igneum-network/igneum
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Activity

multi-family adversary: the placed board figures corrected to the model's output

Browse source 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Documents-only replay of 2b30cfd0b (10b901a46934c24ce9b44c74bc6fd4db7c40d2b0) for the box mirror master
This commit is contained in:
igneum-labs 2026-10-08 16:00:26 +00:00
parent a0abb94cdc
commit 6b6c5e783e
1 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

7
docs/analysis/class-v6/multi-family-adversary.md
View file

@ -295,9 +295,10 @@ under the 8-lane core, the imem and the sequencer amortised over four times the
The board rows of section 6 restated at the placed energy (the full core at 6.06 pJ per lane-op at N5, band 5.45
to 7.43; 4.36 at N3): the complete GDDR7 machine 1.44 microjoules per hash, **1.6x the 5090 at its lock per joule
node-for-node (1.4x to 1.8x), 1.9x a node ahead (1.6x to 2.1x)**, 1.4x and 1.7x against the 5080 at its lock,
2.5x and 2.9x against the cohort card, USD 4.84 per MH/s (3.3x per dollar at MSRP) unchanged; the N2 SRAM die 2.8x
and 3.8x; the stored-half hybrid of section 13 2.4x and 2.9x. Placement moves every per-joule ratio down by about
node-for-node (1.4x to 1.8x), 1.9x a node ahead (1.5x to 2.1x)**, 1.4x and 1.7x against the 5080 at its lock,
2.5x and 2.9x against the cohort card, USD 4.84 per MH/s (3.3x per dollar at MSRP) unchanged; the N2 SRAM die 2.4x
and 3.3x; the stored-half hybrid of section 13 about 2.4x and 2.9x (the synthesised 2.69x and 3.33x less the
placement tenth). Placement moves every per-joule ratio down by about
a tenth and no per-dollar ratio, and the review's rule that synthesis is never a lower bound is read here the
other way too: the placed figure is the row, the synthesised one the floor it sat above by a third.