From 52261a2ffc852cdc35426470c796bfa6142e3505 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: igneum-labs <337424239+igneum-labs@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 00:14:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] adv-accept report: ledger 01:14 BST, build-1 leases gave up; row 90's second half and five shards moved to box 2 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 --- docs/analysis/cryptanalysis/report-acceptance-rule.md | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/analysis/cryptanalysis/report-acceptance-rule.md b/docs/analysis/cryptanalysis/report-acceptance-rule.md index 858e67e36..08507bb52 100644 --- a/docs/analysis/cryptanalysis/report-acceptance-rule.md +++ b/docs/analysis/cryptanalysis/report-acceptance-rule.md @@ -851,6 +851,13 @@ go through another path than the pool (the bounded suite slot, most likely) and free; at 01:07 the live chain on the three tail seeds that surfaced after the 23:50 count (228763, 638990, 623492) took 32 of them, with their 2^20 read queued beside it at 8 cores. +01:13 BST, build-1: none of my leases left; row 90's second half (queued 21:24) and the five build-1 +shards (queued 23:05) reached the lease's 2 h give-up behind the 12 attack-pass holders without ever +taking cores, so build-1 gave this lane nothing from 20:42 BST on. Box 2 had room (load 49, no class v5 +lease), so at 01:14 row 90's second half (attempts-10k-b, seeds 10002 to 20001) and the five shards (s09b +from 911979, s05b from 502127, s03 from 300002, s07b from 706081, s01d from 150610) were queued there at +32/16, behind sweep-s02e; the four box-2 shards yielded at 01:04 re-queue on their watcher. + ## Where the pass stands: the 00:00 BST reading (count refreshed 01:08 BST, 8 October; pool state at 23:50 BST) | Item | Reading |