Ember run 6; Counter ASIC 3.0 status: item 8's 5090 rows and the class v4 efficiency pass (7 October 2026) · Note: one row for the card: best rate 136.1 MH/s at 350 W stock unlocked on the class v3 control (bench, 6 October 2026); best MH per wall watt 127.71 MH/s at 226.8 W at the full Ember Tune point, 1,854 MHz (Ember run 6, 6 October 2026); the class v4 efficiency pass (7 October 2026, 60 s steps, every fingerprint matched): unlocked 136.84 MH/s at 475.5 W (0.288), the 1,400 MHz lock 134.98 at 316.3 W (0.427), the knee 1,300 MHz, the best point 1,200 MHz 133.80 at 305.1 W (0.439); the fleet's standing 5090 reads 100.6 MH/s at 308 W beside its prover (reported by the fleet)
NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti (16 GB)		78.4145.60.539not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 5080 (16 GB)		71.4 stock (71.2 tuned)146.6 tuned (253 stock)0.486+83 W unlocked, +41 W at the best pointscore lock 1,100 MHz1,100 / 0 / 0 W2026-10-08team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: 83.4 W unlocked and 41 W at the best points for 0.2 percent of rate (class v4 71.41 MH/s at 253.1 W against class v3 71.28 at 169.7 W unlocked; measured 8 October 2026) · Tuned: core lock 1,100 MHz (the efficiency pass's best point: 71.20 MH/s at 146.6 W, 0.486 MH/W, 106.5 W recovered for 0.29 percent of rate), memory 14,801 MHz, the driver's power limit untouched · Hive flight sheet: core lock 1,100 MHz, mem 0 MHz, PL 0 W (core lock 1,100 MHz, memory stock, power limit untouched (measured 8 October 2026, the efficiency pass)) · Miner: the runner's card switch, class v4 program (job run-ca3-pc1-v4-eff-5080-20261007-d) (NVIDIA driver 617.14, Windows 11) · Source: bench log: 7 to 8 October 2026, the class v4 efficiency passes: the core clock lock on the RTX 5090 and the RTX 5080 · Note: the knee sits between 1,000 and 900 MHz (the rate within 0.3 percent of unlocked down to 1,000 MHz, 5.2 percent off at 900 on class v4); the draw floors from 1,500 MHz down. The rented fleet's 5080 read 71.16 MH/s at 143.4 W stock (hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04, 7 October 2026), 110 W under this card's stock draw: the method differs per row (nvidia-smi on Linux, the runner's card switch on Windows) and neither is taken as the card's figure until the fleet re-measures
NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti (24 GB)		62249.50.248not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580.65.06, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 3080 Ti (12 GB)		59267.30.221not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580.65.06, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Note: 283.0 W maximum
NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24 GB)		52.3183.10.285not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, the RTX 4090 hands row · Note: the hands row: the card mines and proves (17.4 GB peak while proving); the standing 4090 voters read 44.5 to 50.8 MH/s this hour beside their provers
NVIDIA RTX 5070 (12 GB)		52102.80.506not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 3090 (24 GB)		50not readnot measurednot measuredstock, miningstock2026-10-07reported, fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, mining · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-miner, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: the fleet's standing voters (status lines, 7 October 2026) · Note: the best of four standing voters this hour (42.2 to 50.0 MH/s) beside their provers; watts not read
NVIDIA RTX 3080 (10 GB)		43.7not readnot measurednot measuredstock, miningstock2026-10-07reported, fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, mining · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-miner, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: the fleet's standing voter (status line, 7 October 2026) and the sweep's hands row · Note: a standing voter's status line, 18:00Z; the hands row of the sweep reads 40.82 MH/s at 204.9 W; 10 GB, no prover
NVIDIA RTX 3070 Ti (8 GB)		39178.30.219not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 595.71.05, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 3070 (8 GB)		33.7not readnot measurednot measuredstock, miningstock2026-10-07reported, fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, mining · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-miner, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: the fleet's 0.3.21 wipe canary (status line, 7 October 2026) · Note: the 0.3.21 wipe canary's status line, 17:07Z, beside its node; watts not read
NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti (8 GB)		33.1129.50.256not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 5060 (8 GB)		31.375.40.415not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti (12 GB)		31.3107.30.291not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
NVIDIA RTX 4070 (12 GB)		3179.50.389+30 WEmber Tune1,863 / 10,251 / 100 W2026-10-06team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: +30 W (79 to 109 W) for +0.4 percent of rate at 102,100 ops per hash, measured 6 October 2026 · Tuned: full Ember Tune: 1,860 MHz core lock, 160 W cap (Ember run 6: 1,863 MHz at the 50 percent cap, 75.6 W) · Hive flight sheet: core lock 1,863 MHz, mem 10,251 MHz, PL 100 W (measured 6 October 2026 (Ember run 6: 1,863 MHz at the 50 percent cap of 200 W, 75.6 W drawn; the item 8 rows at 1,860 MHz and 160 W)) · Miner: igneum-worker-cuda bench (installed worker), class v3 control (NVIDIA driver, Windows 11) · Source: Counter ASIC 3.0 status: item 8, the RTX 4070 rows (job run-ca3-pc1-4070-shadow-20261006) · Note: 79.3 to 79.8 W at the tune point; 28.78 MH/s at 75.6 W (0.381) in Ember run 6 mining
NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB)		30.9114.80.2690.1 percent ratestock, benchstock2026-10-07team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: 0.1 percent of rate, measured 7 October 2026 · Tuned: stock, bench only (180 W default cap, never tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: Igneum Miner 0.3.19 package, prebuilt NVRTC worker (bench mode, class v4 program) (NVIDIA driver, Windows 11) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, the first 16 GB card: an RTX 5060 Ti in a Thunderbolt enclosure (run b) · Note: class v4 program, 128 loads per hash, 1 GiB dataset, 10-minute window on the card alone at the stock 180 W limit: 114.8 W mean; PCIe 4.0 x4 through the enclosure
Apple M5 Max (40 GPU cores, Metal)		2721 (chip watts, not wall)○ 1.29 (chip watts, not ranked)+16 Wno leverstock2026-10-06team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: +16 W for 1.5 percent of rate at 102,100 ops per hash, measured 6 October 2026 · Tuned: no lever on Apple silicon (no clock or power control exposed); stock · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: igneum-miner Metal worker, class v3 program (macOS, Metal) · Source: Counter ASIC 3.0 status: item 8, the Apple M5 Max rows (IOReport GPU and DRAM watts) · Note: GPU plus DRAM watts from IOReport, not wall power, so its MH per watt is not ranked against the cards' wall figures
NVIDIA RTX 3060 (12 GB)		26.9111.60.241not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580.126.09, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Note: 114.5 W maximum; the Devnet 3 boxes read 23.7 to 25.7 MH/s beside their nodes
NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB)		20.177.50.259not measuredstock, benchstock2026-10-07fleet
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: not measured (class v4 program only) · Tuned: stock, bench only (rented, not tuned) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04)
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (16 GB)		18.9 (18.8 to 19.2 on the G1 ladder)202 stock0.093+2 percent rateno leverstock2026-10-08team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: +2 percent of rate (19.29 against 18.92 MH/s) at 102,100 ops per hash, watts owed, measured 6 October 2026 · Tuned: no lever: the app has no AMD knob today (an AMD core-clock knob through rocm-smi or ADL is the path, a morning item) · Hive flight sheet: stock (no lever on AMD in 0.3.20; no measured tune point) · Miner: igneum-worker-opencl bench (installed worker), class v3 control (Adrenalin 26.9.2, Windows 11) · Source: Counter ASIC 3.0 status: the 9070 XT Ember tune (run-ca3-pc1-ember-9070-20261007, 06:11Z, app 0.3.20) for the watts; item 8's RX 9070 XT rows (the G1 ladder, 6 October 2026) for the rate · Note: the watts are the app's own power reading at the stock point, no external sampler (8 October 2026, the status row): the Ember tune on this card measured the stock point and stopped, 0.3.20 having no AMD knob (power_pct 0, clock_cap 0, limit 0.0 W)
Intel Arc B580 (12 GB)		11not readnot measured0.1 percent ratestock, benchstock2026-10-07team
Generator: v2 · Class v4 cost: 0.1 percent of rate, measured 7 October 2026 · Tuned: stock, bench only · Hive flight sheet: stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read) · Miner: igneum-worker-opencl bench, class v4 program (Intel driver, Windows 11) · Source: bench log: 7 October 2026, the Intel Arc B580 (eGPU equals slot) · Note: the same rate in the Thunderbolt enclosure and the slot; watts not read on this run. Re-read 8 October 2026: the installed 0.3.21 OpenCL worker on this card passes its own self-test with the devnet pack (96 of 96 vector lanes) and mined 54 CPU-re-checked blocks at 10.58 MH/s, so the row stands; a kit build from a branch without the Intel rotate-fold rewrite failed its self-test on this card the same morning, a build fault and not an Arc result

Cards you can buy on the current class: 21. Each row names the engineering log entry or the job it came from.

Datacentre cards (8 rows, rented for the measurement; about three times the rented dollars per hash of a desktop card)

Rented cards measured on the class v4 program by the fleet, stock clocks. They mine; they are not what a home miner buys.