Consequences ledger: C34 the packaged override line lacks proving v1's four fields

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/plans/consequences-2026-10-05.md

@@ -72,3 +72,4 @@ Merge note for the integrator (22:3x UTC): branch `consequences` is docs/plans/c
 | C33 | `/api/live` at 22:33Z: 13 of 482 blocks fully proven in 10 minutes (2.7%), 1 prover, median proof lag 46 s, the live node's verifier "Off" with 42 pool entries pending and 0 verified; `/api/stats` (the documented public API) carries no proving field at all | live and stats handlers (`site/api/stats.mjs` FIELDS; the explorer branch 3e01212); the homepage "~60 s to a proof"; evidence row 15 | everyone who reads the public API or the homepage tile; the testnet's first external reader | The public stats API hides the one number that qualifies the tile and row 15: coverage is 2.7% with one prover, and the proof lag is 46 s. A reader can find it only on /api/live. The live node's verifier "Off" (42 pending, 0 verified) is the Mac app node in trust mode or without a host, so the page says "verifier Off" while the chain pays provers: a public-page oddity the morning reader will ask about | `/api/stats` gains a `proving` object from the same live_state (`blocks_10m`, `blocks_fully_proven_10m`, `shards_paid_10m`, `provers_10m`, `median_proof_lag_s`, `active`), documented in docs/api/public-stats.md and in its contract test; the live page's verifier line names which node it reads and why it is off; the homepage tile's "~60 s" caption cites the measured 46 s median and the 2.7% coverage ("the target; today one prover covers 2.7% of blocks at a 46 s median") | explorer a76f60b415859b7b5 (the API); the tile caption: D2 wording for the project lead | closed on explorer d7e797c (/api/stats carries the proving object with coverage_10m, 0.0273 at 22:33Z, in the contract test, the live check and docs/api/public-stats.md with the sentence that coverage is what a third party reads before "every block is proven"; the live page's proving legend and the API note say the observer's node runs its own verifier off and reads paid shards from the chain). The homepage tile caption stays with the project lead (D2) |
 
 Sweep 11 (22:38 UTC) notes, no new row: gate G4b GREEN (a real Metal miner across a v3 boundary; a second Metal-only fault found and fixed first, 00c55aa: serveDataset keyed the day dataset by day alone and would have hashed v3 over an x1 dataset; the coordinator's next-cut rule: every worker path mines across a boundary in the gate network before a class change ships). The reviewer checked the PCs' side of that class: the CUDA worker and the OpenCL host build each resident pair (program, cache, dataset) from the pack's own memhard.h and key it by (epoch, day, class, era) through pairIsClass (proto-cuda/nvrtc/worker.cpp 451, proto-opencl/host.c 1106 on ca2-v3 fa3c932), so the fault does not reach the PCs at N4. The patched sp1-gpu-server built green on PC 2 at 22:32:29Z with sm_86, sm_89, sm_120 (C26's arch list), the floor sweep (9 points) running; the integration merges (readwidth 30ff674, origin/master 1f0d62c) on ca2-v3 49c7e78 with every check green. All gates but G5 (the ship's build) are green; the ship waits on the merged tip.
+| C34 | The rollout plan's packaged override line (counter-asic-2-rollout.md 26) carries five switches: difficulty_v2 33000, proving_v0 84100, fees_v1 210000, finality_v3 135200, program_class_v3 N4; section 8a says 0.3.11 publishes ONE object with both activations set | counter-asic-2-rollout.md 26 and 8a; proving-v1.md (the four v1 fields enter the digest only once proving_v1_activation_daa is set) | every node and every prover on the devnet at the 0.3.11 publish | If the publisher copies line 26, proving v1 ships in the binary and never activates: proving_v1_activation_daa stays at never on every node, the digest is the five-field one, the segment records are never carried, and C1's fix (the export fields) still works but the aggregator, the chain rule and the unproven rule stay off while the plan and the public copy say they are live. The four fields (activation_daa H1 = tip + 14,400 at publish, segment_blocks 8, unproven_daa 600, aggregator_share_bps 1000) must be in the packaged line, the manifest object, the hand nodes' and the seed's files, verbatim, and the expected digest read on a scratch node with all nine fields | Line 26 and the ship step name the nine-field object with N4 and H1 both set at publish and the scratch-node digest read over that object (the 22:xx "expected 0.3.11 digest with the two new fields at never" is the rolling-upgrade digest, not the activation one; both are recorded) | coordinator ada8afb62d752b1e2 (the ship runbook) | sent |