Counter ASIC 3.0 gates (hash): ledger AP-F8-1, F8's 64-seed gate and exhaustion count on c79f6d96 (60 of 64, the four over = the named tail; 0 exhausted of 24,631), the node's draw-cost line
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3619437e89
commit
3be0bf6a88
1 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -2460,4 +2460,6 @@ Sub-version 3, second commit (7 October 2026, 14:44 UTC, the hash lane; the sub-
|
|||
|
||||
The second sub-version 3 commit is 017e70376489251e18564c0abce7e466e606c8b3 (pushed 15:10 UTC's preceding hour, pre-push gate GREEN, CI run 37639406567 success). The crate suite at 017e7037 on box 2 (rc 0, 184 s): 64 lib + 7 derive + 4 mixer + 19 packs + 2 recheck + 7 scratch = 103 passed, 0 failed, 3 diagnostics ignored; the lib tests took 140.8 s against ddacfbd3's 41 s for the whole suite, because every class v4 draw in the tests now pays the 2^20 pass on its chosen candidate (2.2 s each); that is CI time, not node time. The static census at 017e7037 (box 2, 15:1x UTC, 4,096 chain-shaped seeds plus F8's p1 to p3, the draws in parallel over the box's cores since the ratio pass makes the serial run a four-hour job): 4,099 programs, 0 lossy-sourced load sites of 65,584 (57,322 inject, 8,262 bijective), 0 exhaustions; the accepted attempt 1,297 at attempt 0, 899, 609, 416, 298, 197, 125, 92, 54, 46, 21, 14, 13, 9, 6, 0, 2, 1 (mean 2.086, max 17) against ddacfbd3's 1,328, 917, 622, 409, 284, ... (mean 1.998, max 17): the ratio refuses about 4 percent of the candidates that pass every other test, one more attempt on about one seed in twelve; the devnet epoch-0 seed at attempt 1, id a785001687d8688a; F8's p2 at attempt 5, p3 at attempt 1. The attack-pass lane's class check of ddacfbd3's shadow-executed verdicts against 8bdcbdd8 (598,678 chain-shaped seeds): 11,990 (2.0 percent) accept at a different attempt, 0 exhausted, max attempt 32; on 017e7037 the pairing holds (the devnet epoch-0 program draws as a785001687d8688a) and its 64-seed gate at 2^24 and 10^6 exhaustion count were running at 15:1x UTC (finish about 16:05 UTC).
|
||||
|
||||
F8's 64-seed gate on 017e7037 (the attack-pass lane, box 2, last seed 16:00:20 UTC): 60 of 64 under 1.2x; the four over are the named tail and nothing else (p10 1.5036x, p8 1.3776x, p34 1.2505x, p4 1.2167x; hottest items 355 to 541 reads of 2^31, unattributed, inside the ratio's clean spread); p23, p19, p15, p18 and p56 under the line; the clean spread 0.9915x to 1.144x. Exhaustion on 017e7037: 0 in the attack-pass lane's 20,532 chain-shaped seeds (max attempt 29) plus this lane's 4,099 (max 17); the 10^6 count continues as a strengthening line. Cost line for the node: the chain's epoch draw now pays the 2^20 ratio pass on every candidate that reaches it (the accepted one, and the about 4 percent that fail there), 2.2 s per pass on one box-2 core, so about 2.3 s per epoch draw on that core and, by the attack-pass lane's reading, about 4 to 5 s per epoch per node on slower cores; the earlier rejections cost milliseconds. From the attack-pass lane sub-version 3 at 017e7037 reads green on both gates with the named tail; its close line went to the plan, main and the Counter ASIC lane. This row stays open on the tail (p4, p8, p10, p34) until it is attributed or ruled accepted.
|
||||
|
||||
Owed (recorded, not run, by the project lead's word): G2 (the CPU verifier on 1,024 hashes per card) on the amended stream; G3 (the Metal fuzz, edge, stats and determinism runs) on the amended stream; the hash-rate ladder re-measure on the M5 Max and the RTX 5090 (the amendment changes the base program's source draws, not the op mix or the load count, so the latency-bound rows of `docs/analysis/latency-shadow-2026-10-06.md` are expected to hold within their spread; unmeasured); AMD (the RX 9070 XT, PC 1); the 2019-class verifier core (O-1.14); F8's phase E (the 64-seed dynamic census) on the amended stream, which is the attack-pass lane's and the test of the per-op table. The row reads FIXED-AND-PASSED only after phase E passes against the amended class.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue