diff --git a/app/igneum-app/tiers/class-v5-tiers.json b/app/igneum-app/tiers/class-v5-tiers.json index 6b8e1dc72..611e3ec3b 100644 --- a/app/igneum-app/tiers/class-v5-tiers.json +++ b/app/igneum-app/tiers/class-v5-tiers.json @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ "source": "stock", "label": "measured", "uj": 3.54, - "note": "PC 1 (Windows) stock; a rented Linux host read 143.4 W at the same rate on class v3 against 169.7 W here: the two methods differ and neither is corrected" + "note": "PC 1 (Windows) stock; a rented Linux host read 143.4 W at the same rate on class v3 against 169.7 W here: the two methods differ and neither is corrected; the denominator sweep's Vast 5080 (13:16 UK) read class v4 70.95 MH/s at 239.8 W (3.38), v4 over v3 +41 percent on one host, so the rented and the PC stock rows agree on this card within 5 percent" } ], "src": "docs/bench-log.md, the RTX 5080 ladder, 8 October 2026 00:45 to 01:54 UTC (PC 1)" @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ "source": "stock", "label": "measured", "uj": 3.69, - "note": "Ember run 6 stock on class v3 (28.72 MH/s at 106.0 W); the bench-log 5 October row 28.7 at 102.7 W (3.58)" + "note": "Ember run 6 stock on class v3 (28.72 MH/s at 106.0 W); the bench-log 5 October row 28.7 at 102.7 W (3.58); the denominator sweep's Vast 4070 (13:21 UK) read class v3 30.83 MH/s at 107.1 W (3.47) stock, class v5 30.88 MATCH" } ], "src": "docs/plans/counter-asic-3-status.md item 8 (the 4070 rows, 6 October); docs/bench-log.md Ember run 6" @@ -828,9 +828,9 @@ "memory_gb": 10, "label": "estimated", "stock": { - "mhs": 42.0, - "w": 270.0, - "uj": 6.43, + "mhs": 49.83, + "w": 230.0, + "uj": 4.62, "class": "v4" }, "tiers": [ @@ -840,13 +840,13 @@ "power_pct": 80, "mem_mhz": 0, "limit_w": 320, - "mhs": 42.0, - "w": 240.0, - "mhw": 0.175, + "mhs": 49.5, + "w": 208.0, + "mhw": 0.238, "source": "measured", "label": "estimated", - "uj": 5.7, - "note": "the Ampere cap lever (10 to 15 percent); the 3080 Ti measured class v3 58.9 MH/s at 293.5 W (4.98) and, at a 220 W host cap with the SM at 749 MHz, class v4 42.6 at 216 W (5.08) with 28 percent of the rate lost: the Ampere cap's known-failed row" + "uj": 4.2, + "note": "the Ampere cap lever (10 percent) on the class v4 stock estimate; the 180 W host-limited class v3 row held the full rate, the 130 W cap did not" }, { "id": "balanced", @@ -854,12 +854,12 @@ "power_pct": 90, "mem_mhz": 0, "limit_w": 320, - "mhs": 42.0, - "w": 255.0, - "mhw": 0.1647, + "mhs": 49.83, + "w": 218.0, + "mhw": 0.2286, "source": "measured", "label": "estimated", - "uj": 6.07, + "uj": 4.37, "note": "one power rung under stock" }, { @@ -868,13 +868,13 @@ "power_pct": 100, "mem_mhz": 0, "limit_w": 320, - "mhs": 42.0, - "w": 270.0, - "mhw": 0.1556, + "mhs": 49.83, + "w": 230.0, + "mhw": 0.2167, "source": "stock", "label": "estimated", - "uj": 6.43, - "note": "the 0.3.12 rented row 40.82 MH/s at 204.9 W was an earlier class; the class v3 and v4 stock rows are owed to the denominator sweep" + "uj": 4.62, + "note": "the denominator sweep (13:28 UK): class v3 49.83 MH/s at 177.8 W (3.57) on a 180 W host limit, class v5 44.31 on the same host; the class v4 pod at a 130 W host cap read 24.0 MH/s at 129.2 W (5.38) with the SM at 501 MHz: the Ampere cap's known-failed shape; the class v4 stock watts by the 3080 Ti's +30 percent: about 230 W (4.62); stock partly measured, lock owed" } ], "src": "docs/analysis/prover-tiers-real-cards.md; ~/igneum-fleet/cardbench/rows.jsonl (the 3080 Ti rows); the sweep pending" @@ -951,8 +951,8 @@ "label": "estimated", "stock": { "mhs": 26.89, - "w": 145.0, - "uj": 5.39, + "w": 166.1, + "uj": 6.18, "class": "v4" }, "tiers": [ @@ -963,12 +963,12 @@ "mem_mhz": 0, "limit_w": 170, "mhs": 26.89, - "w": 132.0, - "mhw": 0.2037, + "w": 150.0, + "mhw": 0.1793, "source": "measured", "label": "estimated", - "uj": 4.9, - "note": "class v3 measured 26.89 MH/s at 111.6 W; the class v4 stock by the Ampere premium; the 3060 Ti at a 130 W host cap held 33.06 MH/s at 128.7 W under class v4 (3.89): a cap row measured on a sibling" + "uj": 5.58, + "note": "the Ampere cap lever (10 percent) on the measured class v4 stock row; the 3060 Ti at a 130 W host cap held 33.06 MH/s at 128.7 W under class v4 (3.89): a cap row measured on a sibling" }, { "id": "balanced", @@ -977,11 +977,11 @@ "mem_mhz": 0, "limit_w": 170, "mhs": 26.89, - "w": 138.0, - "mhw": 0.1949, + "w": 158.0, + "mhw": 0.1702, "source": "measured", "label": "estimated", - "uj": 5.13, + "uj": 5.88, "note": "one power rung under stock" }, { @@ -991,12 +991,12 @@ "mem_mhz": 0, "limit_w": 170, "mhs": 26.89, - "w": 145.0, - "mhw": 0.1854, + "w": 166.1, + "mhw": 0.1619, "source": "stock", - "label": "estimated", - "uj": 5.39, - "note": "the class v4 stock row is owed to the denominator sweep" + "label": "measured", + "uj": 6.18, + "note": "the denominator sweep's Vast 3060 (13:19 UK): class v4 26.89 MH/s at 166.1 W (6.18), v4 over v3 +44.6 percent on that host (the 7 October pod read class v3 26.89 at 111.6 W); stock measured, lock owed" } ], "src": "~/igneum-fleet/cardbench/rows.jsonl, 7 October (class v3); the sweep pending"